As AI and data centres surge, offshore wind Ireland becomes crucial for Ireland’s energy security and renewable energy future.
DUBLIN/NEW YORK, Sept 27 – Offshore wind Ireland is now at the heart of Ireland’s energy strategy, Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said. Speaking in New York this week, Martin warned that surging AI energy demand in Ireland and the explosive growth of data centres could trigger a full-blown Ireland energy crisis unless large-scale offshore wind projects are accelerated.
“We just have to get those offshore wind farms over the line, because that is the key for our self-reliance and independence in terms of energy,” Martin said.
“And also then it would enable us to have some future in terms of AI, because AI will use an enormous amount of energy, and we’re currently in difficulty on that front.”
Martin emphasized that offshore wind is not just a climate measure—it is essential for maintaining grid stability and supporting Ireland’s growing digital economy.
Table of Contents
Ireland’s Data Centres: A Surge in Energy Demand
Ireland has emerged as the data centre capital of the world, hosting 89 operational centres with over 40 more in the pipeline. Many are clustered near Dublin, forming energy-intensive hubs.
These facilities alone now consume around 22% of Ireland’s electricity, up from 21% in 2023 and just 5% in 2015—a staggering 531% increase over nine years.
“AI, cloud computing, and digital services will use an enormous amount of energy. That is the gap we must close with offshore wind,” the Taoiseach said.
The rapid growth of AI-driven workloads is adding further pressure, creating a potential Ireland energy crisis if offshore wind deployment lags.
Offshore Wind Ireland: Scaling Up for 2030 and Beyond
The Taoiseach said Ireland’s next decade will depend on delivering offshore wind Ireland at scale. Current capacity is modest—just 25 MW at the Arklow Bank Wind Park—but targets are ambitious:
5 GW by 2030
20 GW by 2040
37 GW by 2050
“In Ireland, the big issue for us will be offshore wind. We have already proven the impact of renewables in terms of our onshore wind performance over the last 20 years,” Martin said.
“It represents a very substantive part of our energy now. I think the offshore wind is the next big one for us.”
Ireland’s expansive Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)—seven times the size of its landmass—combined with powerful Atlantic winds, gives it a competitive edge in offshore renewable energy. Scaling these projects positions Ireland to supply both domestic demand and potentially export clean energy to Europe.
Policy and Investment Challenges
Despite these targets, development faces multiple hurdles:
Planning and environmental delays can stretch projects over a decade
Grid capacity is insufficient in some regions to handle large offshore flows
Financing requires strong government support to attract private investors
The government’s Offshore Wind Action Plan aims to streamline approvals, upgrade transmission connections, and encourage foreign investment. Industry leaders warn that without faster execution, Ireland risks falling behind European peers like Denmark, the UK, and Germany.
AI, Climate, and Health Implications
Martin’s warnings coincided with former US President Donald Trump’s UN address, in which he criticized Europe for backing green energy, claiming it would “go to hell.”
The Taoiseach countered firmly:
“We would disagree with the US administration on this. We believe in the science, and also we believe that there are economic opportunities as well,” he said.
“From a public health perspective, which rarely gets mentioned, there are huge gains. If you take fossil fuels out of the equation, ultimately we’re all living healthier lives.”
He stressed that Ireland’s renewable energy future is a pathway to both sustainability and economic growth, creating opportunities in energy-intensive industries and technology.
Ireland at the Crossroads: Technology Meets Sustainability
The intersection of AI growth, data centre expansion, and climate commitments places Ireland at a pivotal moment. Scaling offshore wind Ireland is the most viable solution to:
Meet AI energy demand in Ireland
Prevent an Ireland energy crisis
Achieve a net-zero and sustainable Ireland renewable energy future
Attract and maintain international investment in high-tech and industrial sectors
Failure to act could leave the country dependent on imports, vulnerable to price shocks, and unable to support the digital economy.
Conclusion: Offshore Wind Ireland Is the Nation’s Last Defense
The Taoiseach’s message is unequivocal: offshore wind Ireland is Ireland’s last line of defense against an energy crisis fueled by AI and data center growth. Delivering on these ambitious targets will secure Ireland’s renewable energy future, stabilize the grid, and allow Ireland to lead Europe in clean power generation.
“Offshore wind is not optional—it is essential to Ireland’s energy security and future prosperity,” Martin said.
Why is Trump shutting down Biden-approved offshore wind projects—and what does it mean for US clean energy goals?
After shutting down two other large offshore wind projects, New York’s Empire 1Wind Project and Lava Ridge, it is moving to shut down Rhode Island’s Revolution Wind. Trump’s offshore wind ban policy will destroy Ørsted’s multi-billion dollar offshore project. Approved during the Biden administration, the projects were celebrated as the backbone of America’s clean energy transition. Now, with Trump’s shutdown looming, critics are warning that the United States is backing away from its climate commitments at the very moment the world is moving toward a low-carbon future.
The Trump administration argues the opposite: these projects represent expensive, unreliable, and risky ventures that harm national security and American taxpayers. But we all know that renewable energy comes entirely from nature. All of Trump’s decisions are raising one of the most divisive energy debates in modern American history.
Ørsted’s $1.5 billion project: 80% Complete, Now in Limbo
On Friday, August 22, 2025, the Trump administration issued a surprise order: all work on Orsted’s $1.5 billion Revolution Wind project must cease.
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) wrote to Orsted that the moratorium was necessary to protect “the national security interests of the United States” and “prevent interference with the reasonable use of the exclusive economic zone, high seas, and territorial waters.”
“You may not resume operations until BOEM notifies you that BOEM has completed its required review,” the agency clearly told Orsted.
The order halted a project that was 80% complete, already employs hundreds of union workers, and was scheduled to be completed by 2026. If it works, Revolution Wind will provide 704 megawatts of clean electricity—enough to power more than 350,000 USA homes across Rhode Island and Connecticut.
Table of Contents
A Decade of Progress
Ørsted has been operating in the US for a long time and is considered a leader in offshore wind. It has completed and is operating each project with great efficiency and success.
Revolution Wind is no speculative venture. It has spent nearly a decade undergoing environmental, technical, and regulatory reviews and then received every federal and state permit, including approval of the construction and operating plan in November 2023.
