Wind energy policy and regulation directly influence project development, investment confidence, and long-term market growth. This category covers wind energy policies, regulatory changes, and government decisions across major global markets.
WindNewsToday explains how permitting rules, tax incentives, national energy strategies, and political decisions affect offshore and onshore wind projects.
Our policy coverage helps readers understand the real impact of regulatory shifts on the wind energy sector.
The Trump offshore wind pause marks a significant turning point for America’s clean energy transition. Citing offshore wind national security risks, the U.S. Department of the Interior announced that U.S. offshore wind leases have been paused for all large-scale projects currently under construction.
At the center of the decision is growing concern over offshore wind radar interference, which defense agencies warn could weaken the nation’s ability to detect real threats near critical East Coast population centers. The move raises urgent questions about whether offshore wind projects and national defense can safely coexist.
Table of Contents
Government Announcement: U.S. Offshore Wind Leases Paused
The Department of the Interior, working with the Department of War and other agencies, announced an immediate pause on large-scale offshore wind projects. The action affects major leaseholders and state partners while authorities assess the potential for mitigating national security risks.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum stated:
“The prime duty of the United States government is to protect the American people. This pause ensures that emerging national security risks are addressed before these projects proceed.”
Offshore Wind National Security Risks Explained
Radar Interference and “Clutter.”
One key concern is the interference from offshore wind radar, commonly referred to asradar clutter. According to unclassified U.S. government reports:
Massive turbine blades create moving reflections
Highly reflective towers distort radar signals
These distortions can obscure actual threats or generate false targets
The Department of Energy noted in a 2024 report that radar thresholds can be adjusted to reduce false alarms; however, this may increase the likelihood of missing real targets. More details are available at the Department of Energy – Wind Energy Technologies Office
Projects Affected
The following U.S. offshore wind leases have been paused:
Vineyard Wind 1 (OCS-A 0501)
Revolution Wind (OCS-A 0486)
CVOW – Commercial (OCS-A 0483)
Sunrise Wind (OCS-A 0487)
Empire Wind 1 (OCS-A 0512)
These projects represent billions of dollars in investment and are pivotal to East Coast renewable energy plans.
Defense officials warn that radar interference from offshore wind near these zones could reduce situational awareness and response capability, creating vulnerabilities as adversary technologies evolve.
Next Steps
Federal agencies will:
Review classified defense assessments
Collaborate with developers to explore mitigation measures
Decide whether leases can resume or require modifications
Potential solutions include:
Advanced radar-compatible turbine designs
Modified turbine layouts
Partial or permanent project cancellations
Implications for the U.S. Offshore Wind Industry
This pause introduces uncertainty for:
Investors
State renewable energy targets
Supply chains for turbine manufacturing
It also signals that future offshore wind development will need to carefully consider national security constraints, particularly near strategic defense zones.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
Last Updated: January 2026 Author: WindNewsToday Editorial Team
For nearly a decade, the promise of US offshore wind 2025 has oscillated between bold ambition and structural uncertainty. Yet as 2025 comes to a close, the narrative is quietly shifting. After canceled power purchase agreements (PPAs), inflation-driven cost resets, and supply chain disruptions, the US offshore wind industry is no longer stalled—it is recalibrating.
This moment matters because what once looked like stagnation in 2023–2024 has evolved into a more disciplined and resilient phase of development. Projects moving forward today are driven by realistic pricing, regulatory clarity, and execution-focused planning.
After years of uncertainty, 2025 marks a turning point for US offshore wind. Projects moving forward today will define the industry’s scale, cost structure, and credibility for the next decade.
Map of US offshore wind projects moving forward in 2025, Image: NREL
While headlines over the past two years focused on delays and developer exits, underlying industry data tells a more nuanced story.
By the end of 2025:
Federal offshore wind approvals reached record levels
Domestic supply chains stabilized after inflation shocks
Port infrastructure investments accelerated
Several major projects moved from planning into active construction
This is not a boom cycle. This is foundation-building for long-term offshore wind capacity in the United States.
US Offshore Wind Projects Actually Moving Forward (End of 2025)
Below is a project-by-project snapshot based on public progress updates, developer statements, and federal filings—summarized into clear, analytical insights.
Vineyard Wind remains the closest example of a stabilizing project. After slowdowns caused by weather windows and marine logistics, 2025 saw steady turbine installations and export cable integration.
Why it matters: It proves that large-scale offshore wind is technically deliverable on US coastlines despite early policy turbulence.
South Fork Wind — New York
South Fork Wind to Build the First-Ever American-Made Offshore Wind Substation. Image: South Fork Wind
Status: Fully operational Capacity: 132 MW
South Fork wind, NY’s first offshore wind farm and the first operational commercial-scale US offshore wind farm. Its full operation has given policymakers and investors something they critically needed: a domestic success story.
Key takeaway: South Fork’s operational uptime and grid performance are exceeding early expectations—something that strengthens the case for subsequent New York and New England procurement rounds.
Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) — Virginia
Offshore wind turbine Installation can take advantage of faster wind speeds off the coasts. Image: Installation Vessel Image: Dominion Energy
Status: Rapid advancement in foundation installation Capacity: 2.6 GW (full buildout)
Dominion Energy’s enormous CVOW project is the most structurally important development of 2025. The scale, engineering precision, and logistics coordination have become a national benchmark.
Why is it moving forward: Stable cost recovery mechanisms and long-term planning have allowed construction to proceed despite broader industry headwinds.
Empire Wind & Beacon Wind — New York
Status: Permitting clarified, contracts renegotiated, development back on track Developer:Equinor
After a turbulent period of contract restructuring, Equinor realigned its financing model and returned these projects to active development.
Signal to watch: New York’s procurement strategy has shifted toward realistic pricing and long-term grid planning—an essential correction.
Ocean Wind Area Developments (Post-Orsted Exit) — New Jersey
US offshore wind port construction showing heavy equipment and a staging area for turbine components. Image: Equinor
Status: Redevelopment phase Importance: High political visibility
Following Orsted’s withdrawal in 2023–2024, the area is now being revived through alternative partnerships and state-level interest.
Why this matters: New Jersey remains one of the strongest long-term resource zones. Developers understand this region will return—it’s a question of timing and cost structure, not viability.
Avangrid shifted these projects into revised bidding structures that better reflect current costs. Unlike cancellations seen in earlier cycles, these redesigns are strategic pauses, not project failures.
Key point: Developers are learning to price with real-world US supply chain realities—not European assumptions.
Floating Offshore Wind Progress — US West Coast
An offshore wind technician working on an undersea cable connection during the 2025 US offshore wind project
Status: Early-stage momentum but meaningful forward movement Regions: California & Oregon
The Pacific Coast remains early in deployment but is seeing real movement:
Port upgrades
Design partnerships
Federal planning zones
Commercial-scale deployment remains post-2029, but groundwork is finally visible.
Developers and analysts agree that the biggest differences between progressing and paused projects come down to three factors:
1. Contract Structure
Projects with flexible PPAs—or the ability to renegotiate—survived. Fixed-price contracts did not.
2. Supply Chain Readiness
Virginia, New York, and Massachusetts invested early in ports. This is now paying dividends.
3. State Procurement Strategies
States that adapted fast to inflation (MA, NY, VA) unlocked progress. States that waited (NJ earlier on) faced setbacks but are now recovering.
What This Moment Really Means for US Offshore Wind 2025
The US offshore wind industry has shifted from ambition-first to execution-first.
This reset was not a collapse—it was a correction.
Projects advancing today are stronger, better priced, and structurally aligned with long-term energy planning. If permitting clarity and infrastructure investment continue, the period from 2026–2030 is likely to resemble early-stage UK offshore wind scaling.
The projects moving forward now will form the backbone of the industry’s next decade.
Conclution
As 2025 comes to a close, the story of US offshore wind is finally shifting from uncertainty to direction. The early turbulence—contract failures, inflation pressures, supply chain delays—was not a collapse but a correction the industry ultimately needed. The projects advancing now are stronger, better structured, and far more realistic than the first wave of procurement.
Vineyard Wind 1 and South Fork have demonstrated that large-scale offshore wind is technically viable in US waters. Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind has shown how long-term planning and stable utility models can unlock multi-gigawatt progress. New York’s restructured projects reflect a more disciplined, cost-aligned development path. And even states that faced setbacks, like New Jersey, are beginning to reposition themselves for a more reliable next chapter.
The most important shift is not in the number of turbines installed, but in the maturity of the industry itself. After years of hype and volatility, the United States finally has an offshore wind sector built on measurable progress, phased construction, and credible economic value. That foundation will shape everything that happens from 2026 to 2030.
If policymakers remain consistent and developers continue designing with real-world costs, the next decade will move the US from an emerging offshore wind player to a global competitor. The reset is over—and the rebuilding has begun.
FAQ
Q: Why is US offshore wind 2025 important?
A: 2025 represents a turning point as projects move forward with realistic pricing, regulatory clarity, and execution-focused planning.
Q: Which factors affected offshore wind progress before 2025?
A: Delayed PPAs, inflation-driven cost resets, and supply chain disruptions slowed development in 2023–2024.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
With 99% renewable energy and a 98% emission cut, Ørsted Green Transformation build a new benchmark for the energy sector
With global leaders meeting in Brazil for COP30, Ørsted has reached a historical milestone, becoming the world’s first energy company to complete a full green transformation.Since 2006, Ørsted has cut its carbon emissions by 98%. The company moved away from heavy fossil fuel use to become a world frontrunner in offshore wind and renewable energy. Now, 99% of Ørsted’s energy comes from renewable sources, setting a standard for cutting carbon in the energy world.
With the science-based targets guiding its journey, Ørsted carbon emissions reduction success shows that renewable energy milestones are highlighted and how important renewable energy and offshore wind are for meeting global climate targets.
Table of Contents
How Ørsted Green Transformation achieved
Ørsted’s big accomplishmentis the result ofmore than a decade of strategic efforts across its business. The company used several ways to lower pollution and switch to renewable energy:
Switching to Renewables: Ørsted now generates 99% of its energy from renewable sources like wind, solar, and biomass.
Ending Coal Use: They shut down their last coal power plant in 2024 and changed their remaining power plants to use biomass.
Selling Fossil Fuel Assets: Ørsted sold its oil and gas business to get rid of fossil fuels.
Electrifying Vehicles: The company switched to electric vehicles and equipment to lower pollution.
Growing Offshore Wind: Ørsted built 18.5 GW of renewable energy capacity, with offshore wind being a leader in renewable energy.
Using Renewable Certificates: The company used renewable energy certificates to cover its own energy use, making sure its operations don’t produce carbon.
The fact is, Ørsted’s pollution levels dropped by over 98% compared to 2006, reaching just 4 g CO₂e/kWh.
Ørsted’sRoleinGlobalClimate Leadership
Ørsted’s achievement presents more than a business win; it showsa big changein the energy world.
World First: Ørsted is the world’s first energy company to completely switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy.
COP30: This renewable energy milestone lines up with COP30 in Brazil, which stresses how important it is to act on climate change and lower emissions.
Global Example: Ørsted carbon emissions reduction journey sets an example for other energy companies seeking science-based decarbonization
Focus on Scopes 1-3: The company’s plan to reach net-zero includes emissions from suppliers and customers, like steel, copper, and ship fuels.
Quote from Ingrid Reumert, SVP for Global Stakeholder Relations,
“Cutting carbon emissions is what Ørsted is all about. With 99% of our energy from renewable sources and a 98% cut in emissions, our green move is now done.”
Roadmap to Net-Zero by 2040
Ørsted isn’t stopping at the 2025 milestone. Their plan to reach net-zero by 2040 focuses on:
Reducing Remaining Emissions: targeting emissions in upstream and downstream operations.
Decarbonizing the Supply Chain: Methodically cutting emissions from materials like steel and copper, and also from maritime fuels.
Partnership: collaborations with industry partners to scale renewable energy use.
Offshore Wind Leadership: Continuing to grow in main markets for clean power growth.
Working with Policymakers: Pushing for stable and appealing government policies to encourage large investments.
Quote from Reumert:
“Quickly switching to renewable electricity is important to meeting climate goals. Businesses and governments need to team up to secure a clean energy future.”
Key takeaways—Ørsted Green Transformation
Ørstedisthe world’s firstenergy companyto go green.
They’ve cut their direct carbon emissions by 98%.
99% of energy production is now from renewable sources.
They’ve built 18.5 GW of renewable capacity, mostly offshore wind.
Science-based targets guide their net-zero strategies for 2040.
This proves that big changes are possible in the energy business
Conclusion
Ørsted’s shift from a utility dependent on fossil fuels to a top global renewable energy leader is a landmark event for the energy industry. With a 98% drop in emissions and 99% renewable energy milestone generation, Ørsted is a role model for corporate climate actions.
Given the urgency for emissions cuts at COP30, Ørsted’s green shift shows that energy firms can guide the world to a sustainable,carbon-neutral future through clear, science-based goals, innovative strategies, and investment in renewable tech. Becoming an offshore wind leader and the renewable energy revolution aren’t just dreams anymore—Ørsted Green Transformation is now a worldwide standard for achievement.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
That’s right—from 2010 to 2023, Britain’s investment in clean, indigenous wind power has paid off massively, with gas and electricity prices falling dramatically.
A UCL wind power study shows that wind power has saved electricity bills by £14.2 billion and natural gas prices by £133.3 billion. And astonishingly, after paying out £43.2 billion in green subsidies, the country is celebrating being £104.3 billion ahead—a significant win for the UK, both for the economy and the environment.
Needless to say, in the 13 years between 2010 and 2013, the UK’s wind power capacity grew from just 5 terawatt-hours (TWh) to 80 TWh, accounting for almost 30% of total electricity generation. This has driven gas generators out of the market and directly reduced electricity prices for millions of customers.
Table of Contents
Wind power UK: From humble beginnings to national power
In 2010, the UK was generating just 5 terawatt-hours (TWh) of wind power. In 2023, this figure is expected to grow to 80 TWh, providing around 30% of the country’s clean electricity on the national grid.
Researchers argue that this rapid growth has not only boosted clean electricity—showing the world that clean power is not just a fantasy—it has also pushed gas generators out of the market forever, reducing pressure on demand for one of the world’s most important fuels and lowering prices for both households and businesses.
Lead author Colm O’Shea, from UCL Geography, put the finding in perspective:
“Far from being a financial burden, this study shows how wind power has consistently delivered substantial financial benefits to the UK. This £104 billion net benefit is more than the £90 billion extra the UK has spent on gas since the war in Ukraine in 2021.”
Next, rather than focusing on short-term subsidies or market fluctuations, the study shows how wind power has reshaped the UK’s entire energy landscape—from delivering sustainability, affordability, and security. The researchers argue that wind power should be considered a public good, like roads or schools, where shared government support leads to national prosperity.
“Energy transition is not an expensive environmental luxury,” the authors write. “It is a sound financial investment that strengthens our economy while protecting our planet.”
Experts agree: It’s time to reward renewables
Professor Mark Maslin, co-author and leading climate scientist at UCL, believes the time has come for market reform:
“The UK government needs to double the price of gas and electricity. Gas should follow the global market, while electricity prices should reflect real savings from wind and solar.”
Anna Musat, policy director at RenewableUK, highlighted the importance of homegrown renewables:
“The only way to sustainably reduce energy costs is to reduce our exposure to volatile global fossil fuel prices and increase clean, domestic electricity generation.”
Their message is clear: wind power is not just good policy—it’s smart economics. Meanwhile, Will Glover of Gowling WLG sees this finding as a wake-up call for policymakers:
“This research reinforces the case for accelerating renewable investment. The scale of savings highlights the strategic value of wind power—not just for energy security, but for financial stability.”
Professor Christopher Vogel of the University of Oxford has another impressive piece of information:
UK wind power turbines pay for their production and installation in just 12-24 months and continue to generate clean electricity for up to 25 years—a return on investment that most industries can only dream of.
