WindNewsToday

Will Trump’s offshore wind ban destroy Ørsted’s $1.5 billion project?

Will Trump's offshore wind ban destroy Ørsted's $1.5 billion project?

Why is Trump shutting down Biden-approved offshore wind projects—and what does it mean for US clean energy goals?

After shutting down two other large offshore wind projects, New York’s Empire 1 Wind Project and Lava Ridge, it is moving to shut down Rhode Island’s Revolution Wind. Trump’s offshore wind ban policy will destroy Ørsted’s multi-billion dollar offshore project. Approved during the Biden administration, the projects were celebrated as the backbone of America’s clean energy transition. Now, with Trump’s shutdown looming, critics are warning that the United States is backing away from its climate commitments at the very moment the world is moving toward a low-carbon future.

The Trump administration argues the opposite: these projects represent expensive, unreliable, and risky ventures that harm national security and American taxpayers. But we all know that renewable energy comes entirely from nature. All of Trump’s decisions are raising one of the most divisive energy debates in modern American history.

Ørsted’s $1.5 billion project: 80% Complete, Now in Limbo

On Friday, August 22, 2025, the Trump administration issued a surprise order: all work on Orsted’s $1.5 billion Revolution Wind project must cease.

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) wrote to Orsted that the moratorium was necessary to protect “the national security interests of the United States” and “prevent interference with the reasonable use of the exclusive economic zone, high seas, and territorial waters.”

“You may not resume operations until BOEM notifies you that BOEM has completed its required review,” the agency clearly told Orsted.

The order halted a project that was 80% complete, already employs hundreds of union workers, and was scheduled to be completed by 2026. If it works, Revolution Wind will provide 704 megawatts of clean electricity—enough to power more than 350,000 USA homes across Rhode Island and Connecticut.

A Decade of Progress

Ørsted has been operating in the US for a long time and is considered a leader in offshore wind. It has completed and is operating each project with great efficiency and success.

Revolution Wind is no speculative venture. It has spent nearly a decade undergoing environmental, technical, and regulatory reviews and then received every federal and state permit, including approval of the construction and operating plan in November 2023.

In essence, it has signed 20-year power purchase agreements (PPAs) to deliver 400 megawatts of electricity to Rhode Island and 304 megawatts to Connecticut, which the states plan to rely on as part of a strategy to reduce emissions and stabilize electricity prices.

Ørsted stressed that the project is fully permitted and contractually binding—an issue that could become the focus of an upcoming legal battle.

Ørsted’s investment in the US

Since the suspension, Oersted’s statements have been both defiant and defensive. The company has emphasized its role in building US energy infrastructure:

Investing billions in offshore wind, ports and grid upgrades

  • Building shipbuilding and manufacturing supply chains in more than 40 states
  • More than 4 million union workers are working hours on US offshore wind projects.
  • 2 million hours at Revolution Wind alone.

After Trump’s ban, it said, “Revolution Wind is employing local union workers who support both onshore and offshore construction operations.”

The company is also assessing its financial situation, including legal action. Investors were warned that the suspension could affect its rights issue, due in August 2025, which could potentially put further financial pressure on Ørsted’s US operations.

Empire 1 wind project and Lava Ridge: Casualties

Revolution Wind is not one. The Rhode Island project is the third major renewable project to be shut down by the Trump administration this year:

  • Empire 1 Wind Project (New York): First, in April, Interior officials revoked approval for the offshore project off Long Island, which was scheduled to power millions of New York homes.
  • Lava Ridge Wind Project (Idaho): Second, in August, the administration revoked Biden’s approval for this land-based wind farm that would have powered 500,000 homes.
  • Revolution Wind (Rhode Island): Third, now on hold despite being near completion.
download Picsart AiImageEnhancer
Ørsted’s $1.5 billion project, Revolution Wind construction, Image: Revolution Wind Website

These projects, together representing more than 1.5 gigawatts of renewable capacity, represent significant progress toward Biden’s clean energy goals—progress that is now almost certain.

Empire 1 Wind Project:

The Empire 1 Wind Project, an offshore anchor in New York off the coast of Long Island, was designed to be one of the largest offshore wind farms in New York. With the potential to generate more than 816 megawatts of clean electricity, it is said to be capable of providing clean power to millions of homes, and the project has been a major contributor to America’s ambitious climate goals.

In terms of economic opportunity, various industry reports say that Empire 1 wind project, if fully operational, would create thousands of construction jobs, long-term maintenance positions, and billions in local investment. In many ways, it is the cornerstone of New York’s renewables strategy, and its success or failure could build investor confidence in the entire US offshore sector.

Empire 1, in essence, could make New York the epicenter of renewable energy in America. But with other mega-projects like Revolution Wind under Trump’s leadership, the administration has expressed doubts that Empire 1 will survive political interference.

For clean energy advocates, this makes Empire 1 a test case: The question is can state-level ambitions outpace federal rollbacks?

Lava Ridge Wind Project

Trump’s executive order initially halted Lava Ridge Wind Project. The Lava Ridge Wind Project, a proposed 1,000 megawatt (MW) wind farm in Magic Valley, Idaho, was designed to provide clean electricity to California. Initially approved by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in 2024, the project was abruptly halted in January 2025 by an executive order from former President Donald Trump.

Courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy lava
Trump’s executive order halted Lava Ridge Wind Project Image: US Department of Energy

The project was located on 104,000 acres northeast of Twin Falls and planned for more than 200 turbines, each up to 660 feet tall.

Trump declared the project “unconscionable to the public interest and subject to legal error” in his order, which effectively terminated Magic Valley Energy’s right to proceed. And on his first day in office, Trump fulfilled a campaign promise by halting the project. In a press release, he citied:

“I promised the people of Idaho that I would not rest until the Lava Ridge Wind Project was shut down. On the first day, I kept that promise.”

South Fork Wind

South Fork Wind: A small project with a large symbol Compared to Empire 1—about 132 megawatts—Orsted project — its significance is enormous. As one of the first offshore wind projects approved in U.S. federal waters, South Fork was built to prove that offshore turbines are technically feasible and can be accepted by the public. Located near the South Fork of Long Island, the project is already generating enough electricity to power 70,000 homes.

GfKtUJAXUAAf TUsouth fork Picsart AiImageEnhancer
Image: South Fork Wind website

It also suggests that offshore wind is not just about large industrial projects; smaller, regionally concentrated wind farms can play an important role in diversifying America’s energy mix. South Fork also has symbolic significance: If the Trump administration continues to target larger projects for cancellation, small but viable farms like South Fork could become the backbone of early offshore deployment in the United States.

Opportunity amidst controversy Despite the political turmoil, both Empire 1 and South Fork demonstrate that offshore wind is one of the biggest opportunities for US clean energy goals.

Together, they represent: Job creation: Thousands of direct and indirect jobs in construction, manufacturing, shipping, and long-term operations. Energy security: Reducing reliance on fossil fuel imports through reliable, domestic power generation.