In essence, it has signed 20-year power purchase agreements (PPAs) to deliver 400 megawatts of electricity to Rhode Island and 304 megawatts to Connecticut, which the states plan to rely on as part of a strategy to reduce emissions and stabilize electricity prices.
Ørsted stressed that the project is fully permitted and contractually binding—an issue that could become the focus of an upcoming legal battle.
Ørsted’s investment in the US
Since the suspension, Oersted’s statements have been both defiant and defensive. The company has emphasized its role in building US energy infrastructure:
Investing billions in offshore wind, ports and grid upgrades
Building shipbuilding and manufacturing supply chains in more than 40 states
More than 4 million union workers are working hours on US offshore wind projects.
2 million hours at Revolution Wind alone.
After Trump’s ban, it said, “Revolution Wind is employing local union workers who support both onshore and offshore construction operations.”
The company is also assessing its financial situation, including legal action. Investors were warned that the suspension could affect its rights issue, due in August 2025, which could potentially put further financial pressure on Ørsted’s US operations.
Empire 1 wind project and Lava Ridge: Casualties
Revolution Wind is not one. The Rhode Island project is the third major renewable project to be shut down by the Trump administration this year:
Empire 1 Wind Project (New York): First, in April, Interior officials revoked approval for the offshore project off Long Island, which was scheduled to power millions of New York homes.
Lava Ridge Wind Project (Idaho): Second, in August, the administration revoked Biden’s approval for this land-based wind farm that would have powered 500,000 homes.
Revolution Wind (Rhode Island): Third, now on hold despite being near completion.
These projects, together representing more than 1.5 gigawatts of renewable capacity, represent significant progress toward Biden’s clean energy goals—progress that is now almost certain.
Empire 1 Wind Project:
The Empire 1 Wind Project, an offshore anchor in New York off the coast of Long Island, was designed to be one of the largest offshore wind farms in New York. With the potential to generate more than 816 megawatts of clean electricity, it is said to be capable of providing clean power to millions of homes, and the project has been a major contributor to America’s ambitious climate goals.
In terms of economic opportunity, various industry reports say that Empire 1 wind project, if fully operational, would create thousands of construction jobs, long-term maintenance positions, and billions in local investment. In many ways, it is the cornerstone of New York’s renewables strategy, and its success or failure could build investor confidence in the entire US offshore sector.
Empire 1, in essence, could make New York the epicenter of renewable energy in America. But with other mega-projects like Revolution Wind under Trump’s leadership, the administration has expressed doubts that Empire 1 will survive political interference.
For clean energy advocates, this makes Empire 1 a test case: The question is can state-level ambitions outpace federal rollbacks?
Lava Ridge Wind Project
Trump’s executive order initially halted Lava Ridge Wind Project. The Lava Ridge Wind Project, a proposed 1,000 megawatt (MW) wind farm in Magic Valley, Idaho, was designed to provide clean electricity to California. Initially approved by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in 2024, the project was abruptly halted in January 2025 by an executive order from former President Donald Trump.
Trump’s executive order halted Lava Ridge Wind Project Image: US Department of Energy
The project was located on 104,000 acres northeast of Twin Falls and planned for more than 200 turbines, each up to 660 feet tall.
Trump declared the project “unconscionable to the public interest and subject to legal error” in his order, which effectively terminated Magic Valley Energy’s right to proceed. And on his first day in office, Trump fulfilled a campaign promise by halting the project. In a press release, he citied:
“I promised the people of Idaho that I would not rest until the Lava Ridge Wind Project was shut down. On the first day, I kept that promise.”
South Fork Wind
South Fork Wind: A small project with a large symbol Compared to Empire 1—about 132 megawatts—Orsted project — its significance is enormous. As one of the first offshore wind projects approved in U.S. federal waters, South Fork was built to prove that offshore turbines are technically feasible and can be accepted by the public. Located near the South Fork of Long Island, the project is already generating enough electricity to power 70,000 homes.
Image: South Fork Wind website
It also suggests that offshore wind is not just about large industrial projects; smaller, regionally concentrated wind farms can play an important role in diversifying America’s energy mix. South Fork also has symbolic significance: If the Trump administration continues to target larger projects for cancellation, small but viable farms like South Fork could become the backbone of early offshore deployment in the United States.
Opportunity amidst controversy Despite the political turmoil, both Empire 1 and South Fork demonstrate that offshore wind is one of the biggest opportunities for US clean energy goals.
Together, they represent: Job creation: Thousands of direct and indirect jobs in construction, manufacturing, shipping, and long-term operations. Energy security: Reducing reliance on fossil fuel imports through reliable, domestic power generation.
Climate progress: A solid step toward New York’s mandate to generate 70% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. Global investment appeal: An opportunity to keep the United States competitive with Europe and Asia, where offshore wind is already growing rapidly. Still, the controversy is hard to ignore. Biden approved several projects early in his term, but Trump’s recent shutdowns have eroded investor confidence and shaken local economies.
Image; South Fork Wind website
New York officials argue that canceling or delaying projects like Empire 1 could jeopardize billions of dollars in clean energy promises, while fossil fuel allies argue that offshore wind is still too expensive and disruptive. The big question is, ultimately, that Empire 1 and the South Fork are the realization of the crossroads that America now faces.
Will political agendas derail projects that promise jobs, clean air, and long-term savings—or will these wind farms stand as proof that the United States is serious about leading the renewable energy revolution?
For now, both projects are alive and well, but the future of America’s offshore wind sector could depend on whether Empire 1 and the South Fork can weather the political turmoil and deliver on their clean energy promises.
Trump’s offshore wind ban: Energy dominance
The US has taken a stand against the shutdown as part of a broader strategy to protect energy interests.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has dismissed large offshore wind farms as “massive, unreliable, non-stop energy projects” that are holding America back. He argues that they put a heavy burden on taxpayers and threaten the US “energy dominance” that Trump has been borrowing from his first term.
Beyond the rhetoric, the Trump administration launched a national security investigation into wind turbine imports, focusing on potential foreign subsidies and supply chain vulnerabilities. It has invited public comment, but unfortunately, critics say the process is opaque and politically motivated.