Wind Power UK’s journey is an incredible tale of foresight, creativity, and enduring influence. Wind power has completely changed the UK energy market landscape in just over ten years, demonstrating that renewable energy sources do more than just power homes; they also reduce costs, generate employment, and ensure a cleaner future.
What happens when a nation commits entirely to wind power?
Here’s a powerful answer from the story of Wind Power UK — a country that has built on ambition, innovation and real-world evidence of rewards.
In just over a decade, the UK has transformed its energy system, built on its trust, built on its commitment and today shows the world how renewable energy can reduce costs, create green jobs and strengthen energy independence. The result has been savings of more than £104 billion for UK consumers since 2010 — a milestone that is reshaping energy thinking globally.
Why does it matter now?
Because Wind Power UK’s success is not just a national achievement — It is a message and a lesson for a global community. The thought-provoking question is if the UK can save billions by embracing wind power, what could the US, Germany or Japan achieve with a similarly bold commitment to clean, indigenous energy?
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam — In a strategic move to strengthen its position in the fast-growing renewable energy market in Vietnam, Refrigeration Electrical Engineering Corporation (REE Energy) has announced the establishment of two new subsidiaries dedicated to developing wind power projects in southern Vietnam. This initiative marks another major step in REE’s long-term ambition to become a leading renewable energy investor in Vietnam.
Table of Contents
REE’s New Subsidiaries Powering Vietnam Wind Power Ambitions
According to the company’s latest board resolution, REE Duyen Hai 2 Wind Power Co., Ltd. and REE Duyen Hai 3 Wind Power Co., Ltd. will spearhead the development of phase two nearshore wind power projects in Vinh Long province.
REE Duyen Hai 2 will oversee the V1-3 phase-two wind power plant, with a projected investment of VND2,260 billion ($85.79 million), including VND677 billion ($25.7 million) in equity.
REE Duyen Hai 3 will manage the V1-5 and V1-6 phase-two wind farms, with a total investment of VND3,860 billion ($146.53 million).
Both companies will be fully owned and funded in cash by REE Energy and are expected to complete investment by Q4 2025. The projects are designed to enter commercial operation by late 2026, contributing an estimated 80 MW of clean power to the grid.
According to Vietcap Securities, Vinh Long Wind projects could generate VND123 billion ($4.67 million) in post-tax profit, with an average selling price of 7.7 US cents/kWh, potentially driving 10% of REE’s earnings growth by 2027. The projects boast an internal rate of return (IRR) of 11.8%.
Vietnam Wind Power Transformation: From Policy to Progress
Vietnam has become one of Asia’s most ambitious wind power nations, targeting 6–17 GW of offshore wind capacity by 2030–2035 and 26–38 GW of onshore capacity by 2030.
The country’s Ministry of Industry and Trade recently issued Decision 1508/QĐ-BCT, raising tariff caps for wind energy—by 18% for onshore and 9% for nearshore projects—providing new financial incentives for investors like REE.
Phu Lac 2 Wind power project Vietnam with 48 MW capacity, Location: Tra Vinh Provience, Image: REE
REE’s current renewable portfolio already includes successful projects such as Tra Vinh V1-3, Phu Lac 2, and Loi Hai 2, all operational since 2021. These wind farms benefit from fixed preferential FiT rates of US 9.8 cents/kWh for offshore and US 8.5 cents/kWh for onshore projects for 20 years.
Vietnam’s wind energy developments now contribute approximately 90,000 MWh of clean electricity annually to the national grid, powering 48,000 households and reducing CO₂ emissions by about 72,000 metric tons every year.
Why This Matters
REE Energy was Vietnam’s first company to transform from a state-owned enterprise into a public company under equitization in 1993 and became the first listed company on the Vietnam Stock Exchange in 2000.
Its proactive shift into wind and solar investmentsacross the Mekong Delta and central regions reflects Vietnam’s wider vision of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. With these two new wind subsidiaries, REE is not only diversifying its energy assets but also reinforcing its role as a driving force in Vietnam’s renewable energy revolution.
Vinh Long Wind Project Key Takeaways
Company: REE Energy (HoSE: REE)
Projects: V1-3, V1-5, V1-6 Wind Power (Vinh Long Province)
Capacity: 80 MW (phase-two nearshore wind)
Total Investment: ~VND6,120 billion (~$232 million)
Expected ROI: 11.8%; 10% contribution to 2027 earnings
National Goal: 6–17 GW offshore & 26–38 GW onshore wind by 2035
Conclusion: Vietnam’s Renewable Energy Future Gains Momentum
As Vietnam continues to modernize its power mix, REE Energy’s expansion symbolizes the next phase of clean energy leadership. With the new subsidiaries and favorable tariff policies, the country is well on track to becoming a major player in the global wind energy landscape—fueling sustainable growth, cleaner air, and a stronger green economy for generations ahead.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
The global renewable energy market is bracing for turbulence as President Donald Trump offshore wind policy sends shockwaves through the industry. According to a new report from the International Energy Agency (IEA), the forecast for global offshore wind capacity growth has been cut by more than 25% over the next five years—a direct result of the Trump administration’s renewed push for fossil fuels and tightened restrictions on clean energy projects.
Table of Contents
U.S. Policy Shift Alters Global Renewable Trajectory
The IEA’s revised outlook paints a stark picture: the forecast for renewable energy generation between 2025 and 2030 is now 5% lower than last year’s estimate, with the U.S. share slashed by nearly 50%.
Renewable capacity expansion changes from Renewables 2024 to Renewables 2025 in selected countries or regions, 2025-2030, Image: IEA
Trump renewable energy policy changes really dragged things down. Take the offshore wind industry outlook, for example.
Developers lost federal tax credits sooner than expected.
The government stopped offering new offshore wind leases.
They also put a lid on permits for wind and solar projects on federal land.
Plus, import restrictions made it harder to get wind turbine parts and rare-earth materials.
All of this led to canceled projects, delays, and lots of nervous investors—renewables in the U.S. took a real hit.
Offshore Wind Industry Faces a 25% Growth Collapse
Offshore wind has taken the hardest hit—once the pride and joy of America’s clean energy push, now it’s losing momentum fast. The IEA says offshore wind capacity growth is 25% less than they thought just a year ago. That’s a big drop. Developers like Ørsted, RWE, and Equinor aren’t just talking about slowing down.
They’ve actually cut their 2030 goals for new offshore wind forecasts, blaming higher costs, endless waits for permits, and a wave of new federal rules that have spooked the whole industry.
“The new Trump renewable energy policy changes everything,” one analyst said. “It threatens to wipe out years of progress in offshore wind, right when the U.S. was finally starting to catch up to Europe and China.”
China Surges Ahead Despite Policy Adjustments
While the U.S. pulls back, China just keeps pushing forward. Right now, it’s driving about 60% of the world’s growth in renewable power. China did slow down a bit when it dropped fixed tariffs and switched to competitive auctions, but that pause didn’t last long. The country’s still set to hit its 2035 wind and solar goals five years ahead of schedule.
When you look at the two biggest economies side by side, the gap in clean energy leadership just keeps getting wider.
Weighted average net margins of renewable energy companies in China, Q2 2023-Q2 2025. Source: IEAWeighted average net margins of renewable energy companies excluding China, Q2 2023-Q2 2025 Source: IEA
Trump’s Fossil Fuel Agenda Returns
The IEA report also notes that President Trump’s return to the White House in January for a second term has brought with it a clear shift in energy priorities. Trump has pledged to expand oil, gas, and coal production while arguing that renewables are “too costly and unreliable.”
Critics warn that such a stance could undermine America’s climate commitments and job growth in the renewable sector. Offshore wind projects—particularly those planned off the East Coast—are already facing multi-billion-dollar setbacks.
Global developers are hitting pause on U.S. expansion.
Investors and energy companies are pulling back, shifting their focus to Europe and Asia, where the rules are clearer and governments are still offering strong support.
“Uncertainty is the biggest threat,” one senior executive from a European renewable firm said. “When policies flip-flop, it’s almost impossible to plan for the long haul.”
States like New York and Massachusetts aren’t giving up—they’re trying to keep their offshore wind projects alive on their own. But without help from the federal government, they’re staring down delays and shrinking incentives, especially with Trump’s latest stance on renewables.
The Broader Impact on Clean Energy Ambitions
Cutting offshore wind targets by 25% isn’t just about fewer turbines in the water. It means thousands of jobs lost, billions in investment slipping away, and progress on emission goals stalling. Industry experts don’t mince words: offshore wind is essential for hitting net-zero targets.
It’s one of the few options for large-scale, reliable clean energy. If this slowdown drags on, expect ripple effects—supply chains strained, ports underused, and coastal economies taking the hit.
Outlook: Can the U.S. Regain Momentum?
The short-term picture looks rough, but there’s still hope for the U.S. offshore wind industry. If the political winds shift before 2030, things could turn around. Both sides of the aisle care about energy security and local jobs, so there’s a real chance for new growth. Right now, Trump’s offshore wind policy marks a big shift.
It’s not just changing the path for clean energy in the U.S.—it’s shaking up the global race for renewables, too. Want the latest on U.S. offshore wind, global investments, and what’s next for the offshore wind industry outlook?
Follow U.S. Wind News for real-time updates and expert takes.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
A major shift in the UK’s clean energy landscape is coming—and it’s set to center on how China’s $2 billion wind turbine investment in Scotland could reshape the country’s renewable ambitions.
Chinese wind giant Ming Yang Smart Energy has proposed building a massive turbine manufacturing facility at the port of Ardshear in the Scottish Highlands, promising 1,500 new Scotland renewable energy jobs and a new industrial ecosystem for offshore wind manufacturing generation.
While the plan could boost the UK’s renewables supply chain, it has also raised concerns within Whitehall about national security and foreign investment in vital energy infrastructure. Let’s find out why.
Table of Contents
$2 Billion Wind Turbine Investment UK
Ming Yang says its proposed Scottish factory would represent a multi-phase investment of around £2bn (£1.5bn). The first phase—expected to start production in late 2028—will cost around £750m and will focus on producing advanced turbines for the European market.
In the next phase, the company plans to build a complete offshore wind industry ecosystem, including supply chain partners, training programs, and research facilities.
Ming Yang chairman Zhang Chuanwei called the project a “commitment to accelerating the global energy transition through innovation and community-centric energy solutions.”
UK government hesitation over Chinese wind investment
Despite Ming Yang’s public optimism, the UK government has yet to approve the plan.
A senior UK government source said the company “seems to be trying to outmaneuver us,” insisting that national security concerns should be fully assessed before any approval is given.
A UK government spokesman confirmed the latter and cited:
“This is one of a number of companies looking to invest in the UK. Any decision taken will be consistent with our national security.”
The government’s delay is said to be due to intelligence and security reviews surrounding the involvement of foreign technology in the UK’s energy infrastructure—particularly in light of tensions over China’s strategic role in key sectors.
Scotland’s renewable energy vision and industrial strategy
However, the Scottish government sees the proposed project as strategically important.
First Minister John Sweeney has repeatedly said that floating offshore wind is “central to my vision for Scotland’s future as a modern and dynamic nation.”
Edinburgh officials argue that the Ardersea project is fully aligned with Scotland’s industrial strategy, which identifies floating wind turbines as a “first-mover advantage” sector. With more than 40 gigawatts of potential offshore capacity—including 25 gigawatts of floating wind—Scotland sees Ming Yang Investment UK as crucial to achieving its renewable energy expansion goals.
The Scottish Government, however, views the proposed project as strategically important. First Minister John Swinney has repeatedly said that floating offshore wind is “central to my vision for Scotland’s future as a modern and dynamic nation.”
Officials in Edinburgh argue that the Ardersier project aligns perfectly with Scotland’s industrial strategy, which identifies floating wind turbines as a “first-mover advantage” sector. With over 40 GW of potential offshore capacity—including 25 GW of floating wind—Scotland sees Ming Yang’s investment as critical to realizing its renewable energy expansion goals.
Economic Promise vs. Political Risk
While supporters highlight the 1,500 jobs, technology transfer, and offshore wind capacity expansion, critics warn about overreliance on Chinese manufacturing. Some MPs and U.S. officials have urged caution, noting that even though Ming Yang is privately owned, Chinese companies can face state influence under Beijing’s policies.
A government insider described the approval process as “delayed but deliberate,” adding that “patience is finite—there’s a lot of investment and jobs waiting for this decision.”
Meanwhile, Kate Forbes, Scotland’s Deputy First Minister, said there remains “room for Ming Yang to open a factory in Scotland,” stressing that final approval rests with the UK government.
What’s Next
A government official recently told the Financial Times that a decision on the Ming Yang project is “imminent.” If approved, construction could begin as early as 2026, with the factory fully operational by 2028, producing turbines for projects across the UK and Northern Europe.
However, the project’s fate will depend on how London balances economic opportunity, energy security, and geopolitical caution—three pillars shaping the UK’s clean energy policy.
Conclusion
As the UK strives to become a global clean energy leader, the debate over how China’s $2 billion wind turbine investment in Scotland continues to test the balance between sustainability and sovereignty.
Whether seen as a bold step toward green industrialization or a risky geopolitical gamble, the outcome will reveal how open Britain truly is to global partnerships in its clean energy future.
FAQ
Q1: What is the value of China’s wind turbine investment in Scotland? The proposed investment is up to $2 billion by Ming Yang Smart Energy to build a large-scale wind turbine manufacturing facility.
Q2: Why is this project controversial? Concerns revolve around national security, foreign influence, and the strategic control of energy infrastructure.
Q3: What benefits does the project offer Scotland? It could create hundreds of local jobs, boost offshore wind supply chains, and support Scotland’s 2045 net-zero target.
Q4: When could the project start? If approved, construction could begin by 2026, with turbine production starting around 2028–2029.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
Europe’s biggest renewable energy producers—Spain, France, and Germany—have cut back record amounts of wind power this year, as electricity grids struggled to handle an unprecedented surge in renewable output. (Bloomberg News)
From January to September 2025, these nations, along with southern Sweden, recorded the steepest declines in wind generation, according to data from the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG).
—highlight The curtailments—the deliberate reduction of renewable generation—highlight a growing problem for Europe’s clean energy transition. While the region rapidly expands its wind and solar capacity, grid investments and storage systems lag far behind.
Table of Contents
Why It Matters
Curtailment happens when the power grid cannot absorb all the renewable energy being generated. In such cases, some wind farms are ordered to shut down, while others voluntarily reduce production when prices drop too low.
These shutdowns represent a significant loss of clean energy potential and often translate into higher costs for consumers, as grid operators compensate producers for lost generation.
Energy analysts warn that these record levels of curtailment reflect a structural challenge in Europe’s renewable rollout: generation capacity is growing faster than transmission infrastructure can handle.
“We’re producing more renewable energy than the grid can transport,” said one analyst familiar with the LSEG data. “Without faster grid upgrades, much of that green power will continue to go to waste.”
Country Highlights
📊 Spain recorded the highest rate of wind curtailment this year, cutting 19.6% of total generation in May—three times more than in the same month last year.
🇫🇷 France saw a record decline in August, with 11.2% of wind energy curtailed. 🇩🇪 Germany, Europe’s renewable powerhouse, reported its largest reduction of 7.3% in March.
Western Denmark also saw a modest decline, while the U.K. was not included in the dataset.
The Bigger Picture
The issue reflects a paradox in Europe’s green energy push: the continent is producing more clean electricity than ever, yet wasting more of it due to outdated infrastructure.
Rapid renewable expansion without parallel investments in storage, smart grids, and cross-border interconnections could undermine progress toward net-zero goals.
Experts stress that solving the grid bottleneck is essential for ensuring every megawatt of renewable power is used effectively—rather than being shut off during peak production.
What’s Next
European policymakers are under increasing pressure to accelerate grid modernization and battery storage investments. The European Commission has identified grid congestion as a top priority for achieving its 2030 renewable targets.