Climate progress: A solid step toward New York’s mandate to generate 70% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. Global investment appeal: An opportunity to keep the United States competitive with Europe and Asia, where offshore wind is already growing rapidly. Still, the controversy is hard to ignore. Biden approved several projects early in his term, but Trump’s recent shutdowns have eroded investor confidence and shaken local economies.

south fork Picsart AiImageEnhancer
Image; South Fork Wind website

New York officials argue that canceling or delaying projects like Empire 1 could jeopardize billions of dollars in clean energy promises, while fossil fuel allies argue that offshore wind is still too expensive and disruptive. The big question is, ultimately, that Empire 1 and the South Fork are the realization of the crossroads that America now faces.

Will political agendas derail projects that promise jobs, clean air, and long-term savings—or will these wind farms stand as proof that the United States is serious about leading the renewable energy revolution?

For now, both projects are alive and well, but the future of America’s offshore wind sector could depend on whether Empire 1 and the South Fork can weather the political turmoil and deliver on their clean energy promises.

Trump’s offshore wind ban: Energy dominance

The US has taken a stand against the shutdown as part of a broader strategy to protect energy interests.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has dismissed large offshore wind farms as “massive, unreliable, non-stop energy projects” that are holding America back. He argues that they put a heavy burden on taxpayers and threaten the US “energy dominance” that Trump has been borrowing from his first term.

Beyond the rhetoric, the Trump administration launched a national security investigation into wind turbine imports, focusing on potential foreign subsidies and supply chain vulnerabilities. It has invited public comment, but unfortunately, critics say the process is opaque and politically motivated.

Then, in the next blow, Congress recently passed the One Big Beautiful Bill, which further strengthens the strict regime by removing clean energy incentives from Biden’s inflation reduction law. For renewable developers, this is a sign of an increasingly hostile investment environment.

The government has repeatedly implemented various laws and policies that have cornered wind energy, especially offshore wind projects, causing companies to suffer huge losses and forcing them to shut down projects.

Biden’s view versus Trump’s opposite

The stark divide between the two administrations is clear:

Biden’s plan: to approve projects like Empire 1, Revolution Wind, and South Fork to deliver 30 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030, bringing clean electricity to more than half of homes. These projects were designed not only to provide clean electricity but also to help the United States reduce emissions, compete with countries such as China and Europe, and create massive jobs in clean energy.

Trump’s opposite: Trump has repeatedly called for canceling, delaying, or severely reviewing these projects, citing national security risks, cost burdens, and energy insecurity. All of the arguments Trump made have since been proven wrong.

Biden saw offshore wind as a path to climate leadership; Trump sees it as a liability.

why is trump shutting down biden approved offshore
AI generated

The response from states has been swift. In May, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined 17 other AGs in suing the Trump administration over its offshore wind regulation efforts.

With Rhode Island and Connecticut directly affected by Revolution Wind, further legal challenges are likely. Given its contractual obligations under the PPA and the billions of dollars already spent, Ørsted could end up in court, as could others.

The court could now decide whether the federal government can unilaterally halt projects that have been fully approved and are already under construction.

US Clean Energy Goals at Risk

If these project closures become permanent, the impact would be huge:

  • First, 1.5 GW+ of offshore wind capacity would be completely lost
  • Nearly a million homes would be without clean power
  • Billions in investments by developers like Oersted would be frozen
  • Thousands of union jobs would be lost
  • State climate goals in New York, Rhode Island, and Connecticut would be thwarted
  • Finally, Biden’s 30 GW by 2030 goal would be weakened
the u s would lose credibility in the global ra
image: AI genertaed

The U.S. would lose credibility in the global race for renewable energy leadership, not just in terms of targets. While Europe and China are aggressively expanding offshore wind; the U.S. would lag behind.

Orsted’s future in the US

The crisis raises questions about whether Oersted and other developers will continue to invest in the US market. Ørsted has already built the South Fork Wind project, which is supplying power to New York at a 53% power factor—compared to baseload sources.

For the company, South Fork proves that offshore wind can be both reliable and efficient. But with Revolution Wind stalled and Empire 1 canceled, Ørsted faces increasing uncertainty. If political risks become too high, developers could redirect capital to friendlier markets in Europe or Asia.

A Nation at a Crossroads

The changing political landscape has brought about a major shift in US energy policy. The United States is currently at a crossroads. On the one hand, the country could accelerate its deployment of renewable energy, reduce its reliance on fossil fuels, and secure a place as a global leader in clean energy.

On the other hand, it could expand its fossil fuel dominance, questioning its leadership position with foreign competitors. The fight against Oersted’s Revolution Wind will be emblematic of this struggle. Will America commit to a clean energy future, or will politics derail decades of progress?

In the Bottom

In the last words, the Trump administration’s shutdown of Ørsted’s Revolution Wind would be more than a bureaucratic delay—it would be a symbolic and practical blow to US clean energy goals. Biden’s approval of projects like Empire 1 and Revolution Wind promised to transform the U.S. energy landscape, but Trump’s shutdown is shattering that vision, throwing states, companies, and workers into turmoil.

As the lawsuits pile up and political divisions deepen, the future of U.S. offshore wind—and with it, America’s clean energy goals—hangs in the balance. For Ørsted, the fight is about rescuing a $1.5 billion investment. For America, it’s about deciding whether to lead the global race to renewable energy or fall behind. The question is which way America will go!

the future of u s offshore wind and with it amer

With US clean energy goals under threat! it remains to be seen whether the U.S. will lead the global renewable energy race—or fall behind? Stay tuned to https://windnewstoday.com/ for the latest on offshore wind, clean energy policy.

New York Pulls Plug on Offshore Wind Transmission

Offshore wind transmission New York City halted amid Trump legacy

From WindNewsToday Staff | Source: Public Statements, New York post

Offshore wind transmission New York City halted amid Trump legacy — while nation’s largest offshore wind Farm is gaining momentum!

A tipping Point In The Wind

offshore wind is a stunning blow to the clean energy economy, the New York State Public Service Commission (PSC) is stopping the process for approving vital offshore wind transmission New York lines that is intended to deliver renewable electricity to the downstate region of New York City. The commission’s action, industry advocates say, is the single most severe blow so far to New York clean energy policy and climate goals — and they are placing the blame squarely on former President Donald Trump offshore wind opposition.

The PSC attributed the decision to federal uncertainty and Trump administration hostility toward offshore wind as the reasons for putting construction approvals on ice. The ruling, delivered with little fanfare but resonating mightily throughout the state’s energy sector, punctures New York’s signature climate law — the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act — which requires a power sector free of carbon by 2040 and a mix that includes 70 percent renewable energy by 2030.

John B. Howard a former PSC chairman nypost

“Offshore wind transmission New York Halted is significant,” said John B. Howard, a former PSC chairman. “The Climate Act is not operational. “We’re obviously going to be way past the emission deadlines.

The Trump Shadow Still Looms

New York clean energy policy once made the state a national leader in clean energy innovation. But the P.S.C.’s stepping on the brakes of transmission lines essential for offshore wind integration shows a structural weakness one that would have become clear if it became impossible to get the wind-generated electricity to where it is most needed, New York City and left those targets a pipe dream.

Offshore wind projects in the United States, which have long been stymied along the East Coast, are facing a critical, make-or-break moment as a flurry of developers push to bring the turbines to American waters. The United States was rushing toward its 2030 clean energy goals, even New York clean energy goals — delivering clean electricity to trillion NYC homes and creating thousands of renewable energy jobs — but several new federal policy reversals under the former president, Donald Trump, are progressing the opposite.