Then, in the next blow, Congress recently passed theOne Big Beautiful Bill, which further strengthens the strict regime by removing clean energy incentives from Biden’s inflation reduction law. For renewable developers, this is a sign of an increasingly hostile investment environment.
The government has repeatedly implemented various laws and policies that have cornered wind energy, especially offshore wind projects, causing companies to suffer huge losses and forcing them to shut down projects.
Biden’s view versus Trump’s opposite
The stark divide between the two administrations is clear:
Biden’s plan: to approve projects like Empire 1, Revolution Wind, and South Fork to deliver 30 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030, bringing clean electricity to more than half of homes. These projects were designed not only to provide clean electricity but also to help the United States reduce emissions, compete with countries such as China and Europe, and create massive jobs in clean energy.
Trump’s opposite: Trump has repeatedly called for canceling, delaying, or severely reviewing these projects, citing national security risks, cost burdens, and energy insecurity. All of the arguments Trump made have since been proven wrong.
Biden saw offshore wind as a path to climate leadership; Trump sees it as a liability.
AI generated
State pushback and legal action
The response from states has been swift. In May, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined 17 other AGs in suing the Trump administration over its offshore wind regulation efforts.
With Rhode Island and Connecticut directly affected by Revolution Wind, further legal challenges are likely. Given its contractual obligations under the PPA and the billions of dollars already spent, Ørsted could end up in court, as could others.
The court could now decide whether the federal government can unilaterally halt projects that have been fully approved and are already under construction.
US Clean Energy Goals at Risk
If these project closures become permanent, the impact would be huge:
First, 1.5 GW+ of offshore wind capacity would be completely lost
Nearly a million homes would be without clean power
Billions in investments by developers like Oersted would be frozen
Thousands of union jobs would be lost
State climate goals in New York, Rhode Island, and Connecticut would be thwarted
Finally, Biden’s 30 GW by 2030 goal would be weakened
image: AI genertaed
The U.S. would lose credibility in the global race for renewable energy leadership, not just in terms of targets. While Europe and China are aggressively expanding offshore wind; the U.S. would lag behind.
Orsted’s future in the US
The crisis raises questions about whether Oersted and other developers will continue to invest in the US market. Ørsted has already built the South Fork Wind project, which is supplying power to New York at a 53% power factor—compared to baseload sources.
For the company, South Fork proves that offshore wind can be both reliable and efficient. But with Revolution Wind stalled and Empire 1 canceled, Ørsted faces increasing uncertainty. If political risks become too high, developers could redirect capital to friendlier markets in Europe or Asia.
A Nation at a Crossroads
The changing political landscape has brought about a major shift in US energy policy. The United States is currently at a crossroads. On the one hand, the country could accelerate its deployment of renewable energy, reduce its reliance on fossil fuels, and secure a place as a global leader in clean energy.
On the other hand, it could expand its fossil fuel dominance, questioning its leadership position with foreign competitors. The fight against Oersted’s Revolution Wind will be emblematic of this struggle. Will America commit to a clean energy future, or will politics derail decades of progress?
In the Bottom
In the last words, the Trump administration’s shutdown of Ørsted’s Revolution Wind would be more than a bureaucratic delay—it would be a symbolic and practical blow to US clean energy goals. Biden’s approval of projects like Empire 1 and Revolution Wind promised to transform the U.S. energy landscape, but Trump’s shutdown is shattering that vision, throwing states, companies, and workers into turmoil.
As the lawsuits pile up and political divisions deepen, the future of U.S. offshore wind—and with it, America’s clean energy goals—hangs in the balance. For Ørsted, the fight is about rescuing a $1.5 billion investment. For America, it’s about deciding whether to lead the global race to renewable energy or fall behind. The question is which way America will go!
With US clean energy goals under threat! it remains to be seen whether the U.S. will lead the global renewable energy race—or fall behind? Stay tuned to https://windnewstoday.com/ for the latest on offshore wind, clean energy policy.
Europe aims to increase its offshore wind capacity to 84 GW by 2030, but one of the most important challenges is the lack of investment in shipbuilding and port infrastructure
Brussels, August 2025— Europe is facing a shortfall in offshore wind investment, according to a new report by IndEurope News. With just five years to go to meet its 2030 energy targets, Europe offshore wind investment needs an additional €2.4 billion in funding to ensure its offshore wind infrastructure can grow in time. Without this investment, Europe will fall behind in its clean energy transition.
Table of Contents
Europe needs urgent action to meet offshore wind targets
Europe currently has 36.6 gigawatts (GW) of installed offshore wind capacity. To meet climate targets and energy security commitments, this figure needs to rise to 84 GW by 2030. Achieving this target depends on the continent installing at least 10 GW of offshore wind capacity annually, which is expected to increase to 15 GW per year after 2030.
While the installation rate is currently on track, supporting infrastructure, including ports and ships, is not developing fast enough. It is understood that significant capacity shortfalls could hinder the deployment of offshore wind projects in the future.
Marine infrastructure plays a central role
The offshore wind supply chain is heavily dependent on Europe’s maritime infrastructure. In the last three years, €6.7 billion has been invested in port upgrades and ship procurement. Analysts warn an additional €6.4 billion is needed, and €2.4 billion in the short term to meet the 2030 target.
This infrastructure is needed for building, installing, and maintaining wind turbines, so without immediate investment in this area, the supply chain may not be able to handle the volume of installations needed to stay on track.
EU ports strategy aims to fill infrastructure gaps
The European Commission is developing a new EU-wide ports strategy aimed at supporting the offshore wind sector. Ports are crucial for the industry. They act as logistical hubs for transporting turbines and components, act as maintenance bases and provide the space needed to assemble large structures—especially for floating offshore wind.
Strategic importance of ports for offshore wind
Over the past three years, €4.4 billion has been invested in port infrastructure across Europe, yet the report finds that an additional €2.4 billion is urgently needed to upgrade facilities and expand port capacity, as ports play a key role in supporting local wind energy supply chains and delivering efficient projects across the continent.