In the meantime, wind power curtailments are expected to remain high through winter 2025, as strong seasonal winds meet limited grid capacity.
If grid upgrades lag further behind, Europe could face not just wasted clean power but also higher energy costs and a slower decarbonization pace.
Conclusion
Europe’s wind energy success story now faces a critical challenge: turning record renewable generation into usable power. Without urgent infrastructure investment, even the cleanest energy will continue to be curtailed — and the continent’s climate goals could drift further out of reach.
FAQs
1. Why are European countries cutting back on wind power?
European nations like Spain, France, and Germany are reducing wind generation because their power grids can’t absorb excess renewable electricity. When supply exceeds grid capacity, operators deliberately shut down turbines to prevent overloads — a process known as curtailment.
2. What does “wind power curtailment” mean?
Curtailment is when wind or solar energy production is intentionally reduced or stopped, even though the source is available. This happens when the grid is overloaded or electricity prices drop too low to sustain operations.
3. Which European countries are most affected by curtailment?
According to LSEG data, Spain, France, and Germany recorded the highest levels of curtailment in 2025. Spain cut nearly 20% of its wind output in May, France reduced 11% in August, and Germany 7% in March.
4. How does wind power curtailment affect consumers?
Curtailment can raise consumer energy costs because grid operators often compensate power producers for lost generation. It also wastes renewable energy that could otherwise replace fossil fuels.
5. How can Europe reduce wind power curtailment?
Experts recommend expanding grid capacity, investing in battery storage, and improving cross-border energy connections. These upgrades will help Europe store or transmit excess wind energy instead of wasting it.
6. Will wind power curtailment slow Europe’s clean energy goals?
If not addressed quickly, yes. Curtailment reduces the effective use of renewable energy and could delay Europe’s 2030 clean energy and net-zero emission targets. Modernizing the grid is key to maintaining momentum.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
Danish renewable energy leaderØrsted Hornsea 3 is reportedly preparing to sell a 50% stake in its flagship Hornsea 3 offshore wind project to US investment firm Apollo, highlighting the financial and political pressures shaping the global wind sector. Sources familiar with the negotiations said the £8.5 billion project, located 160 km off Yorkshire and 120 km off Norfolk, is expected to generate 2.9 gigawatts of clean energy—enough to power more than three million UK homes.
Table of Contents
Ørsted Hornsea 3 Plans $5.5B Stake Sale
The decision to sell stems from mounting financial pressures. Rising construction costs, global supply chain disruptions, and investor hesitancy in US projects have all strained Ørsted’s balance sheet. While European governments remain broadly supportive of renewable energy expansion, US policy uncertainty—particularly stemming from the Trump administration’s historical skepticism of offshore wind—has created challenges for US projects such as Sunrise Wind off the East Coast. Analysts say selling a stake in Hornsea 3 is a strategic step to secure funding for future offshore projects while managing risk.
Ørsted aims to raise at least DKr35 billion ($5.5 billion) through asset sales, including Hornsea 3, a Taiwanese offshore wind project, and its European onshore business. Additionally, the company is seeking around DKr60 billion from shareholders through a rights issue. These combined measures reflect the growing complexity of financing large-scale renewable energy projects while navigating global economic and political pressures.
Hornsea 3 Wind Farm is not just another offshore wind project; it is a symbol of the industry’s ambition. Part of the Hornsea zone, it follows Ørsted’s Hornsea 1 (1.2 GW) and Hornsea 2 (1.3 GW), which together supply electricity to 2.5 million UK homes. Hornsea 3 alone will contribute up to £8.5 billion to the local, national, and global economy through supply-chain investment and the creation of thousands of high-skilled jobs during both construction and operation. The project is central to UK energy security and supports government climate and clean energy targets, underscoring its strategic importance.
UK vs US Renewable Energy Policy Landscape
The sale also highlights the stark contrast between UK and US renewable energy policies. The UK has consistently supported offshore wind through subsidies, stable permitting frameworks, and ambitious climate targets, making it an attractive market for developers and investors. In contrast, the US has faced regulatory uncertainty and political headwinds, slowing project development and deterring some investment. Yet recent developments, such as the lifting of a US court order on Ørsted’s Revolution Wind project in Rhode Island, suggest opportunities are emerging even in the US market, particularly as private investment firms like Apollo step in to fund large-scale offshore projects.
Selling a stake in the Hornsea 3 wind farm is widely seen as a strategically positive move for Ørsted. By partnering with Apollo, the company secures capital to accelerate construction, mitigate financial risk, and maintain its global leadership in offshore wind. This reflects a broader trend of renewable energy developers leveraging private investment to fund ambitious green projects, ensuring the continued expansion of clean energy capacity worldwide.
Ørsted’s Legacy in Offshore Wind
Ørsted’s history reinforces its pioneering role in offshore wind. The company built the world’s first offshore wind farm in Vindeby, Denmark, in 1991, generating 5 MW and powering 2,200 Danish homes. After more than three decades of innovation and scaling, Ørsted has developed more offshore wind farms than any other company outside China, now delivering some of the largest projects ever built.
Hornsea 3, with a 2.9 GW capacity, will make a significant contribution to UK energy security and climate goals. Managed from Ørsted’s operations and maintenance hub in Grimsby, it is the company’s third gigawatt-scale project in the Hornsea zone. The project joins Hornsea 1 and 2 and is part of an ongoing expansion that includes Hornsea 4, projected to reach up to 2.6 GW. Once operational, Hornsea 3 will provide millions of homes with renewable energy, sustain thousands of jobs, and strengthen the UK’s leadership in offshore wind.
Positive Outlook
Ørsted Hornsea 3 demonstrates the power of renewable energy finance partnership. Investors, policymakers, and industry stakeholders should watch this project closely, as it illustrates how adaptive financing, supportive policies, and global collaboration can drive the clean energy transition forward. The offshore wind project sale is not a setback—it is an opportunity to accelerate offshore wind development, strengthen energy security, and invest in a sustainable future.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
Why is Trump shutting down Biden-approved offshore wind projects—and what does it mean for US clean energy goals?
After shutting down two other large offshore wind projects, New York’s Empire 1Wind Project and Lava Ridge, it is moving to shut down Rhode Island’s Revolution Wind. Trump’s offshore wind ban policy will destroy Ørsted’s multi-billion dollar offshore project. Approved during the Biden administration, the projects were celebrated as the backbone of America’s clean energy transition. Now, with Trump’s shutdown looming, critics are warning that the United States is backing away from its climate commitments at the very moment the world is moving toward a low-carbon future.
The Trump administration argues the opposite: these projects represent expensive, unreliable, and risky ventures that harm national security and American taxpayers. But we all know that renewable energy comes entirely from nature. All of Trump’s decisions are raising one of the most divisive energy debates in modern American history.
Ørsted’s $1.5 billion project: 80% Complete, Now in Limbo
On Friday, August 22, 2025, the Trump administration issued a surprise order: all work on Orsted’s $1.5 billion Revolution Wind project must cease.
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) wrote to Orsted that the moratorium was necessary to protect “the national security interests of the United States” and “prevent interference with the reasonable use of the exclusive economic zone, high seas, and territorial waters.”
“You may not resume operations until BOEM notifies you that BOEM has completed its required review,” the agency clearly told Orsted.
The order halted a project that was 80% complete, already employs hundreds of union workers, and was scheduled to be completed by 2026. If it works, Revolution Wind will provide 704 megawatts of clean electricity—enough to power more than 350,000 USA homes across Rhode Island and Connecticut.
Table of Contents
A Decade of Progress
Ørsted has been operating in the US for a long time and is considered a leader in offshore wind. It has completed and is operating each project with great efficiency and success.
Revolution Wind is no speculative venture. It has spent nearly a decade undergoing environmental, technical, and regulatory reviews and then received every federal and state permit, including approval of the construction and operating plan in November 2023.
In essence, it has signed 20-year power purchase agreements (PPAs) to deliver 400 megawatts of electricity to Rhode Island and 304 megawatts to Connecticut, which the states plan to rely on as part of a strategy to reduce emissions and stabilize electricity prices.
Ørsted stressed that the project is fully permitted and contractually binding—an issue that could become the focus of an upcoming legal battle.
Ørsted’s investment in the US
Since the suspension, Oersted’s statements have been both defiant and defensive. The company has emphasized its role in building US energy infrastructure:
Investing billions in offshore wind, ports and grid upgrades
Building shipbuilding and manufacturing supply chains in more than 40 states
More than 4 million union workers are working hours on US offshore wind projects.
2 million hours at Revolution Wind alone.
After Trump’s ban, it said, “Revolution Wind is employing local union workers who support both onshore and offshore construction operations.”
The company is also assessing its financial situation, including legal action. Investors were warned that the suspension could affect its rights issue, due in August 2025, which could potentially put further financial pressure on Ørsted’s US operations.
Empire 1 wind project and Lava Ridge: Casualties
Revolution Wind is not one. The Rhode Island project is the third major renewable project to be shut down by the Trump administration this year:
Empire 1 Wind Project (New York): First, in April, Interior officials revoked approval for the offshore project off Long Island, which was scheduled to power millions of New York homes.
Lava Ridge Wind Project (Idaho): Second, in August, the administration revoked Biden’s approval for this land-based wind farm that would have powered 500,000 homes.
Revolution Wind (Rhode Island): Third, now on hold despite being near completion.
These projects, together representing more than 1.5 gigawatts of renewable capacity, represent significant progress toward Biden’s clean energy goals—progress that is now almost certain.
Empire 1 Wind Project:
The Empire 1 Wind Project, an offshore anchor in New York off the coast of Long Island, was designed to be one of the largest offshore wind farms in New York. With the potential to generate more than 816 megawatts of clean electricity, it is said to be capable of providing clean power to millions of homes, and the project has been a major contributor to America’s ambitious climate goals.
In terms of economic opportunity, various industry reports say that Empire 1 wind project, if fully operational, would create thousands of construction jobs, long-term maintenance positions, and billions in local investment. In many ways, it is the cornerstone of New York’s renewables strategy, and its success or failure could build investor confidence in the entire US offshore sector.
Empire 1, in essence, could make New York the epicenter of renewable energy in America. But with other mega-projects like Revolution Wind under Trump’s leadership, the administration has expressed doubts that Empire 1 will survive political interference.
For clean energy advocates, this makes Empire 1 a test case: The question is can state-level ambitions outpace federal rollbacks?
Lava Ridge Wind Project
Trump’s executive order initially halted Lava Ridge Wind Project. The Lava Ridge Wind Project, a proposed 1,000 megawatt (MW) wind farm in Magic Valley, Idaho, was designed to provide clean electricity to California. Initially approved by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in 2024, the project was abruptly halted in January 2025 by an executive order from former President Donald Trump.
Trump’s executive order halted Lava Ridge Wind Project Image: US Department of Energy
The project was located on 104,000 acres northeast of Twin Falls and planned for more than 200 turbines, each up to 660 feet tall.
Trump declared the project “unconscionable to the public interest and subject to legal error” in his order, which effectively terminated Magic Valley Energy’s right to proceed. And on his first day in office, Trump fulfilled a campaign promise by halting the project. In a press release, he citied:
“I promised the people of Idaho that I would not rest until the Lava Ridge Wind Project was shut down. On the first day, I kept that promise.”
South Fork Wind
South Fork Wind: A small project with a large symbol Compared to Empire 1—about 132 megawatts—Orsted project — its significance is enormous. As one of the first offshore wind projects approved in U.S. federal waters, South Fork was built to prove that offshore turbines are technically feasible and can be accepted by the public. Located near the South Fork of Long Island, the project is already generating enough electricity to power 70,000 homes.
Image: South Fork Wind website
It also suggests that offshore wind is not just about large industrial projects; smaller, regionally concentrated wind farms can play an important role in diversifying America’s energy mix. South Fork also has symbolic significance: If the Trump administration continues to target larger projects for cancellation, small but viable farms like South Fork could become the backbone of early offshore deployment in the United States.
Opportunity amidst controversy Despite the political turmoil, both Empire 1 and South Fork demonstrate that offshore wind is one of the biggest opportunities for US clean energy goals.
Together, they represent: Job creation: Thousands of direct and indirect jobs in construction, manufacturing, shipping, and long-term operations. Energy security: Reducing reliance on fossil fuel imports through reliable, domestic power generation.
Climate progress: A solid step toward New York’s mandate to generate 70% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. Global investment appeal: An opportunity to keep the United States competitive with Europe and Asia, where offshore wind is already growing rapidly. Still, the controversy is hard to ignore. Biden approved several projects early in his term, but Trump’s recent shutdowns have eroded investor confidence and shaken local economies.
Image; South Fork Wind website
New York officials argue that canceling or delaying projects like Empire 1 could jeopardize billions of dollars in clean energy promises, while fossil fuel allies argue that offshore wind is still too expensive and disruptive. The big question is, ultimately, that Empire 1 and the South Fork are the realization of the crossroads that America now faces.
Will political agendas derail projects that promise jobs, clean air, and long-term savings—or will these wind farms stand as proof that the United States is serious about leading the renewable energy revolution?
For now, both projects are alive and well, but the future of America’s offshore wind sector could depend on whether Empire 1 and the South Fork can weather the political turmoil and deliver on their clean energy promises.
Trump’s offshore wind ban: Energy dominance
The US has taken a stand against the shutdown as part of a broader strategy to protect energy interests.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has dismissed large offshore wind farms as “massive, unreliable, non-stop energy projects” that are holding America back. He argues that they put a heavy burden on taxpayers and threaten the US “energy dominance” that Trump has been borrowing from his first term.
Beyond the rhetoric, the Trump administration launched a national security investigation into wind turbine imports, focusing on potential foreign subsidies and supply chain vulnerabilities. It has invited public comment, but unfortunately, critics say the process is opaque and politically motivated.
Then, in the next blow, Congress recently passed theOne Big Beautiful Bill, which further strengthens the strict regime by removing clean energy incentives from Biden’s inflation reduction law. For renewable developers, this is a sign of an increasingly hostile investment environment.
The government has repeatedly implemented various laws and policies that have cornered wind energy, especially offshore wind projects, causing companies to suffer huge losses and forcing them to shut down projects.
Biden’s view versus Trump’s opposite
The stark divide between the two administrations is clear:
Biden’s plan: to approve projects like Empire 1, Revolution Wind, and South Fork to deliver 30 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030, bringing clean electricity to more than half of homes. These projects were designed not only to provide clean electricity but also to help the United States reduce emissions, compete with countries such as China and Europe, and create massive jobs in clean energy.
Trump’s opposite: Trump has repeatedly called for canceling, delaying, or severely reviewing these projects, citing national security risks, cost burdens, and energy insecurity. All of the arguments Trump made have since been proven wrong.
Biden saw offshore wind as a path to climate leadership; Trump sees it as a liability.
AI generated
State pushback and legal action
The response from states has been swift. In May, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined 17 other AGs in suing the Trump administration over its offshore wind regulation efforts.
With Rhode Island and Connecticut directly affected by Revolution Wind, further legal challenges are likely. Given its contractual obligations under the PPA and the billions of dollars already spent, Ørsted could end up in court, as could others.
The court could now decide whether the federal government can unilaterally halt projects that have been fully approved and are already under construction.
US Clean Energy Goals at Risk
If these project closures become permanent, the impact would be huge:
First, 1.5 GW+ of offshore wind capacity would be completely lost
Nearly a million homes would be without clean power
Billions in investments by developers like Oersted would be frozen
Thousands of union jobs would be lost
State climate goals in New York, Rhode Island, and Connecticut would be thwarted
Finally, Biden’s 30 GW by 2030 goal would be weakened
image: AI genertaed
The U.S. would lose credibility in the global race for renewable energy leadership, not just in terms of targets. While Europe and China are aggressively expanding offshore wind; the U.S. would lag behind.
Orsted’s future in the US
The crisis raises questions about whether Oersted and other developers will continue to invest in the US market. Ørsted has already built the South Fork Wind project, which is supplying power to New York at a 53% power factor—compared to baseload sources.