Just yesterday, California’s clean energy companies were warning of this. They urged Gov. Gavin Newsom and state lawmakers to act quickly in response to drastic changes to federal tax policy under Trump. Industry leaders said the revisions endanger billions of dollars in investments in renewable energy and could upend California’s ambitious clean energy goals.

And all of this anxiety comes hot on the heels of another huge blow — the U.S. Department of the Interior last Friday said it would stop fast-tracking approval for solar and wind projects on federal land. And now, the effects have landed in New York.

In a surprise move today, the New York State Public Service Commission, PSC halts wind transmission lines that would carry offshore wind power to New York City and downstate. Without this crucial infrastructure in place, the most ambitious offshore wind projects will be unable to deliver electricity to homes and businesses—and their promise will remain unrealized.

“For now, offshore wind remains a promise deferred in New York.”

New York offshore Wind Projects already in the queue or under contract will likely move forward, but without the necessary transmission assets, it’s unlikely that much more development or full scale expansion will take place. State officials say the decision to pause is calculated and temporary, a safeguard to protect ratepayers at a time of political and economic volatility. But with the flawed and shifting landscape of federal support, the long-term roadmap now seems even more nebulous.

About offshore wind transmission New York — South Fork Wind — a great example of New York offshore Wind Projects, just completed in spring 2024 with creating nearly 1000 green jobs in 5 states — would connect offshore wind farms in the Atlantic Ocean to substations in the New York City metropolitan area, are now in legal limbo. Without these projects, there would be no practical way to transport the energy even if offshore wind farms were built.

Energy sources say the decision has the state’s green energy law “in shambles,” and throws into question the future of offshore wind as a significant power source for downstate New York.

Ratepayer Risk Amid Federal Paralysis

Beneath the PSC’s order looms the fear that New Yorkers, stuck with higher utility rates to pay for infrastructure that may never be used, could be left holding the bag. Customers of gas and electric utilities would have covered the costs of the transmission lines — a long-term investment that was financially viable only if the offshore wind projects went forward.

But it’s the refusal of the Trump administration to grant new offshore wind leases and permits in its term that has paralyzed certain pivotal developments. The Biden administration has since resumed permitting, but the PSC remains leery, warning that future federal elections might return more opponents to power, threatening long-term projects.

“There is no time to wait. The lowest-cost energy future for New York will feature a significant complement of offshore wind,” Alliance for Clean Energy New York and New York Offshore Wind Alliance (NYOWA) said in a joint statement. “We need our state to invest in transmission infrastructure and bolster a grid that will be able to accommodate the increasing demand for energy and at the same time save ratepayers money over the long term.”

The two groups maintain that if nothing is done New York risks being left lagging in the national race toward clean energy supremacy.

Politics and Permits: Trump’s Lasting Influence

DSC 1313 aRGB High
Ørsted aims to create an ecosystem in which offshore wind and fishing can both thrive image: South Fork Wind Farm

The Trump administration’s wariness of offshore wind left a mark. Crucial permit freezes, regulatory barriers, and public resistance made for hostile local conditions for developers and financiers. And in the friendlier federal climate ushered in by President Biden, the scars remain, especially as at the state level, where projects take years to build and often require the support of many consecutive political administrations to finish.

New York Offshore wind projects can take more than a decade to develop — and that span frequently overlaps with tumultuous political cycles. Even small uncertainties can cause investment to freeze and execution to be postponed.

The PSC’s hesitation reflects that reality, and is not entirely unexpected given the political winds.

Hochul’s Balancing Act

Gov. Kathy Hochul, a longtime proponent of New York’s transition to renewable energy, had the PSC’s careful approach to the issue. And while saying she remained committed to clean energy and looking to shield ratepayers from financial risks associated with an uncertain federal support, an American Recovery Plan advocated the need for pocketbook protections.

“Governor Hochul has fiercely supported and remains committed to renewable energy projects, including offshore wind, but there is no doubt that, in this era of federal uncertainty, New York ratepayers need to be protected,” said Ken Lovett, her senior advisor for energy and the environment.

“In light of the political hostility to New York offshore wind projects from the federal government, and the consequent economic uncertainties surrounding such projects, we believe the PSC is correct that it would be unfair to burden ratepayers with the costs of a project that is not likely to produce any real benefits,” Lovett said. “When conditions are more favorable, we will be ready to proceed quickly.”

Offshore Wind Transmission New York Halted, Advocates React

The decision — PSC halts wind transmission lines, has been criticized by the clean energy industry as short-sighted. Advocates say that halting the development of new long-distance transportation now simply worsens the longer-term climate crisis, and that it lets fossil fuel infrastructure reign in the meantime.

Anne Reynolds Executive Director of the Alliance for Clean Energy New York Picsart AiImageEnhancer

“We appreciate concerns about cost — but inaction is even costlier: the cost of an increasingly damaged climate,” said Anne Reynolds, Executive Director of the Alliance for Clean Energy New York. “Delaying transmission is delaying progress.”

Trump offshore wind opposition decision by New York could cast a chill on the rest of the offshore wind industry in the Northeast at a time when states such as New Jersey, Massachusetts and Rhode Island are moving forward with their own transmission and wind deployment plans.

What’s Next?

For the moment, offshore wind lies as a promise deferred in New York. New York offshore Wind Projects that are already under contract can go forward, but there is little chance of further expansion to reach full scale without the “wires” to move the power. State officials emphasize that the pause is temporary and the result of strategy — the road ahead is hazier without more significant federal support, however.

The latest comes amid mounting frustration in the renewable energy industry. Now, offshore wind — long an iconic symbol of forward-looking climate ambition — is ensnared in a battle between state ambition and federal skepticism. Now, projects that require at least a decade of work to develop and build face a crucial question: Can they survive politics that are in a constant state of flux?

As climate deadlines loom and the demand for clean energy grows, the question is no longer whether the United States can lead the world in renewable energy — it’s whether it can regain lost momentum in time.

Can New York Catch the wind once again before it blows past?

Source — New York Post — https://nypost.com/2025/07/17/us-news/new-york-halts-offshore-wind-power-lines-citing-trump-opposition/

📌 For the latest on U.S. renewable energy policy, visit:

👉 WindNewsToday.com

What’s at Risk for California as Trump’s Clean Energy Rollbacks Threaten Billions in Investment and Jobs?

California Clean Energy

By: WindNewsToday Staff | Source: Reuters

California Clean energy companies across the state are calling on Governor Gavin Newsom and state lawmakers to act swiftly in response to sweeping federal tax policy changes under President Donald Trump that risk billions of dollars in renewable energy investments and prompt challenges to California’s clean energy goals.

In a letter that went out earlier this week, five major clean energy trade groups, including the California Wind Energy Association and Solar Energy Industries Association, recently warned that Trump’s newly passed Republican-backed tax and spending law is creating significant roadblocks for continuing and forthcoming solar energy investments and wind energy projects in the Golden State. These organizations allege that California’s standing as a global leader on climate is at risk without state-level action.

Federal Tax Credits for Renewables Risk Being Rolled Back

At the center of the anxiety is a provision in the new federal law that phases out important renewable energy tax credits, beginning after 2026, for projects that have not yet started construction. Projects that start after the deadline will need to be on-line by the end of 2027 to receive any remaining incentives.