Policy measures proposed in the EU Ports Strategy
The Ports Strategy is expected to recommend three key actions. Firstly, the European Investment Bank could be involved in increasing funding allocations through programs such as the EU Connecting Europe Facility and supporting strategic projects. Secondly, the Commission is likely to simplify permitting procedures, as it can currently take up to 10 years to approve port expansions. Finally, the strategy could include an EU-wide map of port capacity and plans to match them with the demand for offshore wind deployment in member states.
Shipbuilding and ship investment are barriers.
In the case of offshore wind, there was talk of ports but in addition to ports, Europe needs to make significant investments in its offshore wind fleet. Why ports? Because currently, around 80 ships are used across Europe to install turbines and transport workers. The emergence of larger turbines over 15 MW requires a new generation of ships with more advanced capabilities.
Technological innovation of ships is needed
In the last three years, Europe has already invested around €2.3 billion in offshore wind ships. Despite this progress, an additional €4 billion is needed to install larger and more technologically advanced turbines, many of which are not capable of handling the weight and complexity of the new models.
Reducing emissions from marine activities
Marine activities currently contribute up to 20% of the total life cycle emissions of an offshore wind project. Decarbonizing this sector is crucial. The EU Maritime Industrial Strategy is expected to promote clean fuels such as hydrogen, ammonia, and electricity while supporting the refitting of older ships or the construction of new zero-emission ships.
How Europe’s Offshore Wind Future Hinges on Strategic Europe Offshore Wind Investment
Europe’s offshore wind future largely depends on timely investment. Its ability to meet its offshore wind targets depends on swift and coordinated action. A well-funded port strategy and a forward-looking maritime industry strategy can ensure that infrastructure, permitting, and innovation are developed in line with demand.
Without investment, the European Union could fail to achieve its 2030 offshore wind goals. It clearly said that it risks losing its global leadership in renewable energy. Though the window for action narrows, decisions taken in the coming months will fix the future of Europe’s clean energy landscape.
Key points:
More than €4.4 billion has been invested in ports.
Ports supply, store, assemble, and maintain wind equipment.
Floating offshore wind infrastructure to be integrated into port areas
Europe to generate 10 GW of electricity per year by 2030 and 15 GW later
A €2.4 billion shortfall needs to be urgently filled.
Ports and ships are out of the question for offshore wind to succeed.
The strategic move will determine Europe’s energy security and competitiveness for decades to come.
In the Bottom
If the EU is serious about leading the way in offshore wind, it needs to match ambition with investment. The proposed EU Port Strategy and Maritime Industry Strategy offer a golden opportunity to close the Europe offshore wind investment of €2.4 billion and strengthen Europe’s journey towards a cleaner, more resilient energy system.
From WindNewsToday Staff | Source: Public Statements, New York post
Offshore wind transmission New York City halted amid Trump legacy — while nation’s largest offshore wind Farm is gaining momentum!
A tipping Point In The Wind
offshore wind is a stunning blow to the clean energy economy, the New York State Public Service Commission (PSC) is stopping the process for approving vital offshore wind transmission New York lines that is intended to deliver renewable electricity to the downstate region of New York City. The commission’s action, industry advocates say, is the single most severe blow so far to New York clean energy policy and climate goals — and they are placing the blame squarely on former President Donald Trump offshore wind opposition.
The PSC attributed the decision to federal uncertainty and Trump administration hostility toward offshore wind as the reasons for putting construction approvals on ice. The ruling, delivered with little fanfare but resonating mightily throughout the state’s energy sector, punctures New York’s signature climate law — the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act — which requires a power sector free of carbon by 2040 and a mix that includes 70 percent renewable energy by 2030.
“Offshore wind transmission New York Halted is significant,” said John B. Howard, a former PSC chairman. “The Climate Act is not operational. “We’re obviously going to be way past the emission deadlines.
Table of Contents
The Trump Shadow Still Looms
New York clean energy policy once made the state a national leader in clean energy innovation. But the P.S.C.’s stepping on the brakes of transmission lines essential for offshore wind integration shows a structural weakness one that would have become clear if it became impossible to get the wind-generated electricity to where it is most needed, New York City and left those targets a pipe dream.
Offshore wind projects in the United States, which have long been stymied along the East Coast, are facing a critical, make-or-break moment as a flurry of developers push to bring the turbines to American waters. The United States was rushing toward its 2030 clean energy goals, even New York clean energy goals — delivering clean electricity to trillion NYC homes and creating thousands of renewable energy jobs — but several new federal policy reversals under the former president, Donald Trump, are progressing the opposite.
Just yesterday, California’s clean energy companies were warning of this. They urged Gov. Gavin Newsom and state lawmakers to act quickly in response to drastic changes to federal tax policy under Trump. Industry leaders said the revisions endanger billions of dollars in investments in renewable energy and could upend California’s ambitious clean energy goals.
And all of this anxiety comes hot on the heels of another huge blow — the U.S. Department of the Interior last Friday said it would stop fast-tracking approval for solar and wind projects on federal land. And now, the effects have landed in New York.
In a surprise move today, the New York State Public Service Commission, PSC halts wind transmission lines that would carry offshore wind power to New York City and downstate. Without this crucial infrastructure in place, the most ambitious offshore wind projects will be unable to deliver electricity to homes and businesses—and their promise will remain unrealized.
“For now, offshore wind remains a promise deferred in New York.”
New York offshore Wind Projects already in the queue or under contract will likely move forward, but without the necessary transmission assets, it’s unlikely that much more development or full scale expansion will take place. State officials say the decision to pause is calculated and temporary, a safeguard to protect ratepayers at a time of political and economic volatility. But with the flawed and shifting landscape of federal support, the long-term roadmap now seems even more nebulous.
About offshore wind transmission New York — South Fork Wind — a great example of New York offshore Wind Projects, just completed in spring 2024 with creating nearly 1000 green jobs in 5 states — would connect offshore wind farms in the Atlantic Ocean to substations in the New York City metropolitan area, are now in legal limbo. Without these projects, there would be no practical way to transport the energy even if offshore wind farms were built.
Energy sources say the decision has the state’s green energy law “in shambles,” and throws into question the future of offshore wind as a significant power source for downstate New York.
Ratepayer Risk Amid Federal Paralysis
Beneath the PSC’s order looms the fear that New Yorkers, stuck with higher utility rates to pay for infrastructure that may never be used, could be left holding the bag. Customers of gas and electric utilities would have covered the costs of the transmission lines — a long-term investment that was financially viable only if the offshore wind projects went forward.