For the company, South Fork proves that offshore wind can be both reliable and efficient. But with Revolution Wind stalled and Empire 1 canceled, Ørsted faces increasing uncertainty. If political risks become too high, developers could redirect capital to friendlier markets in Europe or Asia.
A Nation at a Crossroads
The changing political landscape has brought about a major shift in US energy policy. The United States is currently at a crossroads. On the one hand, the country could accelerate its deployment of renewable energy, reduce its reliance on fossil fuels, and secure a place as a global leader in clean energy.
On the other hand, it could expand its fossil fuel dominance, questioning its leadership position with foreign competitors. The fight against Oersted’s Revolution Wind will be emblematic of this struggle. Will America commit to a clean energy future, or will politics derail decades of progress?
In the Bottom
In the last words, the Trump administration’s shutdown of Ørsted’s Revolution Wind would be more than a bureaucratic delay—it would be a symbolic and practical blow to US clean energy goals. Biden’s approval of projects like Empire 1 and Revolution Wind promised to transform the U.S. energy landscape, but Trump’s shutdown is shattering that vision, throwing states, companies, and workers into turmoil.
As the lawsuits pile up and political divisions deepen, the future of U.S. offshore wind—and with it, America’s clean energy goals—hangs in the balance. For Ørsted, the fight is about rescuing a $1.5 billion investment. For America, it’s about deciding whether to lead the global race to renewable energy or fall behind. The question is which way America will go!
With US clean energy goals under threat! it remains to be seen whether the U.S. will lead the global renewable energy race—or fall behind? Stay tuned to https://windnewstoday.com/ for the latest on offshore wind, clean energy policy.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
CaliforniaClean energy companies across the state are calling on Governor Gavin Newsom and state lawmakers to act swiftly in response to sweeping federal tax policy changes under President Donald Trump that risk billions of dollars in renewable energy investments and prompt challenges to California’s clean energy goals.
In a letter that went out earlier this week, five major clean energy trade groups, including the California Wind Energy Association and Solar Energy Industries Association, recently warned that Trump’s newly passed Republican-backed tax and spending law is creating significant roadblocks for continuing and forthcoming solar energy investments and wind energy projects in the Golden State. These organizations allege that California’s standing as a global leader on climate is at risk without state-level action.
Table of Contents
Federal Tax Credits for Renewables Risk Being Rolled Back
At the center of the anxiety is a provision in the new federal law that phases out important renewable energy tax credits, beginning after 2026, for projects that have not yet started construction. Projects that start after the deadline will need to be on-line by the end of 2027 to receive any remaining incentives.
Complicating the matter, Trump has ordered the U.S. Treasury Department to issue rules that would limit who can still qualify for these tax credits by which energy developers. This extra uncertainty makes it likely that dozens of utility-scale solar, wind and energy storage projects will now be delayed.
“These modifications introduce a new and grave risk of delay or outright cancellation for dozens of clean power projects,” the letter asserts. “We are pulling ahead and we are happy with the progress,” he said, “but without immediate reform at the state level, California’s clean energy investments — and the jobs that come with them — are at risk.”
California’s Clean Energy Goals
California has established some of the most ambitious climate and renewable energy targets in the world. The state recently said that more than two-thirds of its 2023 retail electricity sales qualified as coming from renewable and zero carbon-emitting sources, and all across onlookers struggle to cope with the speed at which it is leading the global energy transition.
Reversing federal support for California clean energy is in stark contrast to the state’s climate vision and clean energy policy agenda, including the mandate for 100% clean electricity by 2045. Many of those developers have already invested heavily in California’s energy infrastructure, from solar farms to wind energy projects to battery storage.
Trade Groups Urge California to Put It in a Higher Gear
In their letter, the five trade groups, which are the Large-scale Solar Association, California Energy Storage Alliance and American Clean Power Association (California chapter) called on the state to do four things:
Speed up approval for environmental permits and harmonies regulation for renewable energy schemes.
Expand clean energy purchasing, especially from utility-scale wind and solar developers.
Permit clean energy projects on farmland, which is underutilized for utility scale energy development.
Strengthen investment in grid infrastructure for managing higher levels of renewable energy tax credits and maintaining energy reliability.
If California can expedite these reforms, the groups say, the state can insulate itself from the consequences of federal rollbacks and maintain renewable energy momentum.
Wind Power in Texas Is Another Story entirely
While California is in limbo, in a tale of stark contrast, here’s what is happening in Texas wind energy projects policy. We have even seen Republican-majority states, such as Texas, achieve success developing the nations largest wind energy industry, not by government mandate but by offering market-based incentives and less onerous permitting processes that attract investment in renewable infrastructure.
Wind power’s growth in Texas is an example of how bipartisan support — or, at least, pragmatic policy — can help speed up the growth of clean energy. With federal support declining, California may soon have to turn to the Texas model of wind energy if the state wants to maintain its energy transition goals.
Jobs, Reliability and Clean Power Are at Stake
Not only does the rollback represent a major threat to renewable energy developers, but it threatens thousands of the clean energy jobs that exist. If projects get put on hold or canceled, the economic effect could reverberate across jobs in construction, operations, engineering and maintenance.
And the uncertainty threatens grid reliability, particularly as California confronts increasing power demands and the need to replace retiring fossil fuel plants with clean options. The rollback would imperil jobs, stability and progress toward California’s clean energy goals, according to the letter.
The state especially benefits from the clean energy sector. In 2023 alone, solar and wind projects led to the creation of thousands of high-wage jobs and investment in rural towns. This loss of momentum could have far-reaching consequences for both climate goals and long-term economic resilience.
California Clean Energy Developers Raise Alarms as Federal Support Fades
This is a pivotal moment in the energy transition in the United States. The Biden administration had sought to reduce the shift toward clean energy by broadening tax breaks in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) but the rollback by Trump would negate much of the push.
The decision to trump clean energy rollback the federal energy tax credit is viewed by many in the industry as a big step in the wrong direction. Developers worry the uncertainty of future regulatory environments could scare off investment, particularly in long-lead-time projects such as offshore wind or grid-scale storage.
Clean energy backers are imploring more Democratic states to draw up backup plans akin to what California wants to do in order to shield renewable energy development from swinging federal policy.
Conclusion: It Takes State Action to Protect Clean Energy Gains
As California goes forward, the decision is unmistakable: without urgent state action, the rollbacks in federal support for clean energy could stall crucial projects, shake investor confidence in the market and set back the state’s progress toward an energy future free from carbon.
The industry leaders’ letter sends a strong signal: Federal energy policy may be on its back foot, but states like California still have the tools in hand to protect and advance their visions of a clean power future — if they use them boldly.
The office of Gov. Newsom has not responded publicly. Yet the pressure to answer that question is getting louder, with billions of dollars in California clean energy investments on the line and California’s climate leadership in the balance.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
A New Roadblock: Personal Sign-Off Now Necessary to Approve Solar and Wind Projects on Federal Land
Trump Administration Halts Wind Projects on Federal Land! On a front the White House had hoped to leave untouched, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has been ordered to sign off personally on all solar and wind project approvals on federal lands, in a sweeping change that could upend plans to expand renewables development in the country, according to a confidential memo obtained by POLITICO.
The directive, transmitted Wednesday to staff at the Interior Department, applies a new level of vetting to clean energy projects and complexes on hundreds of millions of acres across this huge swath of federally managed land, including some of the most sun- and wind-rich patches in the country.
Table of Contents
Bottleneck to Approving Permits Along Large Areas of Renewable Land
The memo — written by Gregory Wischer, Interior’s deputy chief of staff for policy — stipulates that Burgum must sign off on “all decisions, actions, consultations, and other work” on wind and solar projects. That includes:
Scoping reports
Access road authorizations
Cost recovery agreements
Construction permits
Environmental review stages
Such cradle-to-grave review would also allow the consideration of the greenhouse gas pollution and public health implications of the projects, officials familiar with the memo said, and could place a significant regulatory burden on billions of dollars of previous projects moving through the pipeline.
A Strategic Move Against Wind and Solar Growth
The directive would seem to fit into a larger effort by the Trump administration to reduce support for renewable energy. One recent executive order, signed earlier this month, declared a national energy emergency and asked federal agencies to do everything they could to bolster dispatchable energy sources—even though it didn’t include wind and solar on the list of power sources in that category, or no new solar and wind project approvals.
The federal land energy policy order also directs the Interior Department to review its existing policies to determine whether they give “preferential treatment” to renewables over traditional forms of energy like coal, gas and oil.
Effect on Trump Administration Halts Wind Projects on Federal Land
Now, federal lands energy policy generate some 4% of the U.S.’s renewable power, or about 8.9 GW, according to a 2024 report by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The research as potential for:
5.75 TWp of utility-scale solar power
875,000,000 acres of potential land based wind energy
When environmental and social are in line, the realistic output will narrow down to:
1,750 GW for solar
70 GW for wind
That remaining development potential is put at risk by the new Interior directive.
Expert: “This Will Paralyze Renewable Energy Permitting.”
The former Federal Permitting Council executive director, Eric Beightel, who served under then-President Biden described the action as a “bureaucratic chokehold.”. Photo: linkedln
The former Federal Permitting Council executive director, Eric Beightel, who served under then-President Biden described the action as a “bureaucratic chokehold.”
“It will absolutely generate a huge amount of red tape that there is no way solar can move and wind can move at all fast or efficiency or even get over the line,” Beightel said to POLITICO.
“This is nakedly an effort to weaponize ‘the process.’
Interior Has Sharp Rebuke for Leaked Memo
In response to questions about the leaked memo, the Interior Department released a scathing statement:
“Let’s be clear: leaking internal documents to the media is cowardly, dishonest and violates professional standards,” a spokesman said.
“It’s a symptom of what is wrong in Washington today,” a spokesman for Mr. Cotton, James Arnold, said in a statement, adding, “It shows complete disregard for the hardworking people serving the American people.
Political Context: Bipartisan Support Turns to Administrative Clampdown
President Donald Trump, has frequently voiced opposition of certain renewable energy projects, advocation traditional sources.
But having signed the bipartisan 2020 Energy Act to encourage development of clean energy on federal lands, President Trump is now retreating with new policies that would hit America’s wind and solar sectors hard. His administration is working to rewrite what constitutes, it deems, a project’s construction start, which could cut off access to vital tax credits for renewable energy — and put great big wind and solar projects at risk. The newly enacted “Big Beautiful Act” comes wrapped in new layers of regulation empowering federal agencies to block or slow clean energy development. Critics say this turn of events is a bureaucratically engineered assault on renewables that is seeking to quietly choke clean energy with red tape. In a bitter irony — that one of the key components of the legacy of renewables support put in place by Trump is Trump himself, under pressure from House Republicans — the President aligned to derail the progress of the nation toward a renewable future.
The whole thing has confirmed for our readers what Trump’s recent wave of executive orders and legislation has already betrayed: a bedrock political philosophy born of an even deeper conviction that renewable energy can’t be trusted, a conviction consistent with his past complaints that wind turbines are unsightly and job-destroying. This, even though federal figures indicate that wind and solar now employ more Americans than coal mining and oil-and-gas extraction combined.
Should these policies persist, the U.S. even risks lagging behind global clean energy leaders, especially in wind-rich and solar-rich places such as the Southwest, Midwest and offshore East Coast.
What This Means for the U.S. Transition to Clean Energy
The action could hobble Biden-era ambitions to pull down utility-scale renewables across federal land even as the administration charts a path to 2035 clean energy goals.
The term “energy transition” alludes to the transition happening worldwide — that is, from dirty, polluting fossil fuels (namely coal, oil and gas) to clean, renewable sources, like wind, sunlight, water (in the form of hydro) and heat from the earth. It also comprises increasing energy efficiency, upgrading power grids and integrating electric vehicles, batteries and low-carbon technologies.
Trump administration halts solar and wind projects, implemented policies hat slowed the growth of wind and solar energy in the USA
And the transition to renewable energy and solar and wind project approvals isn’t simply an environmental necessity — it’s a strategic choice that will safeguard the nation’s economic and public health future. With fossil fuels still responsible for the majority of carbon emissions, the transition to clean energy — including wind and solar — is critical to addressing the threat of climate change and protecting the environment and the economy for future generations. Renewable energy also has national security benefits, by making the nation less dependent on imported oil and providing a more secure energy supply at home. Economically, the transition is an engine for job growth, with the clean energy sector expected to create millions of good-paying jobs across the country. And cutting air and water pollution gives a big boost to public health — to take just one consideration, we would have a lot less respiratory disease. As renewables become the cheapest source of power, families should get cheaper energy bills. By investing in clean energy now, we can keep the U.S. competitive in the global economy, drive innovation and secure an energy system we can rely on well into the future.
Trump energy policy emphasized fossil fuels
President Biden has articulated a strong goal that America be on a path to achieve 100 percent carbon pollution-free electricity by 2035 clean energy goals — a critical milestone on the way to net-zero emissions by 2050. This would involve spurring through more renewable energy like wind and solar, new plans for how to move electricity and invest in clean technologies. Under Biden’s plan, it’s crucial to use public lands as a place for staging large renewable projects — those that make meaningful contributions to our nation’s quest for energy independence and ability to lower utility bills, as well as stimulate job growth. The administration’s clean energy agenda is projected to create millions of union jobs, lower household energy bills and improve public health by slashing pollution. It will also be a long-term goal, aimed at not only addressing climate change but also seeing to it that clean, affordable energy is available to every American community: urban and rural, rich and poor. Now the Doug Burgum interior directive the renewable energy permitting delays and administration halts the solar and wind project approvals, altogether 2035 clean energy goals is far away to achieve.
The other danger is that if these policies stay in effect, the U.S. could very well fall grievously behind other global competitors in the market to scale green power production, given that we have more than 70 GW of land-based wind potential and more than 1,700 GW of solar powerdevelopment technically available.
Lastly
About the federal land energy policy — this a War on Wind and Solar by Process not Policy. While no official nationwide ban on renewable energy has been offered, the combination of Interior Department control, tax credit reinterpretation and the passage of the Big Beautiful Act does suggest an increasing move against clean energy — not necessarily by outright ban, but by bureaucratic strangulation.
Even as Trump’s staff undercuts fairness and regulatory integrity, renewable energy permitting delays, people in the industry and the clean energy advocacy community are seeing the writing on the wall: a concerted effort to slow America’s clean energy future.
The memo – federal land energy policy, leaked on Friday is a sharp about-face for the Interior Department’s approach to solar and wind development and left some renewable energy advocates worried about the future of clean energy development on federal lands. Even though the memo itself has not been released to the public, the implications of its contents, first federal land energy policy reported by POLITICO, are already being felt and the clean energy industry.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
One wind turbine can generate enough electricity to power nearly 1,000 homes. But because of the so-called “Big Beautiful Bill,” hundreds of those turbines might not rise — and America’s clean-energy momentum may fizzle.
Advertised as a patriotic remake of America’s energy policy, the proposal includes the passage of a Senate amendment that would slap punitive tariffs on the backbone the wind power industry in the US. While a proposed tax on wind and solar was dropped from the, the final bill still des the phase-out of clean energy tax credits, essentially swifter projects only have two years — until 2027 — to be up and running, or lose critical financial assistance.
That may seem like a small tweak. It isn’t. Wind projects, particularly large farms, take years of planning, permitting and investment. If the bill reduces the timeline, it is throwing sand in the gears of an industry that is creating jobs, cutting emissions and giving new life to rural communities across the country.
These aren’t theoretical losses. Up to 72 percent of planned clean energy installations are at risk of being delayed or canceled, analysts say. That means lost work for turbine technicians and manufacturers. Lost Income for Farmers Leasing Land. And higher energy costs for families that could have benefited from cheap, homegrown power.