Complicating the matter, Trump has ordered the U.S. Treasury Department to issue rules that would limit who can still qualify for these tax credits by which energy developers. This extra uncertainty makes it likely that dozens of utility-scale solar, wind and energy storage projects will now be delayed.

“These modifications introduce a new and grave risk of delay or outright cancellation for dozens of clean power projects,” the letter asserts. “We are pulling ahead and we are happy with the progress,” he said, “but without immediate reform at the state level, California’s clean energy investments — and the jobs that come with them — are at risk.”

California’s Clean Energy Goals

California has established some of the most ambitious climate and renewable energy targets in the world. The state recently said that more than two-thirds of its 2023 retail electricity sales qualified as coming from renewable and zero carbon-emitting sources, and all across onlookers struggle to cope with the speed at which it is leading the global energy transition.

Reversing federal support for California clean energy is in stark contrast to the state’s climate vision and clean energy policy agenda, including the mandate for 100% clean electricity by 2045. Many of those developers have already invested heavily in California’s energy infrastructure, from solar farms to wind energy projects to battery storage.

Trade Groups Urge California to Put It in a Higher Gear

In their letter, the five trade groups, which are the Large-scale Solar Association, California Energy Storage Alliance and American Clean Power Association (California chapter) called on the state to do four things:

  • Speed up approval for environmental permits and harmonies regulation for renewable energy schemes.
  • Expand clean energy purchasing, especially from utility-scale wind and solar developers.
  • Permit clean energy projects on farmland, which is underutilized for utility scale energy development.
  • Strengthen investment in grid infrastructure for managing higher levels of renewable energy tax credits and maintaining energy reliability.

If California can expedite these reforms, the groups say, the state can insulate itself from the consequences of federal rollbacks and maintain renewable energy momentum.

Wind Power in Texas Is Another Story entirely

"Wind energy turbines operating in rural California, threatened by federal tax policy changes"

While California is in limbo, in a tale of stark contrast, here’s what is happening in Texas wind energy projects policy. We have even seen Republican-majority states, such as Texas, achieve success developing the nations largest wind energy industry, not by government mandate but by offering market-based incentives and less onerous permitting processes that attract investment in renewable infrastructure.

Wind power’s growth in Texas is an example of how bipartisan support — or, at least, pragmatic policy — can help speed up the growth of clean energy. With federal support declining, California may soon have to turn to the Texas model of wind energy if the state wants to maintain its energy transition goals.

Jobs, Reliability and Clean Power Are at Stake

Not only does the rollback represent a major threat to renewable energy developers, but it threatens thousands of the clean energy jobs that exist. If projects get put on hold or canceled, the economic effect could reverberate across jobs in construction, operations, engineering and maintenance.

And the uncertainty threatens grid reliability, particularly as California confronts increasing power demands and the need to replace retiring fossil fuel plants with clean options. The rollback would imperil jobs, stability and progress toward California’s clean energy goals, according to the letter.

The state especially benefits from the clean energy sector. In 2023 alone, solar and wind projects led to the creation of thousands of high-wage jobs and investment in rural towns. This loss of momentum could have far-reaching consequences for both climate goals and long-term economic resilience.

California Clean Energy Developers Raise Alarms as Federal Support Fades

This is a pivotal moment in the energy transition in the United States. The Biden administration had sought to reduce the shift toward clean energy by broadening tax breaks in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) but the rollback by Trump would negate much of the push.

The decision to trump clean energy rollback the federal energy tax credit is viewed by many in the industry as a big step in the wrong direction. Developers worry the uncertainty of future regulatory environments could scare off investment, particularly in long-lead-time projects such as offshore wind or grid-scale storage.

Clean energy backers are imploring more Democratic states to draw up backup plans akin to what California wants to do in order to shield renewable energy development from swinging federal policy.

Conclusion: It Takes State Action to Protect Clean Energy Gains

As California goes forward, the decision is unmistakable: without urgent state action, the rollbacks in federal support for clean energy could stall crucial projects, shake investor confidence in the market and set back the state’s progress toward an energy future free from carbon.

The industry leaders’ letter sends a strong signal: Federal energy policy may be on its back foot, but states like California still have the tools in hand to protect and advance their visions of a clean power future — if they use them boldly.

The office of Gov. Newsom has not responded publicly. Yet the pressure to answer that question is getting louder, with billions of dollars in California clean energy investments on the line and California’s climate leadership in the balance.

📖 Source:

Reuters – https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/solar-wind-groups-seek-california-aid-after-trump-subsidy-cuts-2025-07-16/

📌 For the latest on U.S. renewable energy policy, visit:

👉 WindNewsToday.com

Trump Interior Department Pauses Fast-Track Solar and Wind Projects on Federal Land

Wind turbines on federal land facing new permitting rules under Interior Department policy directive by Secretary Doug Burgum in 2025. trump administration halts wind projects.

By: WindNewsToday Staff | Source: POLITICO

A New Roadblock: Personal Sign-Off Now Necessary to Approve Solar and Wind Projects on Federal Land

Trump Administration Halts Wind Projects on Federal Land! On a front the White House had hoped to leave untouched, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has been ordered to sign off personally on all solar and wind project approvals on federal lands, in a sweeping change that could upend plans to expand renewables development in the country, according to a confidential memo obtained by POLITICO.

The directive, transmitted Wednesday to staff at the Interior Department, applies a new level of vetting to clean energy projects and complexes on hundreds of millions of acres across this huge swath of federally managed land, including some of the most sun- and wind-rich patches in the country.

Bottleneck to Approving Permits Along Large Areas of Renewable Land

The memo — written by Gregory Wischer, Interior’s deputy chief of staff for policy — stipulates that Burgum must sign off on “all decisions, actions, consultations, and other work” on wind and solar projects. That includes:

  • Scoping reports
  • Access road authorizations
  • Cost recovery agreements
  • Construction permits
  • Environmental review stages

Such cradle-to-grave review would also allow the consideration of the greenhouse gas pollution and public health implications of the projects, officials familiar with the memo said, and could place a significant regulatory burden on billions of dollars of previous projects moving through the pipeline.

A Strategic Move Against Wind and Solar Growth

The directive would seem to fit into a larger effort by the Trump administration to reduce support for renewable energy. One recent executive order, signed earlier this month, declared a national energy emergency and asked federal agencies to do everything they could to bolster dispatchable energy sources—even though it didn’t include wind and solar on the list of power sources in that category, or no new solar and wind project approvals.

The federal land energy policy order also directs the Interior Department to review its existing policies to determine whether they give “preferential treatment” to renewables over traditional forms of energy like coal, gas and oil.

Effect on Trump Administration Halts Wind Projects on Federal Land

Now, federal lands energy policy generate some 4% of the U.S.’s renewable power, or about 8.9 GW, according to a 2024 report by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The research as potential for:

  • 5.75 TWp of utility-scale solar power
  • 875,000,000 acres of potential land based wind energy

When environmental and social are in line, the realistic output will narrow down to:

  • 1,750 GW for solar
  • 70 GW for wind

That remaining development potential is put at risk by the new Interior directive.

Expert: “This Will Paralyze Renewable Energy Permitting.”