But it’s the refusal of the Trump administration to grant new offshore wind leases and permits in its term that has paralyzed certain pivotal developments. The Biden administration has since resumed permitting, but the PSC remains leery, warning that future federal elections might return more opponents to power, threatening long-term projects.
“There is no time to wait. The lowest-cost energy future for New York will feature a significant complement of offshore wind,” Alliance for Clean Energy New York and New York Offshore Wind Alliance (NYOWA) said in a joint statement. “We need our state to invest in transmission infrastructure and bolster a grid that will be able to accommodate the increasing demand for energy and at the same time save ratepayers money over the long term.”
The two groups maintain that if nothing is done New York risks being left lagging in the national race toward clean energy supremacy.
Politics and Permits: Trump’s Lasting Influence
Ørsted aims to create an ecosystem in which offshore wind and fishing can both thrive image: South Fork Wind Farm
The Trump administration’s wariness of offshore wind left a mark. Crucial permit freezes, regulatory barriers, and public resistance made for hostile local conditions for developers and financiers. And in the friendlier federal climate ushered in by President Biden, the scars remain, especially as at the state level, where projects take years to build and often require the support of many consecutive political administrations to finish.
New York Offshore wind projects can take more than a decade to develop — and that span frequently overlaps with tumultuous political cycles. Even small uncertainties can cause investment to freeze and execution to be postponed.
The PSC’s hesitation reflects that reality, and is not entirely unexpected given the political winds.
Hochul’s Balancing Act
Gov. Kathy Hochul, a longtime proponent of New York’s transition to renewable energy, had the PSC’s careful approach to the issue. And while saying she remained committed to clean energy and looking to shield ratepayers from financial risks associated with an uncertain federal support, an American Recovery Plan advocated the need for pocketbook protections.
“Governor Hochul has fiercely supported and remains committed to renewable energy projects, including offshore wind, but there is no doubt that, in this era of federal uncertainty, New York ratepayers need to be protected,” said Ken Lovett, her senior advisor for energy and the environment.
“In light of the political hostility to New York offshore wind projects from the federal government, and the consequent economic uncertainties surrounding such projects, we believe the PSC is correct that it would be unfair to burden ratepayers with the costs of a project that is not likely to produce any real benefits,” Lovett said. “When conditions are more favorable, we will be ready to proceed quickly.”
Offshore Wind Transmission New York Halted, Advocates React
The decision — PSC halts wind transmission lines, has been criticized by the clean energy industry as short-sighted. Advocates say that halting the development of new long-distance transportation now simply worsens the longer-term climate crisis, and that it lets fossil fuel infrastructure reign in the meantime.
“We appreciate concerns about cost — but inaction is even costlier: the cost of an increasingly damaged climate,” said Anne Reynolds, Executive Director of the Alliance for Clean Energy New York. “Delaying transmission is delaying progress.”
Trump offshore wind opposition decision by New York could cast a chill on the rest of the offshore wind industry in the Northeast at a time when states such as New Jersey, Massachusetts and Rhode Island are moving forward with their own transmission and wind deployment plans.
What’s Next?
For the moment, offshore wind lies as a promise deferred in New York. New York offshore Wind Projects that are already under contract can go forward, but there is little chance of further expansion to reach full scale without the “wires” to move the power. State officials emphasize that the pause is temporary and the result of strategy — the road ahead is hazier without more significant federal support, however.
The latest comes amid mounting frustration in the renewable energy industry. Now, offshore wind — long an iconic symbol of forward-looking climate ambition — is ensnared in a battle between state ambition and federal skepticism. Now, projects that require at least a decade of work to develop and build face a crucial question: Can they survive politics that are in a constant state of flux?
As climate deadlines loom and the demand for clean energy grows, the question is no longer whether the United States can lead the world in renewable energy — it’s whether it can regain lost momentum in time.
Can New York Catch the wind once again before it blows past?
Source — New York Post — https://nypost.com/2025/07/17/us-news/new-york-halts-offshore-wind-power-lines-citing-trump-opposition/
📌 For the latest on U.S. renewable energy policy, visit:
One wind turbine can generate enough electricity to power nearly 1,000 homes. But because of the so-called “Big Beautiful Bill,” hundreds of those turbines might not rise — and America’s clean-energy momentum may fizzle.
Advertised as a patriotic remake of America’s energy policy, the proposal includes the passage of a Senate amendment that would slap punitive tariffs on the backbone the wind power industry in the US. While a proposed tax on wind and solar was dropped from the, the final bill still des the phase-out of clean energy tax credits, essentially swifter projects only have two years — until 2027 — to be up and running, or lose critical financial assistance.
That may seem like a small tweak. It isn’t. Wind projects, particularly large farms, take years of planning, permitting and investment. If the bill reduces the timeline, it is throwing sand in the gears of an industry that is creating jobs, cutting emissions and giving new life to rural communities across the country.
These aren’t theoretical losses. Up to 72 percent of planned clean energy installations are at risk of being delayed or canceled, analysts say. That means lost work for turbine technicians and manufacturers. Lost Income for Farmers Leasing Land. And higher energy costs for families that could have benefited from cheap, homegrown power.
Wind power is not a dreamer’s dream. It’s a tried and true engine of economic and environmental progress. Just ask Texas, the country’s wind leader, where conservative farmers and green advocates alike now re
Table of Contents
America Stands at a Crossroads on Energy
For years, the United States has sought to be a world leader in wind power, putting millions of homes within easy reach of high plains and coastal breezes that can carry the electricity generated by wind turbines. But a bill now being readied in Congress — named in the tradition of energy nationalism, or more specifically, the “Big Beautiful Bill” — is poised to bring that progress to a grinding halt, or worse.
Hailed by former President Donald Trump as a major victory for “traditional American energy,” the Big Beautiful Bill is coming under fire from renewable energy experts, economists, labor unions, and business leaders for doing too much harm to the wind and solar industries. Critics say that the bill would overturn decades of bipartisan policy to promote clean energy and leave thousands of renewable projects hanging in the wind.