Wind power is not a dreamer’s dream. It’s a tried and true engine of economic and environmental progress. Just ask Texas, the country’s wind leader, where conservative farmers and green advocates alike now re
Table of Contents
America Stands at a Crossroads on Energy
For years, the United States has sought to be a world leader in wind power, putting millions of homes within easy reach of high plains and coastal breezes that can carry the electricity generated by wind turbines. But a bill now being readied in Congress — named in the tradition of energy nationalism, or more specifically, the “Big Beautiful Bill” — is poised to bring that progress to a grinding halt, or worse.
Hailed by former President Donald Trump as a major victory for “traditional American energy,” the Big Beautiful Bill is coming under fire from renewable energy experts, economists, labor unions, and business leaders for doing too much harm to the wind and solar industries. Critics say that the bill would overturn decades of bipartisan policy to promote clean energy and leave thousands of renewable projects hanging in the wind.
With far-reaching implications for clean energy tax credits, wind turbine manufacturing, energy prices and climate policy, it is on track to become one of the most significant — and contentious — energy fights of recent American history.
What Is the “Big Beautiful Bill”?
That bill, the “Big Beautiful Bill,” is a sweeping energy and tax reform package backed by Donald Trump, the former president, and some conservative lawmakers. Billed as a pro-American, pro–energy independence proposal, the bill is larded with clauses that:
Advance the sunset on clean energy tax credits, including the popular Production Tax Credit (PTC) for wind.
Limit wind and solar development that relies on imported components, particularly those from China.
Ramp up fossil fuel development, promising to lease out more federal territory for oil and gas drilling on public lands.
Diminish financial aid for new renewable energy initiatives that begin after 2027.
For good, the bill does not contain a proposed tax on wind and solar projects that was part of the negotiations a few weeks ago, although it still cuts by a relatively significant amount the time frame for the development of wind and solar power, which critics point out is no small thing.
How Wind Energy Works —Why Policy Matters
Wind power has become one of the cheapest and most readily scaleable forms of energy generation in the US. Today, one wind turbine can produce enough power for close to 1,000 homes year-round, and entire regions — looking at you, Texas and Iowa — now get a large fraction of their electricity from wind.
But wind projects — particularly utility-scale wind farms — are multi-year affairs that require planning and permitting, financing and construction. That’s what makes politically stable, long-term support so essential. And it’s true that programs like the Production Tax Credit (PTC), whose origins date back to the 1990s, have played a role in helping to make wind energy cost-competitive with fossil fuels.
The PTC generally extends a per-kilowatt-hour tax credit to developers over a period of 10 years for electricity produced from new wind facilities. Without these credits, many projects are dead on arrival — particularly through early-stage investment.
What Big Beautiful Bill Impact On Wind
Under the Big Beautiful Bill, only wind and solar projects that were fully operational by the end of 2027 would continue to be eligible for these federal clean energy tax credits. This small window is a serious challenge to the clean energy pipeline, as most wind projects have a 3–5 year timeline from conception to completion.
What’s at Stake?
From several clean energy analytics firms:
As much as 28 gigawatts (GW) of wind and solar projects in the works may no longer qualify for tax credits.
At least 72% of them are at risk of being delayed or dropped because of financing difficulties and political unpredictability.
Over 1.7 million jobsin construction, operations and manufacturing could be lost.
Hundred billions of dollars of investment in clean energy industries could leave for countries with more predictable energy policy.
In practice, that could translate to fewer turbines in the ground, less clean energy on the grid and higher electricity bills for American consumers.
Wind Energy Jobs: A growing Sector Under Threat
Wind power has been among the fastest growing renewable energy job sectors in the United States. Wind turbine technicians have been in the top five fastest growing jobs for years now, and the industry has brought:
Construction teams and engineers working on wind farms.
Technicians maintaining the turbines.
Turbine blade, tower and nacelle factory workers.
Truck drivers and cranemen hauling equipment.
Landowners, especially those in rural America, who rent land for wind projects.
All of those economic dividends are endangered by Big Beautiful Bill. And the thousands of renewable energy jobs that might disappear if project development in states such as Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Iowa stalls. All this clean power brought suddenly home to a place many Americans have never seen.
Elon Musk, and Industry Leaders Slam the Legislation
Among the most outspoken opponents of the Big Beautiful Bill is Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who characterized it as “utterly insane and destructive legislation.”
“It’s just madness,” Musk took to X (formerly known as Twitter) to write. “This bill is an exercise in handouts to the industries of the past that punishes the industries of the future. It would obliterate the American worker.”
Musk’s denunciation echoes growing recrimination in the tech and clean energy sectors that the bill is more about short-term political gain than about the U.S. leading in energy over the long term.
In a statement released to the media, the American Clean Power Association (ACPA) decried the legislation as “a step backward for American energy policy” and said it would drive up electricity costs, kill jobs for Americans and set current climate goals in the country back.
States Most Affected
Republican lawmakers on both the left and the right have thrown their weight behind the bill, but its impacts may fall hardest on Republican-led states. Consider the following:
Texas is the wind energy capital of the country, with thousands of wind jobs.
Iowa and Oklahoma produce more than 40 percent of their electricity from wind.
With strong wind resources, Wyoming, Kansas and North Dakota are adding projects to their portfolio of wind projects.
South Dakota and Nebraska are growing wind powerhouses that are dependent on federal help.
In these rural states, wind power was not simply a partisan issue; it was one of revenue, job creation and pride. And the Big Beautiful Bill, for all its patriotic trappings, could undermine these local triumphs.
Energy Security and Climate Consequences
The bill comes at a time when global energy security is particularly salient, given the conflicts and supply shocks that have underlined the need for diversified, domestic energy sources.
Wind power provides:
Energy independence — It does not depend on unpredictable fossil-fuel markets.
Cheap power — The price of wind energy has declined more than 70% during the past decade.
Zero emissions —Wind is one of the most environmentally friendly sources of power on the planet.
The proposed “Big Beautiful Bill” comes at a time of extreme global energy policy peril — when energy security has never been more important, and the dangers of ceding ourselves to dependency on fossil fuels have never been more stark. Ongoing geopolitical tensions, disruptions to supply chains, and fluctuating prices of oil and gas have all made it clear that investing in a diversified set of domestically based energy resources, especially those that are invulnerable to foreign shock, is critically important. In that way, wind is one of America’s smartest energy sources and provides a trifecta: energy independence, low cost and no emissions. While fossil fuels are tied to wild global marketplace fluctuations and ripe for inflation, wind power is grown here in America, impervious to the foreign fix we face with oil. Wind energy costs have fallen more than 70% over the last 10 years, now making wind one of the cleanest and also cheapest electricity options on the market.
Across the Great Plains and along the coasts, wind turbines have become as familiar a part of the American landscape as fast food outlets and big box stores, silently turning in the breeze, and now they are powering millions of American homes, and stabilizing local energy grids, saving working families money along the way. Perhaps more important, wind is a driving force behind America’s climate action—emitting no greenhouse gases, no air pollution, and no hazardous waste.
Photo: nyt
Taking about Big Beautiful Bill impact on wind industry 2025, having policies that support wind power is more important than ever as the world continues to race toward carbon-free energy, and as world leaders from over 150 countries commit to climate goals and to protect future generations. But the Big Beautiful Bill risks reversing this progress, if it undoes hard-won clean energy tax credits and introduces policy uncertainty at exactly the wrong moment. Cutting support for wind projects not only delays the deployment of clean energy but also delivers a catastrophic signal to investors, developers and international partners — that the United States is not longer serious about being a global leader in clean energy. Just as Europe and China scale up investments in renewables and build secure energy supply, any retreat by the U.S. would be a step back from the front lines of climate and energy innovation.
This uncertainty is a huge financial risk for investors and less motivation to invest in long-term infrastructure. For domestic producers, it could portend canceled orders, closed plants and lost chances to take the lead in a fast-evolving sector. And for the world, it calls into question whether America can be trusted to honor its environmental commitments. With the climate crisis getting worse by the day — with record-breaking wildfires, hurricanes and droughts becoming annual events — the urgency to support proven technologies like wind energy has never been higher. Rather than retrenching, the U.S. should double down on renewables investments that enhance national security, create good-paying jobs and lower emissions.
Wind turbine-driven energy independence is not some fantastical vision of the future; it’s a real-time reality built through decades of bipartisan putting our money where our mouths are and private sector elbow grease. Sabotaging such progress with short-sighted legislation could have devastating implications, not only for the environment, but for America’s competitiveness in the global energy economy of the future. By pursuing the policies that enhance the stability and growth of renewables – like extending the Production clean energy Tax Credits, supporting grid modernization and providing investors confidence – the United States can help prevent wind being a key part of national resilience. Instead, enacting a bill that leads us backward and undermines the very foundation of our clean energy structure will only continue the cycle of dependence upon fossil fuels, raise consumer costs, and cede the United States away from its leadership position in this century’s global race to dominate climate and energy policy.
The decision facing lawmakers isn’t just one of subsidies versus tax schedules — it’s about whether the United States will be at the front of or at the back of the 21st-century clean energy race.
Farmers, Landowners and Local Economies Suffer
Not only will big developers lose — local communities will be the losers as well.
Farmers who rent land to wind developers receive steady, long-term income.
Rural counties earn tax revenue from wind projects.
Wind energy taxes provide direct funding to local schools, fire departments, and hospitals.
And if the Big Beautiful Bill stalls new wind energy industry in the US, these lifelines to rural America would dry up — while, ironically, hurting the same communities the bill purports to aid.
Clean Energy vs. Fossil Fuel: A False Dilemma?
The Big Beautiful Bill Fossil Fuelvs. Clean Energy incentives, supporters of the bill, they argue, need to return to their livestock, energy realism and “support American oil and gas.” But some critics say that is a false choice.
“We don’t have to choose between jobs at home and clean energy,” said a spokesman for the ACPA. “We can have both — and we must if we are to compete in the world.”
The U.S. can and should help all energy workers — but not by hollowing out the sectors creating jobs and energizing investment.
Policy Recommendations — What Needs to Change
Now that the Big Beautiful Bill is now making its way over to the House of Representatives, clean energy advocates are lobbying for key amendments, including that the:
The Pass the PTC Act would extend the production tax credit (PTC) for wind through at least 2032.
Save loan guarantees and investment tax credits for renewable energy developers.
Opposing export penalties targeted at the renewable component supply chain.
Preventing trade provisions that penalize American energy consumers.
Such policy changes would revive confidence among investors, stabilize the development pipeline and allow the wind industry to continue to play a part in the economy.
A Crossroads for the Future of U.S. Wind Power
The Big Beautiful Bill (as it’s called) may sound patriotic on paper — but it’s about the furthest thing from that the American wind industry can imagine.
With over 1.7 million jobs at stake, billions of dollars of investment in jeopardy, and long-term climate and energy security objectives at risk, this bill is a critical moment in the life of our country.
America faces a choice to lead the global clean energy transition, or lag in a world increasingly fueled by wind, sun and innovation.
As members of the House debate, one thing is certain: decisions they make in the coming weeks are likely to influence the U.S. energy landscape for decades to come.
The “Big Beautiful Bill” is a landmark for the wind energy industry in the US– one that has driven economic development, revitalized rural America, and provided clean energy to millions of Americans. Although couched in terms of a patriotic energy plan, the bill imposes a faster phase-out of the Big Beautiful Bill wind eenrgy tax credits expiration and restrictive policies that will block or delay the completion of hundreds of wind projects, including the loss of over 1.7 million American jobs in clean wind energy.
In the midst of a global momentum for clean power, America needs to carefully consider the long-term implications of this law. Keeping the wind at our backs is not only an environmental imperative — it is an economic imperative, and a major component of America’s energy security.
As the legislation travels through Congress, lawmakers will decide through a series of forks in the road whether the U.S. remains at the forefront of renewable energy innovation or lags behind in the clean energy race across the world. The fate of millions of workers, communities and the climate demands it.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is the Big Beautiful Bill Impact On wind energy?
The Big Beautiful Bill is a proposed legislative package supported by former President Donald Trump that hastens the sunset of clean energy tax credits, which also extend to wind power. Only wind projects that are in service by the end of 2027 would be eligible for the Production Tax Credit (PTC), essentially setting back or even killing dozens of projects and threatening U.S. strides in renewable energy.
When would the wind energy tax credit expire under the Big Beautiful Bill?
Under the bill, wind energy tax credits would end in 2027. Any project that wasn’t up and running by Dec. 31, 2027, would lose eligibility for the federal Production Tax Credit, making it more difficult to secure financing and finish large wind farms on schedule.
How much clean-energy capacity is at risk from the new legislation?
As many as 28 gigawatts of planned wind or solar capacity could be put at risk, according to energy analysts, under the Big Beautiful Bill. Those projects may lose the critical tax credits and federal loan backing that helped launch them, halting the growth of clean energy in the United States.
What will the bill mean for renewable energy jobs?
The American Clean Power Association and labor unions project that if the wind tax credits lapse, over 1.7 million construction and manufacturing jobs could be lost. These losses would hit rural communities particularly hard, and states that have sunk billions of dollars in wind infrastructure, such as Texas, Iowa and Oklahoma.
What does the bill do for U.S. energy independence and climate goals?
The bill would damage U.S. energy independence by slashing incentives for domestic, clean sources of energy such as wind. It also puts the brakes on progress toward zero-emissions energy goals, sending a signal to global investors and allies that the United States might be pulling back at a time when other nations are accelerating investments in clean energy.
Can Congress overrule or alter the Big Beautiful Bill’s features?
Yes. The measure still needs to pass the House as well, and there’s a chance lawmakers could revive long-term tax credits for clean energy, extend eligibility timelines or add new givebacks to shore up renewable energy. Industry advocates are calling on Congress to act before long-lasting damage is inflicted on the wind energy business.
Why are permanent tax credits so critical for a wind project?
The process of planning, permitting, and constructing a wind energy project typically requires 3 to 5 years. Long-term, predictable tax credits such as the PTC provide developers and investors with the certainty to finance these multidecade projects. Abrupt changes in policy upset the entire development pipeline and sometimes lead to delays or cancellations.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
Meta wind energy deal Texas — secured a 198 MW — expanding AI data center operations. It is part of a larger renewable energy purchase of Meta four 791 MW projects with Invenergy, one of the largest clean energy developers in the United States.
This latestMeta renewable energy dealin Texas is another milestone in the company’s clean power strategy and reflects Meta’s strategy to balance wind and solar power across multiple U.S. states, including a mix of power purchase agreements (PPAs) and environmental attributes purchase agreements (EAPAs) with onshore wind development, which will meet its data center sustainability goals.
As demand for AI infrastructure grows, Meta AI energy strategy is looking to large-scale onshore wind and solar projects nationwide, to secure reliable, low-carbon energy sources, reduce reliance on fossil fuels, and strengthen environmental credentials.
791 MW Clean Energy Push: A Nationwide Strategy for AI Growth
The 198 MW wind power deal in Texas is just one of a total of 791 megawatts (MW) of renewable energy purchases that Meta has tied up with Invenergy, one of the largest clean energy developers in the United States. The renewable energy projects will provide clean electricity to support Meta AI-powered data center network and nationwide.
Project Name
State
Type
Capacity
Year
Yellow Wood Solar Energy Center
Ohio
Solar
300 MW
2027
Pleasant Prairie Solar Center
Ohio
Solar
140 MW
2027
Decoy Solar Energy Center
Arizona
Solar
155 MW
2027
Seaway Wind Energy Center
Texas
Wind
198 MW
2028
Meta four 791 MW projects
This large-scale initiative reflects Meta AI energy strategy to balance onshore wind and solar power across multiple U.S. states, helping to reduce reliance on fossil fuels as well as supporting AI workloads that demand consistent, high-volume power.
The collaboration between energy and tech, Meta four 791 MW projects advanced investment in utility-scale renewable energy highlights how big tech companies are becoming major drivers of wind and solar development in the United States.