Federal Permitting Council executive director Eric Beightel Picsart AiImageEnhancer
The former Federal Permitting Council executive director, Eric Beightel, who served under then-President Biden described the action as a “bureaucratic chokehold.”. Photo: linkedln

The former Federal Permitting Council executive director, Eric Beightel, who served under then-President Biden described the action as a “bureaucratic chokehold.”

“It will absolutely generate a huge amount of red tape that there is no way solar can move and wind can move at all fast or efficiency or even get over the line,” Beightel said to POLITICO.

“This is nakedly an effort to weaponize ‘the process.’

Interior Has Sharp Rebuke for Leaked Memo

In response to questions about the leaked memo, the Interior Department released a scathing statement:

“Let’s be clear: leaking internal documents to the media is cowardly, dishonest and violates professional standards,” a spokesman said.

“It’s a symptom of what is wrong in Washington today,” a spokesman for Mr. Cotton, James Arnold, said in a statement, adding, “It shows complete disregard for the hardworking people serving the American people.

Political Context: Bipartisan Support Turns to Administrative Clampdown

download 1 Picsart AiImageEnhancer
President Donald Trump, has frequently voiced opposition of certain renewable energy projects, advocation traditional sources.

But having signed the bipartisan 2020 Energy Act to encourage development of clean energy on federal lands, President Trump is now retreating with new policies that would hit America’s wind and solar sectors hard. His administration is working to rewrite what constitutes, it deems, a project’s construction start, which could cut off access to vital tax credits for renewable energy — and put great big wind and solar projects at risk. The newly enacted “Big Beautiful Act” comes wrapped in new layers of regulation empowering federal agencies to block or slow clean energy development. Critics say this turn of events is a bureaucratically engineered assault on renewables that is seeking to quietly choke clean energy with red tape. In a bitter irony — that one of the key components of the legacy of renewables support put in place by Trump is Trump himself, under pressure from House Republicans — the President aligned to derail the progress of the nation toward a renewable future.

The whole thing has confirmed for our readers what Trump’s recent wave of executive orders and legislation has already betrayed: a bedrock political philosophy born of an even deeper conviction that renewable energy can’t be trusted, a conviction consistent with his past complaints that wind turbines are unsightly and job-destroying. This, even though federal figures indicate that wind and solar now employ more Americans than coal mining and oil-and-gas extraction combined.

Should these policies persist, the U.S. even risks lagging behind global clean energy leaders, especially in wind-rich and solar-rich places such as the Southwest, Midwest and offshore East Coast.

What This Means for the U.S. Transition to Clean Energy

The action could hobble Biden-era ambitions to pull down utility-scale renewables across federal land even as the administration charts a path to 2035 clean energy goals.

The term “energy transition” alludes to the transition happening worldwide — that is, from dirty, polluting fossil fuels (namely coal, oil and gas) to clean, renewable sources, like wind, sunlight, water (in the form of hydro) and heat from the earth. It also comprises increasing energy efficiency, upgrading power grids and integrating electric vehicles, batteries and low-carbon technologies.

download 3 Picsart AiImageEnhancer 1
Trump administration halts solar and wind projects, implemented policies hat slowed the growth of wind and solar energy in the USA

And the transition to renewable energy and solar and wind project approvals isn’t simply an environmental necessity — it’s a strategic choice that will safeguard the nation’s economic and public health future. With fossil fuels still responsible for the majority of carbon emissions, the transition to clean energy — including wind and solar — is critical to addressing the threat of climate change and protecting the environment and the economy for future generations. Renewable energy also has national security benefits, by making the nation less dependent on imported oil and providing a more secure energy supply at home. Economically, the transition is an engine for job growth, with the clean energy sector expected to create millions of good-paying jobs across the country. And cutting air and water pollution gives a big boost to public health — to take just one consideration, we would have a lot less respiratory disease. As renewables become the cheapest source of power, families should get cheaper energy bills. By investing in clean energy now, we can keep the U.S. competitive in the global economy, drive innovation and secure an energy system we can rely on well into the future.

download 4 Picsart AiImageEnhancer
Trump energy policy emphasized fossil fuels

President Biden has articulated a strong goal that America be on a path to achieve 100 percent carbon pollution-free electricity by 2035 clean energy goals — a critical milestone on the way to net-zero emissions by 2050. This would involve spurring through more renewable energy like wind and solar, new plans for how to move electricity and invest in clean technologies. Under Biden’s plan, it’s crucial to use public lands as a place for staging large renewable projects — those that make meaningful contributions to our nation’s quest for energy independence and ability to lower utility bills, as well as stimulate job growth. The administration’s clean energy agenda is projected to create millions of union jobs, lower household energy bills and improve public health by slashing pollution. It will also be a long-term goal, aimed at not only addressing climate change but also seeing to it that clean, affordable energy is available to every American community: urban and rural, rich and poor. Now the Doug Burgum interior directive the renewable energy permitting delays and administration halts the solar and wind project approvals, altogether 2035 clean energy goals is far away to achieve.

The other danger is that if these policies stay in effect, the U.S. could very well fall grievously behind other global competitors in the market to scale green power production, given that we have more than 70 GW of land-based wind potential and more than 1,700 GW of solar power development technically available.

Lastly

About the federal land energy policy — this a War on Wind and Solar by Process not Policy. While no official nationwide ban on renewable energy has been offered, the combination of Interior Department control, tax credit reinterpretation and the passage of the Big Beautiful Act does suggest an increasing move against clean energy — not necessarily by outright ban, but by bureaucratic strangulation.

Even as Trump’s staff undercuts fairness and regulatory integrity, renewable energy permitting delays, people in the industry and the clean energy advocacy community are seeing the writing on the wall: a concerted effort to slow America’s clean energy future.

The memo – federal land energy policy, leaked on Friday is a sharp about-face for the Interior Department’s approach to solar and wind development and left some renewable energy advocates worried about the future of clean energy development on federal lands. Even though the memo itself has not been released to the public, the implications of its contents, first federal land energy policy reported by POLITICO, are already being felt and the clean energy industry.

📖 Source:

Politico – https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/16/interior-requires-burgum-sign-off-for-solar-wind-projects-00458999

📌 For the latest on U.S. renewable energy policy, visit:

👉 WindNewsToday.com

‘Big Beautiful Bill’ May Cast Shadow on U.S. Wind Energy Progress: Industry Looks at Uncertain Future

‘Big Beautiful Bill’ May Cast Shadow on U.S. Wind Energy Progress

One wind turbine can generate enough electricity to power nearly 1,000 homes. But because of the so-called “Big Beautiful Bill,” hundreds of those turbines might not rise — and America’s clean-energy momentum may fizzle.

Advertised as a patriotic remake of America’s energy policy, the proposal includes the passage of a Senate amendment that would slap punitive tariffs on the backbone the wind power industry in the US. While a proposed tax on wind and solar was dropped from the, the final bill still des the phase-out of clean energy tax credits, essentially swifter projects only have two years — until 2027 — to be up and running, or lose critical financial assistance.

That may seem like a small tweak. It isn’t. Wind projects, particularly large farms, take years of planning, permitting and investment. If the bill reduces the timeline, it is throwing sand in the gears of an industry that is creating jobs, cutting emissions and giving new life to rural communities across the country.