With far-reaching implications for clean energy tax credits, wind turbine manufacturing, energy prices and climate policy, it is on track to become one of the most significant — and contentious — energy fights of recent American history.
What Is the “Big Beautiful Bill”?
That bill, the “Big Beautiful Bill,” is a sweeping energy and tax reform package backed by Donald Trump, the former president, and some conservative lawmakers. Billed as a pro-American, pro–energy independence proposal, the bill is larded with clauses that:
Advance the sunset on clean energy tax credits, including the popular Production Tax Credit (PTC) for wind.
Limit wind and solar development that relies on imported components, particularly those from China.
Ramp up fossil fuel development, promising to lease out more federal territory for oil and gas drilling on public lands.
Diminish financial aid for new renewable energy initiatives that begin after 2027.
For good, the bill does not contain a proposed tax on wind and solar projects that was part of the negotiations a few weeks ago, although it still cuts by a relatively significant amount the time frame for the development of wind and solar power, which critics point out is no small thing.
How Wind Energy Works —Why Policy Matters
Wind power has become one of the cheapest and most readily scaleable forms of energy generation in the US. Today, one wind turbine can produce enough power for close to 1,000 homes year-round, and entire regions — looking at you, Texas and Iowa — now get a large fraction of their electricity from wind.
But wind projects — particularly utility-scale wind farms — are multi-year affairs that require planning and permitting, financing and construction. That’s what makes politically stable, long-term support so essential. And it’s true that programs like the Production Tax Credit (PTC), whose origins date back to the 1990s, have played a role in helping to make wind energy cost-competitive with fossil fuels.
The PTC generally extends a per-kilowatt-hour tax credit to developers over a period of 10 years for electricity produced from new wind facilities. Without these credits, many projects are dead on arrival — particularly through early-stage investment.
What Big Beautiful Bill Impact On Wind
Under the Big Beautiful Bill, only wind and solar projects that were fully operational by the end of 2027 would continue to be eligible for these federal clean energy tax credits. This small window is a serious challenge to the clean energy pipeline, as most wind projects have a 3–5 year timeline from conception to completion.
What’s at Stake?
From several clean energy analytics firms:
As much as 28 gigawatts (GW) of wind and solar projects in the works may no longer qualify for tax credits.
At least 72% of them are at risk of being delayed or dropped because of financing difficulties and political unpredictability.
Over 1.7 million jobsin construction, operations and manufacturing could be lost.
Hundred billions of dollars of investment in clean energy industries could leave for countries with more predictable energy policy.
In practice, that could translate to fewer turbines in the ground, less clean energy on the grid and higher electricity bills for American consumers.
Wind Energy Jobs: A growing Sector Under Threat
Wind power has been among the fastest growing renewable energy job sectors in the United States. Wind turbine technicians have been in the top five fastest growing jobs for years now, and the industry has brought:
Construction teams and engineers working on wind farms.
Technicians maintaining the turbines.
Turbine blade, tower and nacelle factory workers.
Truck drivers and cranemen hauling equipment.
Landowners, especially those in rural America, who rent land for wind projects.
All of those economic dividends are endangered by Big Beautiful Bill. And the thousands of renewable energy jobs that might disappear if project development in states such as Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Iowa stalls. All this clean power brought suddenly home to a place many Americans have never seen.
Elon Musk, and Industry Leaders Slam the Legislation
Among the most outspoken opponents of the Big Beautiful Bill is Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who characterized it as “utterly insane and destructive legislation.”
“It’s just madness,” Musk took to X (formerly known as Twitter) to write. “This bill is an exercise in handouts to the industries of the past that punishes the industries of the future. It would obliterate the American worker.”
Musk’s denunciation echoes growing recrimination in the tech and clean energy sectors that the bill is more about short-term political gain than about the U.S. leading in energy over the long term.
In a statement released to the media, the American Clean Power Association (ACPA) decried the legislation as “a step backward for American energy policy” and said it would drive up electricity costs, kill jobs for Americans and set current climate goals in the country back.
States Most Affected
Republican lawmakers on both the left and the right have thrown their weight behind the bill, but its impacts may fall hardest on Republican-led states. Consider the following:
Texas is the wind energy capital of the country, with thousands of wind jobs.
Iowa and Oklahoma produce more than 40 percent of their electricity from wind.
With strong wind resources, Wyoming, Kansas and North Dakota are adding projects to their portfolio of wind projects.
South Dakota and Nebraska are growing wind powerhouses that are dependent on federal help.
In these rural states, wind power was not simply a partisan issue; it was one of revenue, job creation and pride. And the Big Beautiful Bill, for all its patriotic trappings, could undermine these local triumphs.
Energy Security and Climate Consequences
The bill comes at a time when global energy security is particularly salient, given the conflicts and supply shocks that have underlined the need for diversified, domestic energy sources.
Wind power provides:
Energy independence — It does not depend on unpredictable fossil-fuel markets.
Cheap power — The price of wind energy has declined more than 70% during the past decade.
Zero emissions —Wind is one of the most environmentally friendly sources of power on the planet.
The proposed “Big Beautiful Bill” comes at a time of extreme global energy policy peril — when energy security has never been more important, and the dangers of ceding ourselves to dependency on fossil fuels have never been more stark. Ongoing geopolitical tensions, disruptions to supply chains, and fluctuating prices of oil and gas have all made it clear that investing in a diversified set of domestically based energy resources, especially those that are invulnerable to foreign shock, is critically important. In that way, wind is one of America’s smartest energy sources and provides a trifecta: energy independence, low cost and no emissions. While fossil fuels are tied to wild global marketplace fluctuations and ripe for inflation, wind power is grown here in America, impervious to the foreign fix we face with oil. Wind energy costs have fallen more than 70% over the last 10 years, now making wind one of the cleanest and also cheapest electricity options on the market.
Across the Great Plains and along the coasts, wind turbines have become as familiar a part of the American landscape as fast food outlets and big box stores, silently turning in the breeze, and now they are powering millions of American homes, and stabilizing local energy grids, saving working families money along the way. Perhaps more important, wind is a driving force behind America’s climate action—emitting no greenhouse gases, no air pollution, and no hazardous waste.