Table of Contents
Why Meta Needs Wind Power
With the rise of generative AI and large-scale compute clusters, Meta’s data center footprint is growing — and so is its energy needs. Powering a sustainable AI infrastructure has become a top priority for the company. The 198MW wind power project – officially named the ‘Seaway Wind Energy Center’ – will provide 198 megawatts of wind power in a state already known for its wind leadership and is expected to be operational by 2028.
“Winning the AI race requires reliable, clean, affordable energy,” said Ted Romaine, EVP of Origination at Invenergy. “We are grateful for our continued relationship with Meta.”
The Meta Invenergy wind deal is just one part of a larger effort to decarbonize operations while maintaining uptime and performance at critical facilities. This isn’t Meta’s first rodeo in Texas wind. Earlier this year, the company signed several Environmental Performance Purchase Agreements (EAPAs) and solar contracts across the Lone Star State. Along with expanding AI, Meta renewable energy deal as its looking to wind energy solutions and other zero-emission sources to secure its digital infrastructure for the future.
It’s not just Meta that is reflecting the broader trend of advanced energy with the tech industry, with companies like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft racing to integrate clean energy into hyperscale data center operations. Just as technology is a reflection of renewable energy, green energy is also a reflection of energy. Larger companies are integrating the two, believing clean energy for AI.
Meta Wind Energy Deal Texas
Meta largest data center in Northeastern Louisiana,1700 football fields in size, Image: CNBC
Meta’s 198 MW wind project in Texas is a significant investment, and it’s unclear whether the company secured the power through a traditional power purchase agreement (PPA) or a new environmental attributes purchase agreement (EAPA).
A PPA involves a commitment to purchase both electricity and associated renewable energy credits (RECs) from a clean energy project.
An EAPA, on the other hand, involves purchasing only environmental attributes – such as RECs – without taking a physical delivery of electricity.
Meta has increasingly supported EAPAs in recent years because of their flexibility. However, critics argue that EAPAs have a low direct climate impact, as they do not always result in the creation of new renewable energy.
Despite the controversy, Meta has used EAPAs to secure more than 1.5 gigawatts (GW) of clean energy capacity in the past year, helping it move toward its net zero and 100% renewable energy goals.
America’s Energy Transformation with Invenergy
300 MW Santa Rita East Wind Farm, Invenergy Project in Texas
Chicago-based Invenergy is the developer of the Seaway Wind Energy Center and other clean energy projects in the metro area. With a strong international presence across the US, UK and Asia, Invenergy has arguably one of the most diverse clean power portfolios worldwide. Here’s a quick look at what they’ve done in the US:
17.6 GW of wind power
6 GW of solar power
5.9 GW of natural gas (as a transitional fuel) and
Invenergy has worked with Meta AI-powered data center as other technology and telecom giants including Verizon, which recently signed four virtual PPAs for 640 MW of renewable energy across Maryland, Illinois, Ohio and Arizona. So, Invenergy’s partnership with Meta with total 791 MW will put it at the forefront of a growing alignment between big techand clean energy developers working together to shape the future of the U.S. power grid.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
PARIS, France — In a dramatic reversal, the French National Assembly Energy votesagainst a controversial amendment that would have imposed a moratorium on wind and solar power projects nationwide. And It’s breaking that France blocks Right-Wing Plan to Ban Green Energy. The decision is a major victory for France’s renewable energy sector, coming just days after industry leaders warned that the proposal could have cut up to 80,000 jobs and threatened more than 5 billion euros in clean energy investment.
Last week, the world watched as France declared a “war on green energy,” with conservative and far-right parties pushing for legislation that would have suspended all new renewable development until 2035. The vote took place yesterday and today, MPs rejected the amendment, a renewed confidence in France’s commitment to a clean energy future.
Breaking: France Green Energy Ban Proposal Rejected
The world, from developed to developing, is undoubtedly driven by growing clean energy ambitions. But it is suddenly surprising—almost paradoxical—that France, a historically climate-friendly country, is considering turning its back on renewable energy. This has surprised the world and angered its own people. French lawmakers have imposed a ban on wind and solar projects, while the UK Crown Estate recently revealed plans to invest up to £400 million in its offshore wind infrastructure—a bold move that only strengthens Britain’s green energy leadership.
Or how the French right has been emboldened to reflect the growing offshore wind ambitions in the US, as it faces obstacles! Notably, in a recent twist in the United States, President Donald Trump—a vocal critic of offshore wind Farm Projects—has shown surprising disapproval of American offshore wind expansion, citing strategic advantages. But just as Americans are vocal about renewable energy, so too is France, which has been forced to reject France Green Energy Ban under some pressure. A sad example would be France debating frozen progress while others rush toward a wind-powered future.
Jerome Nouri
The amendment, introduced by Republican MP Jerome Nouri, was approved in a first reading by a narrow section of parliament last week. It proposes to suspend all procedures for approving new large-scale solar and wind power projects – a move that clean energy advocates have been describing as “economic sabotage” and “climate neglect”.
Nouri claimed that the introduction of renewable energies has doubled electricity prices, harmed rural life and put financial pressure on the state. He called for an independent study to determine France’s “optimal energy mix” before allowing any new development.
But the backlash was swift and intense.
“The proposed law would have wiped out decades of progress, destroyed up to 80,000 clean energy jobs and thrown France’s climate targets into disarray,” said Jules Nyssen, president of the French Renewable Energy Trade Association (SER).
Table of Contents
France Green Energy Ban Draft Bill
In the first reading in the National Assembly, lawmakers passed a series of amendments to France’s national energy and climate policy bill. Among the most controversial are: a wind and solar moratorium of France on the permitting and commissioning of new wind and solar installations until an “independent study” is conducted to determine France’s “optimal energy mix.”
The amendment, introduced by Republican MP Jerome Nouri, would not affect projects already approved. But it would immediately halt future development for up to a decade — freezing the pipeline at a crucial moment when global momentum is building around offshore and onshore wind, solar PV and hybrid clean energy systems.
“The rollback of renewable energy has driven up electricity prices, disrupted rural communities and imposed an unreasonable burden on taxpayers,” Nouri claimed, citing a 100% increase in electricity costs and “environmental degradation” as justification for the moratorium.
The amendments passed include:
A step away from the biofuel target
An exclusive focus on nuclear power as the backbone of France’s future energy mix
Giving local governments the power to reject their regional renewable energy projects.
Key Takeaway:
🗳️ France National Assembly Energy Voted for France Green Energy Ban against the France wind and solar moratorium
💼 80,000 clean energy jobs threatened in wind, solar, manufacturing and supply sectors
💰 €5 billion collapse in Engie’s planned projects in solar farms, wind installations and grid interconnections
🏭 160,000 renewable energy jobs lost nationwide
🔌 France’s climate targets unlikely to be met in 3-5 years
📉 Risk of rating downgrade due to loss of investor confidence
Government response: “Irrational and irresponsible”
Jules Nyssen, president SER
Environmental Change Minister Agnès Panier-Runacher has strongly opposed the right-wing policy against solar and wind, calling it “irrational” and calling on lawmakers to show “responsibility” in shaping the country’s energy future.
She reminded parliamentarians that France had already imposed a similar moratorium in 2010, which nearly collapsed the solar feed-in tariff scheme and cost 20,000 jobs in the country’s photovoltaic sector.
“We cannot repeat the mistakes of the past,” she warned. “France’s energy future depends on a diversified and ambitious strategy – not on isolationism and procrastination.”
Jobs, investment and climate targets back on track
France National Assembly Energy vote brought relief to major renewable developers, including Ng, who warned that the moratorium could put €5 billion in wind and solar investment at risk. Energy analysts also noted that the amendment also threatens France’s net-zero targets for 2030 and 2050 and EU climate obligations.
Brussels-based industry group WindEurope applauded the decision.
“France has made the right decision,” said WindEurope spokesman Christophe Ziff, adding that “in times of geopolitical instability, Europe needs to grow its domestic renewables – not behind them.”
A narrow escape for a green transition
The proposed ban was part of a broader effort by far-right and nationalist parties to refocus France’s energy strategy solely on nuclear power. Their platform called for:
Abolish biofuel development targets
Give local authorities more power to reject renewable projects
Prioritize nuclear power as the only “reliable” energy source
The rejection of the amendment by a majority of lawmakers in today’s vote shows that despite political polarization, a strong pro-renewable energy coalition remains intact in parliament.
What Next?
However, experts on the suspension say the close call is a wake-up call for France’s renewable energy sector. France Green Energy Ban highlights the fragility of the political consensus on climate action – even in countries committed to ambitious decarbonization timelines.
“The fight is not over yet,” Nyssen said. “We must remain vigilant and renewables are not just a matter of technology or economics – it is a matter of France’s credibility, resilience and global leadership.”
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
Virginia Beach, VA — The Atlantic Ocean is never still, but what is happening 27 miles off Virginia Beach is a new kind of motion — one that is reshaping America’s energy future. The Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) project is currently the largest offshore wind farm in the United States, and it’s not just building turbines; it’s building a national narrative.
At a time when the U.S. is trying to prove it can meet ambitious clean energy targets, CVOW is a real-world test. It is a bold demonstration that the U.S. can construct large-scale offshore wind infrastructure without relying solely on European expertise.
Table of Contents
A Wind Farm That’s Bigger Than Electricity
Dominion Energy, one of the leading developers in wind energy in the USA, is building a project that will cover 112,800 acres of federal waters and include 176 Siemens Gamesa turbines. Each turbine will rise nearly 800 feet above sea level, with rotor blades longer than a football field.
When completed in late 2026, CVOW will generate 2.6 GW of clean energy — enough to power 660,000 homes across Virginia.
Opinion: The size alone makes this project a national benchmark. If it succeeds, it will prove that offshore wind can become a mainstream energy source in the U.S. The project is a statement: America is no longer a follower in offshore wind — it is a contender.
For readers who want to explore more offshore wind projects in the U.S., check out our Offshore Wind category, which covers the latest updates on major projects and policy changes.
From Pilot Phase to Commercial Reality
The project started modestly in 2020, when Dominion Energy and Ørsted installed two 6-megawatt pilot turbines — the first offshore wind turbines in U.S. federal waters. These early installations proved that the site was viable and that the technology could withstand the Atlantic environment.
Now, the project has moved into commercial scale. Foundations are being installed on the ocean floor, turbine parts are arriving through the Port of Virginia, and the region is becoming a major offshore wind logistics hub.
Opinion: This transition from pilot to commercial scale is the real proof of concept. If CVOW delivers on time and on budget, it will create a roadmap for future projects.
CVOW isn’t only a clean energy project — it’s an economic engine.
The project is expected to create thousands of jobs across construction, operations, logistics, and manufacturing. More than 1,100 full-time jobs will be created once the project is operational.
In addition, new facilities such as blade finishing plants and staging hubs at the Portsmouth Marine Terminal have already emerged, revitalizing previously underused industrial zones.
One of the most significant developments is the construction of the Jones Act-compliant installation vessel “Charybdis”, built specifically for CVOW. This vessel will help reduce reliance on foreign ships and strengthen the U.S. offshore wind supply chain.
Opinion: CVOW is not just building a wind farm — it is building a domestic offshore wind industry. That’s a bigger impact than the electricity it produces.
The company’s first Jones Act-compliant offshore wind turbine installation vessel, the “Charybdis,” is being constructed for CVOW. Manufactured in the U.S., it will also allow the country to cut its dependence on foreign ships, taking the country one strategic step closer to energy independence at home.
The project has undergone extensive review by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM). Stakeholders, including tribal nations and marine conservation groups, participated in the review process.
To protect marine wildlife, CVOW includes strict mitigation measures:
Acoustic monitoring for whales
Low-noise pile driving
Seasonal construction limits
Environmental groups still demand transparency and long-term monitoring, and their concerns are valid. Offshore wind can be clean energy, but it must be built responsibly.
CVOW is more than a state-level project; it is a national milestone. The Biden administration’s goal of 30 GW of offshore wind capacity by 2030 relies on successful projects like CVOW.
Other major offshore wind projects in the U.S. are closely watching CVOW, including the Empire Wind project and New Jersey’s Ocean Wind. They will use CVOW’s outcomes as a benchmark for costs, logistics, permitting, and environmental compliance.
Opinion: CVOW is the first true test of whether the U.S. can build offshore wind at scale. If it fails, the entire industry may slow down. If it succeeds, the U.S. will become a global leader.
Technical Challenges and Risks
Building offshore wind at this scale is not easy. The project faces several risks:
Supply chain delays
Cost overruns
Weather delays
Grid interconnection challenges
The U.S. has not built many projects of this size before, so every delay becomes a lesson.
Opinion: The U.S. offshore wind industry is still learning. CVOW is a live training ground. The biggest question is not whether the project will be completed, but whether it will be completed efficiently enough to lower costs for future projects.
Future Outlook for U.S. Offshore Wind
If CVOW is successful, it will open the door for broader offshore wind expansion along the Atlantic seaboard. As grid upgrades and energy storage improve, offshore wind will become more reliable and cost-effective.
This project also sets a precedent for:
Permitting and regulatory standards
Grid integration
Vessel logistics
Environmental monitoring
Long-term, CVOW could reduce millions of tons of CO₂ annually, supporting the U.S. role in global climate action.
Final Word
As the turbine towers rise above the waves and power moves ashore, CVOW is shaping what’s achievable in American clean energy. It’s a tribute to what vision, capital, and engineering can accomplish when aligned with the urgency of climate change.
The wind is shifting — and the future of power may be found offshore.
FAQ Section
Q1: What is the CVOW offshore wind project? A: CVOW is the largest offshore wind farm in the US, located off Virginia Beach with 176 turbines and 2.6 GW capacity.
Q2: When will CVOW be completed? A: The project is expected to be completed by late 2026.
Q3: How many homes will CVOW power? A: CVOW will power over 660,000 homes
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
The offshore wind sector has been stagnant with federal leasing halted, tax credits eliminated and developers pulling out of core markets
President Donald Trump energy policy changes are putting America’s offshore wind industry in jeopardy, with more than 22 projects on hold and an estimated $114 billion in clean energy investments at risk.
The Biden administration has been making some dramatic strides in its push toward renewable energy, particularly wind power. Several offshore wind project policy decisions involving billions of dollars in investment, projects, and infrastructure were made before he took office. But Trump’s reversal of that Biden-era clean energy aid — along with an executive order suspending offshore wind leasing and permitting — has brought development along the East Coast to a near standstill. Energy experts warn that the stalling could hurt states’ climate goals and derail America’s renewable energy ambitions for the next decade, potentially costing billions of dollars.
Table of Contents
Trump Energy Policy Halts Offshore Progress
On his first day in office, President Trump signed an executive order halting new and renewal approvals for offshore wind projects pending a full federal review. The order effectively withdraws federal waters from offshore wind leasing and suspends agency operations across multiple departments, including the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM).
While the review remains incomplete, the White House has declined to provide details or a timeline for a resolution.
“The result I fear is unexplained delays,” said Jonathan Elkind, a senior research scholar at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy. “There’s no transparency here.”
Permits revoked, projects canceled
Since the order, numerous wind projects have had their air permits revoked, environmental assessments delayed, and construction halted. As a result of regulatory uncertainty, a major offshore project in New Jersey has pulled out of its state power contract after the EPA’s decision to revoke its permit. France-based renewable energy developer EDF has formally withdrawn from its $5 billion Atlantic Shores offshore wind project in New Jersey, which was set to generate up to 1,500 megawatts of power, decarbonize the U.S. power grid, and provide clean electricity to more than 700,000 homes.
Industry data shows that 22 wind farms spanning states from Massachusetts to North Carolina are either on hold in the planning stages or have been pulled out of the pipeline entirely. In the New York Bay, once a centerpiece of Biden’s offshore wind campaign, at least two projects have been formally canceled.
The delays would affect about 22 gigawatts of planned capacity — enough to power millions of homes.