These aren’t theoretical losses. Up to 72 percent of planned clean energy installations are at risk of being delayed or canceled, analysts say. That means lost work for turbine technicians and manufacturers. Lost Income for Farmers Leasing Land. And higher energy costs for families that could have benefited from cheap, homegrown power.

Wind power is not a dreamer’s dream. It’s a tried and true engine of economic and environmental progress. Just ask Texas, the country’s wind leader, where conservative farmers and green advocates alike now re

America Stands at a Crossroads on Energy

For years, the United States has sought to be a world leader in wind power, putting millions of homes within easy reach of high plains and coastal breezes that can carry the electricity generated by wind turbines. But a bill now being readied in Congress — named in the tradition of energy nationalism, or more specifically, the “Big Beautiful Bill” — is poised to bring that progress to a grinding halt, or worse.

Hailed by former President Donald Trump as a major victory for “traditional American energy,” the Big Beautiful Bill is coming under fire from renewable energy experts, economists, labor unions, and business leaders for doing too much harm to the wind and solar industries. Critics say that the bill would overturn decades of bipartisan policy to promote clean energy and leave thousands of renewable projects hanging in the wind.

With far-reaching implications for clean energy tax credits, wind turbine manufacturing, energy prices and climate policy, it is on track to become one of the most significant — and contentious — energy fights of recent American history.

What Is the “Big Beautiful Bill”?

That bill, the “Big Beautiful Bill,” is a sweeping energy and tax reform package backed by Donald Trump, the former president, and some conservative lawmakers. Billed as a pro-American, pro–energy independence proposal, the bill is larded with clauses that:

  • Advance the sunset on clean energy tax credits, including the popular Production Tax Credit (PTC) for wind.
  • Limit wind and solar development that relies on imported components, particularly those from China.
  • Ramp up fossil fuel development, promising to lease out more federal territory for oil and gas drilling on public lands.
  • Diminish financial aid for new renewable energy initiatives that begin after 2027.

For good, the bill does not contain a proposed tax on wind and solar projects that was part of the negotiations a few weeks ago, although it still cuts by a relatively significant amount the time frame for the development of wind and solar power, which critics point out is no small thing.

How Wind Energy Works — Why Policy Matters

Wind power has become one of the cheapest and most readily scaleable forms of energy generation in the US. Today, one wind turbine can produce enough power for close to 1,000 homes year-round, and entire regions — looking at you, Texas and Iowa — now get a large fraction of their electricity from wind.

But wind projects — particularly utility-scale wind farms — are multi-year affairs that require planning and permitting, financing and construction. That’s what makes politically stable, long-term support so essential. And it’s true that programs like the Production Tax Credit (PTC), whose origins date back to the 1990s, have played a role in helping to make wind energy cost-competitive with fossil fuels.

The PTC generally extends a per-kilowatt-hour tax credit to developers over a period of 10 years for electricity produced from new wind facilities. Without these credits, many projects are dead on arrival — particularly through early-stage investment.

What Big Beautiful Bill Impact On Wind

Under the Big Beautiful Bill, only wind and solar projects that were fully operational by the end of 2027 would continue to be eligible for these federal clean energy tax credits. This small window is a serious challenge to the clean energy pipeline, as most wind projects have a 3–5 year timeline from conception to completion.

What’s at Stake?

From several clean energy analytics firms:

  • As much as 28 gigawatts (GW) of wind and solar projects in the works may no longer qualify for tax credits.
  • At least 72% of them are at risk of being delayed or dropped because of financing difficulties and political unpredictability.
  • Hundred billions of dollars of investment in clean energy industries could leave for countries with more predictable energy policy.

In practice, that could translate to fewer turbines in the ground, less clean energy on the grid and higher electricity bills for American consumers.

Wind Energy Jobs: A growing Sector Under Threat

Wind power has been among the fastest growing renewable energy job sectors in the United States. Wind turbine technicians have been in the top five fastest growing jobs for years now, and the industry has brought:

  • Construction teams and engineers working on wind farms.
  • Technicians maintaining the turbines.
  • Turbine blade, tower and nacelle factory workers.
  • Truck drivers and cranemen hauling equipment.
  • Landowners, especially those in rural America, who rent land for wind projects.

All of those economic dividends are endangered by Big Beautiful Bill. And the thousands of renewable energy jobs that might disappear if project development in states such as Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Iowa stalls. All this clean power brought suddenly home to a place many Americans have never seen.

Elon Musk, and Industry Leaders Slam the Legislation

Among the most outspoken opponents of the Big Beautiful Bill is Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who characterized it as “utterly insane and destructive legislation.”

“It’s just madness,” Musk took to X (formerly known as Twitter) to write. “This bill is an exercise in handouts to the industries of the past that punishes the industries of the future. It would obliterate the American worker.”

Musk’s denunciation echoes growing recrimination in the tech and clean energy sectors that the bill is more about short-term political gain than about the U.S. leading in energy over the long term.

In a statement released to the media, the American Clean Power Association (ACPA) decried the legislation as “a step backward for American energy policy” and said it would drive up electricity costs, kill jobs for Americans and set current climate goals in the country back.

States Most Affected

Republican lawmakers on both the left and the right have thrown their weight behind the bill, but its impacts may fall hardest on Republican-led states. Consider the following:

  • Texas is the wind energy capital of the country, with thousands of wind jobs.
  • Iowa and Oklahoma produce more than 40 percent of their electricity from wind.
  • With strong wind resources, Wyoming, Kansas and North Dakota are adding projects to their portfolio of wind projects.
  • South Dakota and Nebraska are growing wind powerhouses that are dependent on federal help.

In these rural states, wind power was not simply a partisan issue; it was one of revenue, job creation and pride. And the Big Beautiful Bill, for all its patriotic trappings, could undermine these local triumphs.

Energy Security and Climate Consequences

The bill comes at a time when global energy security is particularly salient, given the conflicts and supply shocks that have underlined the need for diversified, domestic energy sources.

Wind power provides:

  • Energy independence — It does not depend on unpredictable fossil-fuel markets.
  • Cheap power — The price of wind energy has declined more than 70% during the past decade.
  • Zero emissions —Wind is one of the most environmentally friendly sources of power on the planet.

The proposed “Big Beautiful Bill” comes at a time of extreme global energy policy peril — when energy security has never been more important, and the dangers of ceding ourselves to dependency on fossil fuels have never been more stark. Ongoing geopolitical tensions, disruptions to supply chains, and fluctuating prices of oil and gas have all made it clear that investing in a diversified set of domestically based energy resources, especially those that are invulnerable to foreign shock, is critically important. In that way, wind is one of America’s smartest energy sources and provides a trifecta: energy independence, low cost and no emissions. While fossil fuels are tied to wild global marketplace fluctuations and ripe for inflation, wind power is grown here in America, impervious to the foreign fix we face with oil. Wind energy costs have fallen more than 70% over the last 10 years, now making wind one of the cleanest and also cheapest electricity options on the market.

Across the Great Plains and along the coasts, wind turbines have become as familiar a part of the American landscape as fast food outlets and big box stores, silently turning in the breeze, and now they are powering millions of American homes, and stabilizing local energy grids, saving working families money along the way. Perhaps more important, wind is a driving force behind America’s climate action—emitting no greenhouse gases, no air pollution, and no hazardous waste.