Photo: nyt
Taking about Big Beautiful Bill impact on wind industry 2025, having policies that support wind power is more important than ever as the world continues to race toward carbon-free energy, and as world leaders from over 150 countries commit to climate goals and to protect future generations. But the Big Beautiful Bill risks reversing this progress, if it undoes hard-won clean energy tax credits and introduces policy uncertainty at exactly the wrong moment. Cutting support for wind projects not only delays the deployment of clean energy but also delivers a catastrophic signal to investors, developers and international partners — that the United States is not longer serious about being a global leader in clean energy. Just as Europe and China scale up investments in renewables and build secure energy supply, any retreat by the U.S. would be a step back from the front lines of climate and energy innovation.
This uncertainty is a huge financial risk for investors and less motivation to invest in long-term infrastructure. For domestic producers, it could portend canceled orders, closed plants and lost chances to take the lead in a fast-evolving sector. And for the world, it calls into question whether America can be trusted to honor its environmental commitments. With the climate crisis getting worse by the day — with record-breaking wildfires, hurricanes and droughts becoming annual events — the urgency to support proven technologies like wind energy has never been higher. Rather than retrenching, the U.S. should double down on renewables investments that enhance national security, create good-paying jobs and lower emissions.
Wind turbine-driven energy independence is not some fantastical vision of the future; it’s a real-time reality built through decades of bipartisan putting our money where our mouths are and private sector elbow grease. Sabotaging such progress with short-sighted legislation could have devastating implications, not only for the environment, but for America’s competitiveness in the global energy economy of the future. By pursuing the policies that enhance the stability and growth of renewables – like extending the Production clean energy Tax Credits, supporting grid modernization and providing investors confidence – the United States can help prevent wind being a key part of national resilience. Instead, enacting a bill that leads us backward and undermines the very foundation of our clean energy structure will only continue the cycle of dependence upon fossil fuels, raise consumer costs, and cede the United States away from its leadership position in this century’s global race to dominate climate and energy policy.
The decision facing lawmakers isn’t just one of subsidies versus tax schedules — it’s about whether the United States will be at the front of or at the back of the 21st-century clean energy race.
Farmers, Landowners and Local Economies Suffer
Not only will big developers lose — local communities will be the losers as well.
Farmers who rent land to wind developers receive steady, long-term income.
Rural counties earn tax revenue from wind projects.
Wind energy taxes provide direct funding to local schools, fire departments, and hospitals.
And if the Big Beautiful Bill stalls new wind energy industry in the US, these lifelines to rural America would dry up — while, ironically, hurting the same communities the bill purports to aid.
Clean Energy vs. Fossil Fuel: A False Dilemma?
The Big Beautiful Bill Fossil Fuelvs. Clean Energy incentives, supporters of the bill, they argue, need to return to their livestock, energy realism and “support American oil and gas.” But some critics say that is a false choice.
“We don’t have to choose between jobs at home and clean energy,” said a spokesman for the ACPA. “We can have both — and we must if we are to compete in the world.”
The U.S. can and should help all energy workers — but not by hollowing out the sectors creating jobs and energizing investment.
Policy Recommendations — What Needs to Change
Now that the Big Beautiful Bill is now making its way over to the House of Representatives, clean energy advocates are lobbying for key amendments, including that the:
The Pass the PTC Act would extend the production tax credit (PTC) for wind through at least 2032.
Save loan guarantees and investment tax credits for renewable energy developers.
Opposing export penalties targeted at the renewable component supply chain.
Preventing trade provisions that penalize American energy consumers.
Such policy changes would revive confidence among investors, stabilize the development pipeline and allow the wind industry to continue to play a part in the economy.
A Crossroads for the Future of U.S. Wind Power
The Big Beautiful Bill (as it’s called) may sound patriotic on paper — but it’s about the furthest thing from that the American wind industry can imagine.
With over 1.7 million jobs at stake, billions of dollars of investment in jeopardy, and long-term climate and energy security objectives at risk, this bill is a critical moment in the life of our country.
America faces a choice to lead the global clean energy transition, or lag in a world increasingly fueled by wind, sun and innovation.
As members of the House debate, one thing is certain: decisions they make in the coming weeks are likely to influence the U.S. energy landscape for decades to come.
The “Big Beautiful Bill” is a landmark for the wind energy industry in the US– one that has driven economic development, revitalized rural America, and provided clean energy to millions of Americans. Although couched in terms of a patriotic energy plan, the bill imposes a faster phase-out of the Big Beautiful Bill wind eenrgy tax credits expiration and restrictive policies that will block or delay the completion of hundreds of wind projects, including the loss of over 1.7 million American jobs in clean wind energy.
In the midst of a global momentum for clean power, America needs to carefully consider the long-term implications of this law. Keeping the wind at our backs is not only an environmental imperative — it is an economic imperative, and a major component of America’s energy security.
As the legislation travels through Congress, lawmakers will decide through a series of forks in the road whether the U.S. remains at the forefront of renewable energy innovation or lags behind in the clean energy race across the world. The fate of millions of workers, communities and the climate demands it.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is the Big Beautiful Bill Impact On wind energy?
The Big Beautiful Bill is a proposed legislative package supported by former President Donald Trump that hastens the sunset of clean energy tax credits, which also extend to wind power. Only wind projects that are in service by the end of 2027 would be eligible for the Production Tax Credit (PTC), essentially setting back or even killing dozens of projects and threatening U.S. strides in renewable energy.
When would the wind energy tax credit expire under the Big Beautiful Bill?
Under the bill, wind energy tax credits would end in 2027. Any project that wasn’t up and running by Dec. 31, 2027, would lose eligibility for the federal Production Tax Credit, making it more difficult to secure financing and finish large wind farms on schedule.
How much clean-energy capacity is at risk from the new legislation?
As many as 28 gigawatts of planned wind or solar capacity could be put at risk, according to energy analysts, under the Big Beautiful Bill. Those projects may lose the critical tax credits and federal loan backing that helped launch them, halting the growth of clean energy in the United States.
What will the bill mean for renewable energy jobs?
The American Clean Power Association and labor unions project that if the wind tax credits lapse, over 1.7 million construction and manufacturing jobs could be lost. These losses would hit rural communities particularly hard, and states that have sunk billions of dollars in wind infrastructure, such as Texas, Iowa and Oklahoma.