$114B Offshore Wind investments at risk
Natalie Gunnell, Shell’s renewable energy division imge: linkedln
According to an April analysis by BloombergNEF, the Trump’s energy policy changes have forced developers to pull out of projects that have yet to reach a final investment decision (FID). Without assurances of federal support, companies are delaying supplier contracts, canceling financing rounds and exiting joint ventures.
Shell and Equinor, the two largest investors in the sector, have already pulled out of key offshore developments in New Jersey. Shell has confirmed that it will not be building any new offshore wind projects in the United States.
“The commercial situation is no longer viable,” said Natalie Gunnell, a spokeswoman for Shell’s renewable energy division.
The Republican Party has moved to repeal the Clean Energy Tax Incentive.
The industry slowdown comes amid efforts in Congress to repeal key provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, including the Clean Energy Investment Tax Credit. Clean energy projects would have to begin construction within 60 days to qualify for the home-grown energy package, and would be phased out entirely by 2028.
The current Senate version drops the 60-day provision while maintaining the phase-out provision. Industry advocates argue that the proposed changes add another layer of uncertainty, further cooling investment.
“It’s creating an environment where financing and procurement deals are not moving forward,” said Harrison Schoeller, an offshore wind analyst at BloombergNEF.
Supply chain expansion stalls nationwide
Beyond the coast, the impact is being felt across the U.S. wind supply chain. For example, Siemens Gamesa’s plan to open a Virginia blade manufacturing facility in 2023 was canceled due to insufficient demand. Vestas’ proposed nacelle assembly plant in New Jersey has been quietly shelved.
As domestic suppliers retreat, future U.S. wind projects could become more reliant on imports—with developers facing potential tariffs on European components proposed by the Trump administration.
As a result, analysts estimate that production costs could increase by up to 25% over current policy conditions.
Climate Goals at risk
The United States is now expected to generate just 6.1 gigawatts of offshore wind power by 2030, 20% of the Biden administration’s original 30-gigawatt goal. Eleven states with offshore wind targets are unlikely to meet them, according to a project-by-project review by BloombergNEF.
“There’s been a chilling effect across the industry,” said Katharine Collins, president of the Southeastern Wind Coalition. “We’re seeing projects being scrapped and approvals being delayed nationwide.”
The impact extends beyond power generation. Thousands of green jobs, from technicians to engineers, are at risk in shipbuilding, steelmaking and port construction. State officials have begun revising energy roadmaps as the federal government restricts wind development.
South Fork Wind Farm
One example of Biden’s success in offshore wind projects is the name of South Fork Wind Farm. It is New York’s first commercial offshore wind farm and is considered a milestone toward meeting the United States’ 2030 renewable energy goals.
The 150-megawatt offshore wind farm is a groundbreaking project in the search for sustainable energy solutions. It is the first offshore wind project in the United States to connect to the national grid in 2024. It is one of the achievements of the Biden-Harris administration, symbolizing the 2030 wind policy.
Jointly owned by Danish multinational Orsted and US energy supplier Eversource, the wind farm has a capacity of 130 megawatts and can generate clean energy for more than 70,000 homes. It is a major step towards achieving New York’s goal of generating 70% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. Located about 35 miles off the coast of Montauk, the wind farm is expected to eliminate up to six million tons of carbon emissions over its lifetime, the equivalent of taking 60,000 cars off the road for the next 20 years.
South Fork Wind is providing more than 1,200 direct construction jobs and thousands more indirect and induced jobs. Hundreds of New Yorkers, engineers, electricians and conservationists are operating the South Fork Wind project. It aims to create thousands of long-term and temporary environmentally friendly jobs, support training programs, fund scientific research and provide opportunities for underserved communities.
Some Hope, But Not Clear
Despite the stalemate, a handful of offshore wind farms are under construction, including Empire Wind in New York, and are expected to be completed by 2027, adding about 5.7 gigawatts of power to the East Coast grid. But experts warn that these projects represent legacy investments from previous administrations, not signs of future progress.
“There are still opportunities here,” said Hilary Bright of the national offshore wind advocacy group Turn Forward. “But without policy coordination, those opportunities won’t materialize.”
The Bottom line
The future of offshore wind in the U.S. under the Trump’s energy policy with administration’s current energy strategy is highly uncertain. With billions in clean energy investments on hold and dozens of projects stuck in regulatory deadlock, the path to a low-carbon energy grid is narrowing. The U.S. is moving away from green policies, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and efforts to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Absent major federal policy changes or legislative compromises, America’s offshore wind projects ambitions will likely remain on hold for the next decade.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
Crown Estate Offshore Wind Investment Plan Explained
In a significant move to super-charge the UK’s offshore wind industry, The Crown Estate has announced plans to invest up to £400 million in a new round of leasing for offshore wind sites. This was an ambitious declaration made at the ‘2025 Global Offshore Wind conference’ summit in London when — dubbed the powering wind energy plan — aims to unlock the next phase of wind energy growth in the UK by the supporting vital onshore.
Table of Contents
UK offshore Wind Investment Set for Major Expansion
Under the “Powering Offshore Wind”, The Crown Land’s new capital investment plan comes on the back of a strategy to offer long-term seabed leases for new offshore wind projects, aiming to develop a world leading offshore wind market in the UK.
The plan centers on:
Port and harbor upgrades
centers of wind-turbine component manufacturing
Research and testing installations
Partners International Agency Collaboration with national energy agencies
This is vital in order to meet the UK’s renewables targets, and also a catalyst for creating jobs, spurring investment, and driving economic
Head Of the Investment, Crown Estate
Supply chain capacity has been one of the biggest hurdles to fast offshore wind growth in the UK. Ben Brinded, head of investment of The Crown Land, said that it was an investment to target the gaps.
“Without working together and investing in the UK supply chain, we will not achieve the full economic, social and environmental potential of offshore wind,” Brinded said, during the announcement.
And by de-risking future offshore wind developments, improving logistics, and cutting costs for developers, the £400 million funding is predicted to deliver long-term wins in terms of both clean energy generation and the domestic economy.
How the powering offshore wind plan support by supply chain growth
It’s not going to occur in a vacuum, this investment. Organizations including Great British Energy, the National Wealth Fund, and key private sector players will all be supported by The Crown Land to help deliver maximum impact.
Chair of the Offshore Wind Growth Partnership
“As the Offshore Wind Industry works towards delivering the aspirations of the Industrial Growth Plan, industry and the other public investors working in alignment and collaboration is the best way to achieve this,” added Tim Pick, Chair of the Offshore Wind Growth Partnership.
That aligns with efforts to speed up projects, support technology leadership in the UK and increase local content in offshore wind work, cementing Britain’s status as a global wind leader.
How the powering offshore wind plan supports by supply chain
While The Crown Land manages seabed leasing for England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the investment affects various other regions across the UK, such as Scotland and Ireland. Many infrastructure improvements will do good for regional economies while enhancing the national grid.
So whether it’s off the coast of the north-east of (England, Scotland and Wales) building out extra port capacity, in Wales manufacturing and in Northern Ireland testing facilities, this package is about making sure all parts of the UK can access the advantages of clean energy.
This is not your casual investment of the day. The Crown Land is focusing medium-term infrastructure development for resilient systems that can deliver:
Floating wind farms
Larger turbine deployments
Faster project permitting
Engineering and construction green jobs
They are also in line with theUK’s goal to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.
Why £400 million in Renewable Energy funding matters now
The UK is already a world leader in offshore wind capacity, but expansion has stagnated because of infrastructure constraints and the pressures of rising costs. As a strategic ambitious investment inducement, it unlocks stalled schemes, as well as drawing in overseas money and encouraging innovation in next-generation wind.
For developers, investors and for communities, the news is being portrayed in the media as a turning point – one that could shape the UK’s energy landscape for generations to come.
The Crown Land’s £400 million pledge to unlock the full potential of offshore wind is more than an investment – it is a statement of ambition that the UK will be the global leader in clean energy.
As new ports are developed, manufacturing scales up, and innovation progresses, this scheme could turbocharge the offshore wind industry, support thousands of green jobs and help transition the UK towards a sustainable, net zero future.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
President’s executive order Sparks uncertainty over offshore wind
EDF France-based Renewables developer has officially withdrawn from its Atlantic Shores offshore wind project in New Jersey, due to regulatory uncertainty created by the administration and policies of former President Donald Trump. The $5 billion clean energy project faces a significant setback today after the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revoked a key permit, halting construction plans just months after federal approval under President Biden.
Trump EPA Sinks $5B Wind Farm
Table of Contents
Trump order and EDF withdrawal cited as key reasons
Former President signed an executive order on his first day back in office that directed the Interior Department to suspend future leases for offshore wind projects and reevaluate the permitting process. While the order did not directly affect projects already approved, it did result in the Environmental Protection Agency revoking the environmental permit granted to Atlantic Shores in October 2024. In a follow-up,
EDF Renewables filed a request with New Jersey regulators on Tuesday to terminate the power supply agreement associated with the Atlantic Shores 1 wind project. The move effectively puts the project on indefinite hold and is said to be one of the most high-profile withdrawals in the U.S. offshore wind sector.
Renewable’s filing directly blames President’s decision to revoke the original permit by the Environmental Protection Agency and broader executive actions taken by the White House targeting offshore wind development.
“The President’s wind memorandum, the subsequent loss of permits and other actions taken by the current administration have forced the applicant’s parent company to materially reduce its workforce, terminate contracts and cancel planned project investments,” the company said.
EDF cited in its filing that these actions have created “an uncontrollable level of uncertainty,” making further investment in the NJ project financially and operationally risky.
Impact on New Jersey’s Clean Energy Goals
The Atlantic Shores Wind Farm, a major Biden-era effort that was slated to generate up to 1,500 megawatts of electricity, decarbonize the U.S. power grid and provide clean electricity to more than 700,000 homes, is now a part of the now-defunct Great loss for Renewable Future initiative. It was one of 11 offshore wind projects approved between 2021 and 2024 under the previous administration.
“This filing marks the end of a chapter, but not the end for Atlantic Shore,” Atlantic Shore CEO Joris Veldoven said in a public statement. “Offshore wind continues to provide NJ with a strong value proposition that includes thousands of well-paying jobs, stable electricity prices and real economic benefits.”
However, Veldoven noted that the company is “re-evaluating” its long-term plans in the U.S. due to changing federal policy. Opponents of offshore wind development, on the other hand — including lawmakers, fishermen and environmental groups concerned about marine life — are celebrating the announcement.
“This is a huge win for South Jersey,” said longtime critic Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.). “We have been fighting to protect our coastline, our economy and our communities from reckless offshore wind development.”
Bonnie Brady, president of the Long Island Commercial Fishing Association, added:
“Every time a wind company pulls out of a project in the United States, it’s a great day for all of us who make our living from the ocean.”
Offshore Wind Struggle Continues
This is the second major wind project in NJ to be canceled in less than two years. Earlier in 2023, Denmark’s Orsted abandoned its Ocean Wind projects due to economic pressures from inflation and global supply chain problems.
With the France-based renewable new joining the Renewal exit list, questions are being raised about the future viability of offshore wind power in the United States—especially under an administration that favors fossil fuels over renewables.
Conclusion: The Future of Energy Shifts in the Political Policies
As the political winds shift, clean energy developers are facing a new era of uncertainty in the United States. The renewable energy company, who plays a leading role, developed 23 GW over 300 projects, has withdrawal from the Atlantic Shores project could signal a broader industry withdrawal in response to federal opposition—which could have a high-impact impact on the country’s ability to meet climate goals.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
The UK stands a crucial watershed moment in the energy transition journey. With the decline of oil and gas jobs, an alternative opens up: the offshore wind investment and green jobs boom. While fossil fuel employment continues to shrink, renewables energy are emerging as the underpinning of energy security and economic recovery.
A new report on the offshore energy workforce from Robert Gordon University identifies an important trend: while UK offshore energy total employment was stable between 2023 and 2024, the internal churn is changing quite dramatically. It is a sector changing from one based on oil and gas, to one powered increasingly by clean energy, renewable energy such as offshore wind power.
Table of Contents
UK Offshore Wind Jobs Fuels Employment Growth
They also found that UK offshore jobs was relatively stable, sitting at about 154,000 workers each year between 2023 and 2024. But buried within that number is the elephant in the room: a massive shift. A drop of about 5,000 jobs to 115,000 workers dented the oil and jobs workforce in the traditional sector, which fell from 120,000 positions. It continues a trend of decreasing employment across fossil fuels on the back of declining production and growing decarbonization pressure on both products and firms.
By comparison, jobs in the offshore renewables industry in the UK grew sharply — up from some 34,000 to just under 39,000 within a single year. This expansion is linked directly to increased development of offshore wind energy, particularly for early-stage activities like pre-construction work and new wind farm construction phases.
This rebalancing of the workforce internally is driving an identity change of the sector. Of the offshore wind workforce, oil and gas accounted for 80% in 2023, compared to only 20% for renewables. And by 2024 that balance had changed to around 75 per cent oil and gas and 25 per cent renewables, a clear indicator of the shift in green energy jobs UK.
Green Jobs Will Exceed Fossil Fuel Jobs This Late 2020s
Professor Paul de Leeuw, RGU
Forecasts looking forward indicate that green energy jobs UK—the vast majority offshore wind jobs—will boom in the coming years and outstrip oil and gas employment. The number of offshore renewables workers in the UK is expected to rise from 31,000 in 2022 to between 84,000 and 153,000 by 2035, depending on investment levels and policy commitments.
Conversely, the UK oil and gas workforce is projected to keep declining, falling to 57,000–71,000 people by the early 2030s. This transition is not just a structural realignment in energy, but also a significant opportunity for retraining and workforce development. By acting in a coordinated fashion, we can train thousands of oil and gas workers to migrate into offshore wind and other cleaner and more sustainable roles.
Transport shifts in the UK are entering a crucial time – referred to as a “Goldilocks zone” between 2025 and2050 in the report – where appropriate investments now and plans in place can help to capitalize on the fact that workforce skills will remain highly transferrable and levels of employment can remain stable as the sector pivots.
Skills, Training, Infrastructure Needed
To maintain the existing size of the offshore workforce and that of a growing green energy economy in the UK, the proceedings report makes a number of pivotal recommendations. It must deliver a minimum of 40GW of operational offshore wind by 2030. Achieving this bold target will underpin thousands of opportunity for jobs — from wind farm construction, to operations and maintenance, to supply chain services.
“Offshore wind farm in the UK – 75,000 green jobs at risk”
Increasing the UK content — is the proportion of offshore wind capital investment that remains within the UK economy — is another important element. Currently, we deliver about 25% of the capital activities for renewables in country. This could unlock significant employment upside if UK capex content is increased up to 40%. More domestic capital expenditure in offshore wind projects translates into more jobs between 7,000 and 12,500 in fact for every 10% of capex by 2030.
Achieving this target will involve large scale transition of UK operational capacity, and operational capability — at least in manufacturing, engineering, logistics and vocational training. To ensure projects proceed and jobs are created when planned, much of this new infrastructure will have to be built before final investment decisions are made.
Finding the Way Through the Just Transition with a Workforce Plan
Supply and demand of the workforce: this is where it becomes important as the UK works its way to a just transition towards a net-zero economy. While representing less than 1 percent of global greenhouse gases, the UK is providing a template for how developed countries can transition away from fossil fuels without sacrificing jobs and communities.
Declining offshore workforce in UK wind energy sector
This means a new kind of offshore employment ever — flexible and project-based. Labor will likely transition between major renewable projects and also between regions and companies. The emerging jobs market will demand a much greater emphasis on vocational skillsets, which will in-turn require new pathways and re-skilling in areas such as offshore wind and decommissioning.
Still, before 2027, there simply might not be enough room in renewables to accommodate all the oil and gas workers being fracked out by sector decline. It emphasizes the need for early investment and targeted policy intervention to scale up renewables quicker and gear up for bigger movements of the labor force in the late 2020s.