Modern wind turbines generating clean electricity in rural America under threat from Big Beautiful Bill policy changes
Photo: nyt

Taking about Big Beautiful Bill impact on wind industry 2025, having policies that support wind power is more important than ever as the world continues to race toward carbon-free energy, and as world leaders from over 150 countries commit to climate goals and to protect future generations. But the Big Beautiful Bill risks reversing this progress, if it undoes hard-won clean energy tax credits and introduces policy uncertainty at exactly the wrong moment. Cutting support for wind projects not only delays the deployment of clean energy but also delivers a catastrophic signal to investors, developers and international partners — that the United States is not longer serious about being a global leader in clean energy. Just as Europe and China scale up investments in renewables and build secure energy supply, any retreat by the U.S. would be a step back from the front lines of climate and energy innovation.

This uncertainty is a huge financial risk for investors and less motivation to invest in long-term infrastructure. For domestic producers, it could portend canceled orders, closed plants and lost chances to take the lead in a fast-evolving sector. And for the world, it calls into question whether America can be trusted to honor its environmental commitments. With the climate crisis getting worse by the day — with record-breaking wildfires, hurricanes and droughts becoming annual events — the urgency to support proven technologies like wind energy has never been higher. Rather than retrenching, the U.S. should double down on renewables investments that enhance national security, create good-paying jobs and lower emissions.

Wind turbine-driven energy independence is not some fantastical vision of the future; it’s a real-time reality built through decades of bipartisan putting our money where our mouths are and private sector elbow grease. Sabotaging such progress with short-sighted legislation could have devastating implications, not only for the environment, but for America’s competitiveness in the global energy economy of the future. By pursuing the policies that enhance the stability and growth of renewables – like extending the Production clean energy Tax Credits, supporting grid modernization and providing investors confidence – the United States can help prevent wind being a key part of national resilience. Instead, enacting a bill that leads us backward and undermines the very foundation of our clean energy structure will only continue the cycle of dependence upon fossil fuels, raise consumer costs, and cede the United States away from its leadership position in this century’s global race to dominate climate and energy policy.

The decision facing lawmakers isn’t just one of subsidies versus tax schedules — it’s about whether the United States will be at the front of or at the back of the 21st-century clean energy race.

Farmers, Landowners and Local Economies Suffer

Not only will big developers lose — local communities will be the losers as well.

  • Farmers who rent land to wind developers receive steady, long-term income.
  • Rural counties earn tax revenue from wind projects.
  • Wind energy taxes provide direct funding to local schools, fire departments, and hospitals.

And if the Big Beautiful Bill stalls new wind energy industry in the US, these lifelines to rural America would dry up — while, ironically, hurting the same communities the bill purports to aid.

Clean Energy vs. Fossil Fuel: A False Dilemma?

The Big Beautiful Bill Fossil Fuel vs. Clean Energy incentives, supporters of the bill, they argue, need to return to their livestock, energy realism and “support American oil and gas.” But some critics say that is a false choice.

“We don’t have to choose between jobs at home and clean energy,” said a spokesman for the ACPA. “We can have both — and we must if we are to compete in the world.”

The U.S. can and should help all energy workers — but not by hollowing out the sectors creating jobs and energizing investment.

Policy Recommendations — What Needs to Change

Now that the Big Beautiful Bill is now making its way over to the House of Representatives, clean energy advocates are lobbying for key amendments, including that the:

The Pass the PTC Act would extend the production tax credit (PTC) for wind through at least 2032.

  • Save loan guarantees and investment tax credits for renewable energy developers.
  • Opposing export penalties targeted at the renewable component supply chain.
  • Preventing trade provisions that penalize American energy consumers.

Such policy changes would revive confidence among investors, stabilize the development pipeline and allow the wind industry to continue to play a part in the economy.

A Crossroads for the Future of U.S. Wind Power

The Big Beautiful Bill (as it’s called) may sound patriotic on paper — but it’s about the furthest thing from that the American wind industry can imagine.

With over 1.7 million jobs at stake, billions of dollars of investment in jeopardy, and long-term climate and energy security objectives at risk, this bill is a critical moment in the life of our country.

America faces a choice to lead the global clean energy transition, or lag in a world increasingly fueled by wind, sun and innovation.

As members of the House debate, one thing is certain: decisions they make in the coming weeks are likely to influence the U.S. energy landscape for decades to come.

The “Big Beautiful Bill” is a landmark for the wind energy industry in the US– one that has driven economic development, revitalized rural America, and provided clean energy to millions of Americans. Although couched in terms of a patriotic energy plan, the bill imposes a faster phase-out of the Big Beautiful Bill wind eenrgy tax credits expiration and restrictive policies that will block or delay the completion of hundreds of wind projects, including the loss of over 1.7 million American jobs in clean wind energy.

In the midst of a global momentum for clean power, America needs to carefully consider the long-term implications of this law. Keeping the wind at our backs is not only an environmental imperative — it is an economic imperative, and a major component of America’s energy security.

As the legislation travels through Congress, lawmakers will decide through a series of forks in the road whether the U.S. remains at the forefront of renewable energy innovation or lags behind in the clean energy race across the world. The fate of millions of workers, communities and the climate demands it.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the Big Beautiful Bill Impact On wind energy?

The Big Beautiful Bill is a proposed legislative package supported by former President Donald Trump that hastens the sunset of clean energy tax credits, which also extend to wind power. Only wind projects that are in service by the end of 2027 would be eligible for the Production Tax Credit (PTC), essentially setting back or even killing dozens of projects and threatening U.S. strides in renewable energy.

When would the wind energy tax credit expire under the Big Beautiful Bill?

Under the bill, wind energy tax credits would end in 2027. Any project that wasn’t up and running by Dec. 31, 2027, would lose eligibility for the federal Production Tax Credit, making it more difficult to secure financing and finish large wind farms on schedule.

How much clean-energy capacity is at risk from the new legislation?

As many as 28 gigawatts of planned wind or solar capacity could be put at risk, according to energy analysts, under the Big Beautiful Bill. Those projects may lose the critical tax credits and federal loan backing that helped launch them, halting the growth of clean energy in the United States.

What will the bill mean for renewable energy jobs?

The American Clean Power Association and labor unions project that if the wind tax credits lapse, over 1.7 million construction and manufacturing jobs could be lost. These losses would hit rural communities particularly hard, and states that have sunk billions of dollars in wind infrastructure, such as Texas, Iowa and Oklahoma.

What does the bill do for U.S. energy independence and climate goals?

The bill would damage U.S. energy independence by slashing incentives for domestic, clean sources of energy such as wind. It also puts the brakes on progress toward zero-emissions energy goals, sending a signal to global investors and allies that the United States might be pulling back at a time when other nations are accelerating investments in clean energy.

Can Congress overrule or alter the Big Beautiful Bill’s features?

Yes. The measure still needs to pass the House as well, and there’s a chance lawmakers could revive long-term tax credits for clean energy, extend eligibility timelines or add new givebacks to shore up renewable energy. Industry advocates are calling on Congress to act before long-lasting damage is inflicted on the wind energy business.

Why are permanent tax credits so critical for a wind project?