What does the bill do for U.S. energy independence and climate goals?
The bill would damage U.S. energy independence by slashing incentives for domestic, clean sources of energy such as wind. It also puts the brakes on progress toward zero-emissions energy goals, sending a signal to global investors and allies that the United States might be pulling back at a time when other nations are accelerating investments in clean energy.
Can Congress overrule or alter the Big Beautiful Bill’s features?
Yes. The measure still needs to pass the House as well, and there’s a chance lawmakers could revive long-term tax credits for clean energy, extend eligibility timelines or add new givebacks to shore up renewable energy. Industry advocates are calling on Congress to act before long-lasting damage is inflicted on the wind energy business.
Why are permanent tax credits so critical for a wind project?
The process of planning, permitting, and constructing a wind energy project typically requires 3 to 5 years. Long-term, predictable tax credits such as the PTC provide developers and investors with the certainty to finance these multidecade projects. Abrupt changes in policy upset the entire development pipeline and sometimes lead to delays or cancellations.
China renewable energy news is great, with wind power boom in January-May enough to power entire countries like Indonesia or Turkey
BEIJING — June 2025
A charming example is set by china renewable energy record, China added 46 gigawatts (GW) of wind power and 198 gigawatts of solar power between January and May 2025, breaking China’s previous records and cementing its leadership in the global clean energy race. The Guardian says, the added capacity of wind and solar power during the five-month period in 2025 is enough to produce as much electricity as Indonesia or Turkey, according to Lori Mylivirta analysis, a senior fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute.
In May alone, China solar power growth 93 gigawatts of installation, the equivalent China solar panels installed per second about 100, and wind power capacity added 26 gigawatts, the size of about 5,300 turbines. These installations could power countries like Poland, Sweden, and the United Arab Emirates, depending on operating conditions and efficiency.
“We thought China’s rush to install solar and wind power was going to be absurd, but wow,” Mylivirta commented on social media.
Table of Contents
China renewable energy record amid global climate tensions
The latest development comes amid ongoing informal climate talks between Chinese officials and former US negotiators in Beijing. Diplomatic relations over climate action have been strained since former President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris climate accord, accusing China of rampant pollution while protecting domestic industry.
Despite being the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter, China is also by far the largest producer, installer and exporter of clean energy technology. China suppresses 1000 GW solar capacity, half of the total global production, according to government data and third-party trackers.
China green energy leadership was happen by Xi Jinping climate strategy. Chinese President Xi Jinping renewable energy speech has increasingly tied the country’s climate goals to national industrial policy, framing clean energy expansion as essential to rejuvenating the economy.
China’s role in the global climate talks now is not just about how much wind power China adds in 2025, but also about how it is winning the global clean energy race. “In the past five years, China has built the world’s largest and most complete new energy industrial chain,” Xi said at a conference in April.
The term “new energy” refers not only to wind and solar power, but also to battery storage, EV infrastructure and grid-scale technology.
This development has been accompanied by an explosive growth in supply chains and exports. But it has also put the financial squeeze on the whole of China’s solar industry. According to Bloomberg, the five largest Chinese solar companies reported a combined loss of more than8 billion yuan in Q1 of 2025.
Speaking at a recent industry conference, Yang Liyou, general manager of Jinneng Technology, said the existing pricing and production model was a“ death cycle,” suggesting hyper-competitionand wafer-thin margins could endanger the stability of China’s place as the world’s clean energy manufacturing kingpin.
World Impact and Climate Implications
China’s breathtaking build-out of wind and solar installations isn’t just actively reshaping its own energy landscape — it’s sending ripples out across global energy markets, upending international geopolitical strategies and, with it, the future of the clean energy transition.
Economically, sprawling production in China has pushed global prices for solar panels and wind components to historic lows. China solar and wind growth is good for developing countries with demand for affordable, clean energy, but it is also putting pressure on Western manufacturers, some of whom are pushing for trade barriers and subsidies to shield their domestic clean energy industries.
Politically, these numbers give China the ability to leverage climate diplomacy, particularly at a time when the United States and the E.U. are pressing for steeper emissions cuts even as they struggle with their own internal policy divisions. Now that China’s momentum in clean energy has become tightly linked to its economic strategy, the country will have an upper hand in future climate talks — especially since some Western powers are rethinking their dependence on Chinese-made technologies.
China clean energy expansion surge also speaks to a bigger pattern: The global center of gravity for energy innovation is shifting east. If the trajectory holds, China will be not only the largest emitter or the largest builder of clean energy, but it will also become the yardstick by which we measure whether, in the next generation of energy infrastructure, we will have a livable planet or not.
As China continues to pull ahead with the deployment of clean power, the geopolitics and economics of energy transition are changing. The sheer magnitude of the country’s manufacturing and installation has driven down worldwide prices but has also spawned concerns about sustainability, labor practices and market fairness.
Meanwhile, nations like the U.S. and those in the EU are re-evaluating trade and subsidy strategies to safeguard domestic clean energy industries, while attempting to achieve net zero goals.
As new solar and wind capacity is added at record-breaking rates — and political rhetoric is tightly intertwined with industrial strategy — China is, for once, not just competing in the race, Ms. Hsu said. It’s setting the pace.
China solar and wind power growth: Jan–May 2025
🌬️ 46 GW of wind power added
☀️ 198 gigawatts of solar power added
⚡ May only: 93 GW solar, 26 GW wind
🏆 Total installed solar: 1,000+ GW
📈 Enough new capacity to power: Poland, Sweden, Indonesia, Turkey
So that, China renewable energy record in 2025 represent a turning point for how the world uses energy. And with 46 GW of wind and 198 GW of solar deployed in only the first five months of the year, the country isn’t just outpacing its own climate targets, or lucrative wind and solar installation in china but redefining the global clean energy market.
Challenges endure — from economic hardship facing domestic producers to mounting geopolitical suspicion — but China’s sheer scale, speed and strategic linking of clean energy with economic policy have made it an unparallelled force in the field. As the world once again contemplates the urgent need for climate action and for secure energy, China’s market moves are making clear that the race to dominate the renewable energy is no longer some nod to a green future — it’s on.