How Trump Energy Policy is Killing 22 Offshore Wind Projects, $114B Investment

How Trump energy policy is Killing 22 Offshore Wind projects, $114B Investment

The offshore wind sector has been stagnant with federal leasing halted, tax credits eliminated and developers pulling out of core markets

President Donald Trump energy policy changes are putting America’s offshore wind industry in jeopardy, with more than 22 projects on hold and an estimated $114 billion in clean energy investments at risk.

The Biden administration has been making some dramatic strides in its push toward renewable energy, particularly wind power. Several offshore wind project policy decisions involving billions of dollars in investment, projects, and infrastructure were made before he took office. But Trump’s reversal of that Biden-era clean energy aid — along with an executive order suspending offshore wind leasing and permitting — has brought development along the East Coast to a near standstill. Energy experts warn that the stalling could hurt states’ climate goals and derail America’s renewable energy ambitions for the next decade, potentially costing billions of dollars.

Trump Energy Policy Halts Offshore Progress

On his first day in office, President Trump signed an executive order halting new and renewal approvals for offshore wind projects pending a full federal review. The order effectively withdraws federal waters from offshore wind leasing and suspends agency operations across multiple departments, including the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM).

Jonathan Elkind a senior research scholar at Columbia Universitys Center on Global Energy Policy Picsart AiImageEnhancer

While the review remains incomplete, the White House has declined to provide details or a timeline for a resolution.

“The result I fear is unexplained delays,” said Jonathan Elkind, a senior research scholar at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy. “There’s no transparency here.”

Permits revoked, projects canceled

Since the order, numerous wind projects have had their air permits revoked, environmental assessments delayed, and construction halted. As a result of regulatory uncertainty, a major offshore project in New Jersey has pulled out of its state power contract after the EPA’s decision to revoke its permit. France-based renewable energy developer EDF has formally withdrawn from its $5 billion Atlantic Shores offshore wind project in New Jersey, which was set to generate up to 1,500 megawatts of power, decarbonize the U.S. power grid, and provide clean electricity to more than 700,000 homes.

Industry data shows that 22 wind farms spanning states from Massachusetts to North Carolina are either on hold in the planning stages or have been pulled out of the pipeline entirely. In the New York Bay, once a centerpiece of Biden’s offshore wind campaign, at least two projects have been formally canceled.

The delays would affect about 22 gigawatts of planned capacity — enough to power millions of homes.

$114B Offshore Wind investments at risk

Natalie Gunnell a spokeswoman for Shells renewable energy division Picsart AiImageEnhancer
Natalie Gunnell, Shell’s renewable energy division imge: linkedln

According to an April analysis by BloombergNEF, the Trump’s energy policy changes have forced developers to pull out of projects that have yet to reach a final investment decision (FID). Without assurances of federal support, companies are delaying supplier contracts, canceling financing rounds and exiting joint ventures.

Shell and Equinor, the two largest investors in the sector, have already pulled out of key offshore developments in New Jersey. Shell has confirmed that it will not be building any new offshore wind projects in the United States.

“The commercial situation is no longer viable,” said Natalie Gunnell, a spokeswoman for Shell’s renewable energy division.

The Republican Party has moved to repeal the Clean Energy Tax Incentive.

The industry slowdown comes amid efforts in Congress to repeal key provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, including the Clean Energy Investment Tax Credit. Clean energy projects would have to begin construction within 60 days to qualify for the home-grown energy package, and would be phased out entirely by 2028.

The current Senate version drops the 60-day provision while maintaining the phase-out provision. Industry advocates argue that the proposed changes add another layer of uncertainty, further cooling investment.

“It’s creating an environment where financing and procurement deals are not moving forward,” said Harrison Schoeller, an offshore wind analyst at BloombergNEF.

Supply chain expansion stalls nationwide

Beyond the coast, the impact is being felt across the U.S. wind supply chain. For example, Siemens Gamesa’s plan to open a Virginia blade manufacturing facility in 2023 was canceled due to insufficient demand. Vestas’ proposed nacelle assembly plant in New Jersey has been quietly shelved.