The process of planning, permitting, and constructing a wind energy project typically requires 3 to 5 years. Long-term, predictable tax credits such as the PTC provide developers and investors with the certainty to finance these multidecade projects. Abrupt changes in policy upset the entire development pipeline and sometimes lead to delays or cancellations.

How Trump Energy Policy is Killing 22 Offshore Wind Projects, $114B Investment

How Trump energy policy is Killing 22 Offshore Wind projects, $114B Investment

The offshore wind sector has been stagnant with federal leasing halted, tax credits eliminated and developers pulling out of core markets

President Donald Trump energy policy changes are putting America’s offshore wind industry in jeopardy, with more than 22 projects on hold and an estimated $114 billion in clean energy investments at risk.

The Biden administration has been making some dramatic strides in its push toward renewable energy, particularly wind power. Several offshore wind project policy decisions involving billions of dollars in investment, projects, and infrastructure were made before he took office. But Trump’s reversal of that Biden-era clean energy aid — along with an executive order suspending offshore wind leasing and permitting — has brought development along the East Coast to a near standstill. Energy experts warn that the stalling could hurt states’ climate goals and derail America’s renewable energy ambitions for the next decade, potentially costing billions of dollars.

Trump Energy Policy Halts Offshore Progress

On his first day in office, President Trump signed an executive order halting new and renewal approvals for offshore wind projects pending a full federal review. The order effectively withdraws federal waters from offshore wind leasing and suspends agency operations across multiple departments, including the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM).

Jonathan Elkind a senior research scholar at Columbia Universitys Center on Global Energy Policy Picsart AiImageEnhancer

While the review remains incomplete, the White House has declined to provide details or a timeline for a resolution.

“The result I fear is unexplained delays,” said Jonathan Elkind, a senior research scholar at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy. “There’s no transparency here.”

Permits revoked, projects canceled

Since the order, numerous wind projects have had their air permits revoked, environmental assessments delayed, and construction halted. As a result of regulatory uncertainty, a major offshore project in New Jersey has pulled out of its state power contract after the EPA’s decision to revoke its permit. France-based renewable energy developer EDF has formally withdrawn from its $5 billion Atlantic Shores offshore wind project in New Jersey, which was set to generate up to 1,500 megawatts of power, decarbonize the U.S. power grid, and provide clean electricity to more than 700,000 homes.

Industry data shows that 22 wind farms spanning states from Massachusetts to North Carolina are either on hold in the planning stages or have been pulled out of the pipeline entirely. In the New York Bay, once a centerpiece of Biden’s offshore wind campaign, at least two projects have been formally canceled.

The delays would affect about 22 gigawatts of planned capacity — enough to power millions of homes.

$114B Offshore Wind investments at risk

Natalie Gunnell a spokeswoman for Shells renewable energy division Picsart AiImageEnhancer
Natalie Gunnell, Shell’s renewable energy division imge: linkedln

According to an April analysis by BloombergNEF, the Trump’s energy policy changes have forced developers to pull out of projects that have yet to reach a final investment decision (FID). Without assurances of federal support, companies are delaying supplier contracts, canceling financing rounds and exiting joint ventures.

Shell and Equinor, the two largest investors in the sector, have already pulled out of key offshore developments in New Jersey. Shell has confirmed that it will not be building any new offshore wind projects in the United States.

“The commercial situation is no longer viable,” said Natalie Gunnell, a spokeswoman for Shell’s renewable energy division.

The Republican Party has moved to repeal the Clean Energy Tax Incentive.

The industry slowdown comes amid efforts in Congress to repeal key provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, including the Clean Energy Investment Tax Credit. Clean energy projects would have to begin construction within 60 days to qualify for the home-grown energy package, and would be phased out entirely by 2028.

The current Senate version drops the 60-day provision while maintaining the phase-out provision. Industry advocates argue that the proposed changes add another layer of uncertainty, further cooling investment.

“It’s creating an environment where financing and procurement deals are not moving forward,” said Harrison Schoeller, an offshore wind analyst at BloombergNEF.

Supply chain expansion stalls nationwide

Beyond the coast, the impact is being felt across the U.S. wind supply chain. For example, Siemens Gamesa’s plan to open a Virginia blade manufacturing facility in 2023 was canceled due to insufficient demand. Vestas’ proposed nacelle assembly plant in New Jersey has been quietly shelved.

As domestic suppliers retreat, future U.S. wind projects could become more reliant on imports—with developers facing potential tariffs on European components proposed by the Trump administration.

As a result, analysts estimate that production costs could increase by up to 25% over current policy conditions.

Climate Goals at risk

The United States is now expected to generate just 6.1 gigawatts of offshore wind power by 2030, 20% of the Biden administration’s original 30-gigawatt goal. Eleven states with offshore wind targets are unlikely to meet them, according to a project-by-project review by BloombergNEF.

“There’s been a chilling effect across the industry,” said Katharine Collins, president of the Southeastern Wind Coalition. “We’re seeing projects being scrapped and approvals being delayed nationwide.”

The impact extends beyond power generation. Thousands of green jobs, from technicians to engineers, are at risk in shipbuilding, steelmaking and port construction. State officials have begun revising energy roadmaps as the federal government restricts wind development.

South Fork Wind Farm

One example of Biden’s success in offshore wind projects is the name of South Fork Wind Farm. It is New York’s first commercial offshore wind farm and is considered a milestone toward meeting the United States’ 2030 renewable energy goals.

The 150-megawatt offshore wind farm is a groundbreaking project in the search for sustainable energy solutions. It is the first offshore wind project in the United States to connect to the national grid in 2024. It is one of the achievements of the Biden-Harris administration, symbolizing the 2030 wind policy.

Jointly owned by Danish multinational Orsted and US energy supplier Eversource, the wind farm has a capacity of 130 megawatts and can generate clean energy for more than 70,000 homes. It is a major step towards achieving New York’s goal of generating 70% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. Located about 35 miles off the coast of Montauk, the wind farm is expected to eliminate up to six million tons of carbon emissions over its lifetime, the equivalent of taking 60,000 cars off the road for the next 20 years.

South Fork Wind is providing more than 1,200 direct construction jobs and thousands more indirect and induced jobs. Hundreds of New Yorkers, engineers, electricians and conservationists are operating the South Fork Wind project. It aims to create thousands of long-term and temporary environmentally friendly jobs, support training programs, fund scientific research and provide opportunities for underserved communities.

Some Hope, But Not Clear

Despite the stalemate, a handful of offshore wind farms are under construction, including Empire Wind in New York, and are expected to be completed by 2027, adding about 5.7 gigawatts of power to the East Coast grid. But experts warn that these projects represent legacy investments from previous administrations, not signs of future progress.

“There are still opportunities here,” said Hilary Bright of the national offshore wind advocacy group Turn Forward. “But without policy coordination, those opportunities won’t materialize.”

The Bottom line

The future of offshore wind in the U.S. under the Trump’s energy policy with administration’s current energy strategy is highly uncertain. With billions in clean energy investments on hold and dozens of projects stuck in regulatory deadlock, the path to a low-carbon energy grid is narrowing. The U.S. is moving away from green policies, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and efforts to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Absent major federal policy changes or legislative compromises, America’s offshore wind projects ambitions will likely remain on hold for the next decade.