Offshore Wind as a Foundation for the Future Green UK Economy — UKERC
UK offshore wind investment: how to make the most of it Everyone with a stake in this must know that making more clean energy at lower cost is not just about clean energy. It is about creating an adaptive and affordable economy built on better pay, our own energy independence, and a resurgence in climate leadership. Offshore wind can help raise up regional economies, establish new manufacturing centers, and build a diverse and inclusive green workforce, if the correct policies are adopted.
“Offshore wind turbines Technicians – 2030 job loss warning”
In fact, with as much as 85% of current O&M work for renewables already performed by UK companies, the skills base is already here. The question now is whether this can be emulated in capital development activities, where domestic participation remains under international levels.
BothMcCarthyand his think tank saw a clear opportunity for the UK to lead the world in offshore renewable. But time is of the essence. Haqq-Misra said that postponements in action, or the lack of cooperation between government, industry and education, would lead to the loss of job and lost opportunity. But without concerted action, the offshore energy workforce could shrink from 154,000 to only 125,000 by 2030 — increasing the challenge of reaching net zero.
Conclusion: Bet on the Future of a Green Economy
This shift away from fossil fuels and toward renewables is underway. It is now up to the UK to decide if it will drive this or simply flail, trying to keep up. So, with oil and gas jobs diminishing, the offshore wind sector growing, and decarbonization around the world accelerated, we must seize the opportunity to invest in green jobs and domestic renewable infrastructure today.
By:
by investing in skills-based learning,
And investing in UK-based supply chains,
Adding to the UK capex basket, and
On delivering large scale offshore wind projects,
…Britain can do to safeguard its energy future, protect good jobs, and become a clean energy superpower.
The UK offshore energy sector is on the verge of a new industrial revolution. By capitalizing on new opportunities, the country can increase its energy security and strengthen its position as a world leader in offshore energy.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
June 2025 — Edinburgh, Scotland launches national offshore wind consultancy supported by both the Scottish Government and industry leaders — a mainstay of revolution. The new initiative will combine marine science, AI-driven analytics and engineering to offer expert advice on wind development.
It is a world-leading sea-based energy innovator, with significant North Sea wind energy potential and a long-standing renewables success story.
So, what do you get when a country of only 5.5 million people dares to take on the titans of the power sector? Which is just what Scotland has just gone and done.
The UK country is positioning itself to be the great power player in the renewable game, and their new offshore development consultancy is no just another government program: it’s even got it’s own special protection for the iconic seas and coastlines.
Table of Contents
Scotland Seeks to Strategically Boost Offshore Wind
Anyone watching offshore wind development in 2025—and beyond—will know this decision to control their own renewable fate over the dictates of remote corporations. Using decades of North Sea experience and hard-earned lessons, they are constructing what stares new-found riches in the eye.
But here’s what is truly fascinating; the consultancy will provide guidance to projects throughout Europe, the U.S., and Asia, including site optimization, environmental impact assessments, and smart-grid integration.
The effort — backed by the Scottish Government and offshore renewable energy leaders — is aimed at helping countries establish high-efficiency wind farms in a bid to develop key international capabilities and build up the supply chain. By virtue of deep knowledge of the North Sea and marine engineering experience, It is turning its geography into an export asset, becoming a hub of wind energy consulting around the world.
🔹 Consulting Highlights
Use the latest data and scientific evidence to inform decisions on energy developments – such as how projects will impact wildlife and nature
Ensure the environmental, social, economic opportunities and constraints from offshore projects are clearly set out to help inform decision making
Ensure the interests and views of other marine users, including fishers, coastal and island communities and environmental groups are taken into account
The consultancy isn’t trying to top down implement solutions. Instead, they’re partnering with fishing communities, island populations, and traditional maritime industries to devise community-driven methods.
This isn’t just good politics, it’s also good business. New Haven Strategy of better involving stakeholders early on is helping avoid the conflicts that have dogged the development of offshore projects elsewhere. The consultancy acts as an interface between where tech innovation and the communities that will eventually live with these great works.
And this method is already paying dividends. Festering lawsuits and protests on one side, and partnerships between fishing cooperatives and wind developers on the other. Attitudes are changing, and the idea that the sea should be widely shared for the benefit of all continues to gain ground.
The Global Knowledge Export
This EU country is not hoarding its lessons learnt Scotland positioned as “global knowledge center” for the world’s offshore energy industries – where others learn, train and plan strategies, according to the consultancy.
Even now, they have delegations visiting from Japan, Chile and South Africa. They’re not merely on the hunt for more spinning turbines—they’re there to see what makes its model distinctive, to learn how to integrate it all.
In turn, this export of knowledge produces a virtuous cycle. Every international partnership introduces fresh perspectives and challenges which itself continuously hones the Scottish method. The consultancy grows stronger with every exchange, solidifying the country as the global center of excellence in wind power.
Gillian Martin – Secretary, Acting Net Zero and Energy Highlighted,
Gillian Martin, Image: Linkedln
There is huge potential for our country to deliver thousands of well-paid, green jobs through growing Country’s wind sector while speeding up our path to net zero.”
The new Sectoral Marine Plan for Offshore Wind Energy contains scope areas for wind development in Scottish waters, along with associated constraints. It underpins the sustainable development of marine activities to ensure a balance between the needs of communities, nature and other sea users, bringing clarity, certainty and confidence to both investors and other marine users.
The Scottish Government will meanwhile continue to engage closely with the fishing industry, island and coastal communities and other sectors throughout the consultation. “It is vital that everyone with an interest has their say,”
MIKE SPAIN – Director of Marine, Crown Estate Scotland cites,
MIKE SPAIN, LinkedIn
We welcome the release of the draft updated Sectoral Marine Plan and urge everyone with a stake in Scotland’s offshore development sector to contribute to this consultation.
“We are pleased to have completed two successful wind leasing rounds and, with the help of the sector, we are doing everything we can to ensure that these projects can realize maximum value for the country.
Benefits to the Community and Justice
Their consultancy is about more than just megawatts and money. They are questioning the very basics of who profits from offshore development, and how to share those profits in an even manner.
They’ve built community benefit types where local communities experience the upstream benefits of nearby projects. These can include lower electricity prices and shares of community ownership stakes in the projects themselves.
This approach takes into account that development is not done in a vacuum. Sustainable support from the public, on which the long-term success of our sector depends, can only be maintained if each citizen feels the benefits in their everyday lives.
The consultancy is pushing back on the traditional lowest-common-denominator measure of community engagement that developers have used. This has resulted in a new wave of projects that local communities are embracing, rather than fighting.
Conclusion
Lastly, in countries like the United States, where large-scale this wind development is expanding on both coasts, country’s four proposed approaches will serve as a blueprint for balancing innovation and ecosystem conservation.
The SMP-OWE draft aims to avoid conflicts between industrial development and marine conservation – providing a transparent, science-driven way to build trust between developers, communities and environmental groups so they can work on investment, technology and innovation at the same time.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
Queensland’s $1 billion Moonlight Range Wind Farm project has sensationally been abandoned in the wake of fierce local resistance and ministerial intervention. The decision, made by Deputy Premier Jarrod Bleijie on May 22, has been met with heated debate across political, environmental and industry discussion, and sets the tone for the treatment of renewable energy projects in Queensland for the future.
Backlash From the Community Causes it to Shut Down
The proposed Moonlight Range Wind Farm─a Greenleaf Renewables’ flagship renewable energy project—which was to produce up to 450 megawatts of electricity to power over 260,000 homes annually. It was set to comprise 88 wind turbines and a battery energy storage facility over 24 land lots near Morinish, 40 km west Rockhampton. The project said it would create 300 jobs during construction and 10 permanent jobs once operational.
But after getting the green light from the State Assessment and Referral Agency in December 2024, the project took a brutal turn when Mr. Bleijie “called in” the development for re-evaluation in January. More than 500 public submissions were posted during a two-month consultation period, 142 of them by local residents, and 88% opposed the wind farm.
Table of Contents
Issues mentioned: Housing, Environment and Risk of Fire
The main sticking points were the pressure it would place on the local accommodation market with 300 construction workers in town, a lack of consultation with the community, potential environmental damage and an increased risk of bushfires. Those concerns were critical.
Renewable energy projects should require community support in the same way as for other industries such as mining and agriculture,” Mr. Bleijie said. “If a community wants these projects to happen, they’re going to happen. But 88 per cent of locals did not want the Moonlight Range Wind Farm to continue on.”
88 per cent of locals did not want the Moonlight Range Wind Farm to continue on. —
A Change of Policy — or a Retreat?
The cancellation highlights what Bleijie referred to as a “new approach” to energy development that requires renewable projects to meet the same high hurdles as other industries. This change has been greeted with concern by renewables supporters who are concerned that it may undermine investment and slow progress towards Australia’s clean energy aspirations.
But for local residents and some landholders, it’s a win for local voices. John Ellrott, whose cattle ranch comes up to the Moonlight Range, said he felt relieved. “The Moonlight Range has some very significant flora and fauna that needs protecting. We don’t need every range blanketed in wind towers.”
LNP Member for Mirani Glen Kelly said the announcement was “great news” and a win for Rockhampton region communities. “The communities have to have some say on these projects… Happy days for the people who’ve been working hard to block this.”
“The communities have to have some say on these projects… Happy days for the people who’ve been working hard to block this.” —
No Appeals Allowed
The minister’s determination determines the Moonlight Range Wind Farm’s future and cannot be appealed under the Planning Act.
Moonlight Range Wind Farm
The Moonlight Range Wind Farm was set to be a major milestone in Queensland’s transition to a cleaner, greener energy system. With the Queensland Energy and Jobs Plan in its corner, the state has set targets of 70% renewable energy by 2032 and 80% by 2035 which are essential if we are to slash emissions and ensure that Queensland’s future energy is sustainable.
“There has already been more than $11 billion invested in renewables in Queensland since 2015 with 54 large-scale projects which support almost 8,700 construction jobs. The state is also a leader in rooftop solar, installed on more than 10,000MW, which helped push renewable energy to 27% of the grid.
Australia is on a national push to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 43% of 2005 levels by 2030 and to reach net zero by 2050, with a focus on providing a clean electricity supply.
So What Now for Renewable Queensland?
The cancellation has fueled a larger discussion: Should local opposition be able to thwart large-scale renewable energy projects critical to fighting climate change? Or is consent of the community an important brake in an age of fast-paced energy transformation?
As Queensland contemplates where it goes from here, the Moonlight Range saga is a salutary reminder that green energy is not just about wind turbines and megawatts — it is also about people, place and policy.
But Australia’s energy policy aims to transform to a clean, secure and affordable energy system, with the aim of increasing renewable energy sources and reducing emissions. In light of this, the 2025 Australian election was a traditional battle for green energy sources against dirty energy. The Moonlight Range Wind Farm is more than the loss of a wind farm, it is a sign of the times and a sign of climate policies and community engagement that remain disconnected. In Australia’s net-zero push, every renewable project counts.
And now is when we need to be keeping informed, speaking up and standing up for smart, sustainable energy solutions. If you’re a policy maker, investor or simply want to make the world a better place, your voice has influence to drive the future of Australia’s energy.
Join us as we continue to cover the progress on renewable energy projects in the US.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.
Equinor CEO Anders Oppedal thanked President Trump, Governor Kathy Hochul and U.S. political leaders.
Empire Wind 1 is the first offshore wind project to directly supply electricity to New York City
The project will benefit supply chains and jobs in New York, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Texas and South Carolina
Equinor’s Empire Offshore Firm is part of a U.S. investment totaling $60 billion
The project will provide clean energy to 500,000 homes
Table of Contents
Offshore Wind Project Resumes Under Trump Order
South Brooklyn Marine Terminal (SBMT) complex in Brooklyn, New York Offshore Wind Project site, Source: Equinor
In a surprising and significant move, the Trump administration has lifted the moratorium on Empire Wind 1 — a $5 billion offshore wind project led by Empire Offshore Wind LLC, a subsidiary of Equinor ASA. The green light marks a turning point in U.S. energy development, and is a rare moment of bipartisan alignment to advance clean energy infrastructure.
Norway-based Equinor will be able to resume construction after more than five weeks of costly delays. The move comes after months of intense opposition from industry leaders, state officials and clean energy advocates who warned that the moratorium would threaten more than 1,500 union jobs, billions in investments and America’s clean energy future.
Equinor Empire Wind ‘Back on Track’
Initially suspended by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum in April 2025 over concerns about the approval process, the project has now been reinstated after intense negotiations with 17 state and federal officials, along with more than 10 prominent environmentalists. Following a lawsuit against the Trump Executive Order, the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has officially lifted the offshore wind moratorium, allowing construction to resume on New York’s first offshore wind farm that will directly power the city of New York.
Oppedal, CEO, Equinor
Equinor CEO Anders Oppedal expressed gratitude for the decision, crediting President Trump, Governor Kathy Hochul and other local leaders for reviving the project and their collaborative efforts. “Construction can now resume on Empire Wind, a project that highlights our commitment to supporting the local economy while also providing energy and creating jobs,” said Oppedal.
” Construction can now resume on Empire Wind, a project that highlights our commitment to supporting the local economy while also providing energy and creating jobs” —
Empire Wind 1 is a key component of New York’s renewable energy future. With 54 turbines planned – each up to 910 feet tall – the project is designed to generate 810 megawatts of clean electricity, enough to power 500,000 homes. More than 30% of the project is already complete, with $2.5 billion invested to date.
Molly Morris, President of Equinor Wind US, noted the project’s broad economic benefits: “Empire Wind brings investment to supply chains in states across the country, including New York, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Texas and South Carolina.
” Empire Wind brings investment to supply chains in states across the country, including New York, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Texas and South Carolina.” —
Trump Officials Planned Compromise
President Donald Trump has been a vocal critic of wind power since his inauguration — calling the turbines bird killers and an economic burden — and his decision to lift the moratorium on Empire Wind signals a planned shift that comes alongside an apparent backchannel deal to renegotiate pipeline capacity for natural gas. Yet his decision signals a broader energy compromise.
Burgum, in a social media statement, hinted at natural gas development as a condition: “Americans living in New York and New England will see significant economic benefits and lower utility costs from increased access to clean American natural gas.”
“Americans living in New York and New England will see significant economic benefits and lower utility costs from increased access to clean American natural gas.” —
Energy Dominance is the foundation of America’s economic and national security. I am encouraged by Governor Hochul’s comments about her willingness to move forward on critical pipeline capacity. Americans who live in New York and New England would see significant economic…
— Secretary Doug Burgum (@SecretaryBurgum) May 20, 2025
However, Governor Hochul reiterated his commitment to clean energy without directly mentioning any fossil fuel exemptions. “New York will work with the administration and private companies on new energy projects that meet legal requirements,” he said.
“New York will work with the administration and private companies on new energy projects that meet legal requirements,” —
Empire Wind Construction Status
Wind turbine staging operations with the Manhattan skyline in the background. Equinor
Empire Wind’s resurgence comes amid a growing momentum for offshore wind projects on the U.S. East Coast. Other major developments, including Revolution Wind, Sunrise Wind and Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind, are also moving forward, with Revolution Wind about 75% complete.
Despite numerous political headwinds, obstacles and regulatory uncertainty, offshore wind has secured its place in America’s energy mix. Equinor aims to complete Empire Wind 1 by 2027. Despite fierce opposition from the U.S. government, Empire Wind has come back online in the face of a grassroots movement, and the winds of change are once again blowing in favor of clean, renewable energy.
Conclusion: New York Wind Project Transition
The latest halt to the Empire Wind project marks a pivotal moment for U.S. Green energy development, where political coordination and economic coordination are intertwined. Because
Despite the opposition, a complex but potentially promising shift in the energy narrative under the Trump administration is creating a mix of economic benefits, job creation, and infrastructure growth. With construction now underway, the project not only reinforces Equinor’s commitment to clean energy but also demonstrates the growing national momentum behind offshore wind.
Ismot Jerin is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of WindNewsToday, an independent publication covering offshore wind, renewable energy policy, and clean power markets with an analytical focus on the United States and global energy transition.