As domestic suppliers retreat, future U.S. wind projects could become more reliant on imports—with developers facing potential tariffs on European components proposed by the Trump administration.

As a result, analysts estimate that production costs could increase by up to 25% over current policy conditions.

Climate Goals at risk

The United States is now expected to generate just 6.1 gigawatts of offshore wind power by 2030, 20% of the Biden administration’s original 30-gigawatt goal. Eleven states with offshore wind targets are unlikely to meet them, according to a project-by-project review by BloombergNEF.

“There’s been a chilling effect across the industry,” said Katharine Collins, president of the Southeastern Wind Coalition. “We’re seeing projects being scrapped and approvals being delayed nationwide.”

The impact extends beyond power generation. Thousands of green jobs, from technicians to engineers, are at risk in shipbuilding, steelmaking and port construction. State officials have begun revising energy roadmaps as the federal government restricts wind development.

South Fork Wind Farm

One example of Biden’s success in offshore wind projects is the name of South Fork Wind Farm. It is New York’s first commercial offshore wind farm and is considered a milestone toward meeting the United States’ 2030 renewable energy goals.

The 150-megawatt offshore wind farm is a groundbreaking project in the search for sustainable energy solutions. It is the first offshore wind project in the United States to connect to the national grid in 2024. It is one of the achievements of the Biden-Harris administration, symbolizing the 2030 wind policy.

Jointly owned by Danish multinational Orsted and US energy supplier Eversource, the wind farm has a capacity of 130 megawatts and can generate clean energy for more than 70,000 homes. It is a major step towards achieving New York’s goal of generating 70% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. Located about 35 miles off the coast of Montauk, the wind farm is expected to eliminate up to six million tons of carbon emissions over its lifetime, the equivalent of taking 60,000 cars off the road for the next 20 years.

South Fork Wind is providing more than 1,200 direct construction jobs and thousands more indirect and induced jobs. Hundreds of New Yorkers, engineers, electricians and conservationists are operating the South Fork Wind project. It aims to create thousands of long-term and temporary environmentally friendly jobs, support training programs, fund scientific research and provide opportunities for underserved communities.

Some Hope, But Not Clear

Despite the stalemate, a handful of offshore wind farms are under construction, including Empire Wind in New York, and are expected to be completed by 2027, adding about 5.7 gigawatts of power to the East Coast grid. But experts warn that these projects represent legacy investments from previous administrations, not signs of future progress.

“There are still opportunities here,” said Hilary Bright of the national offshore wind advocacy group Turn Forward. “But without policy coordination, those opportunities won’t materialize.”

The Bottom line

The future of offshore wind in the U.S. under the Trump’s energy policy with administration’s current energy strategy is highly uncertain. With billions in clean energy investments on hold and dozens of projects stuck in regulatory deadlock, the path to a low-carbon energy grid is narrowing. The U.S. is moving away from green policies, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and efforts to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Absent major federal policy changes or legislative compromises, America’s offshore wind projects ambitions will likely remain on hold for the next decade.

Trump’s EPA Kills $5B Wind Farm – EDF pulls out New Jersey project

Trump's EPA Kills $5B Wind Farm - EDF pulls out New Jersey project

President’s executive order Sparks uncertainty over offshore wind

EDF France-based Renewables developer has officially withdrawn from its Atlantic Shores offshore wind project in New Jersey, due to regulatory uncertainty created by the administration and policies of former President Donald Trump. The $5 billion clean energy project faces a significant setback today after the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revoked a key permit, halting construction plans just months after federal approval under President Biden.

Trump EPA Sinks $5B Wind Farm

Trump order and EDF withdrawal cited as key reasons

Former President signed an executive order on his first day back in office that directed the Interior Department to suspend future leases for offshore wind projects and reevaluate the permitting process. While the order did not directly affect projects already approved, it did result in the Environmental Protection Agency revoking the environmental permit granted to Atlantic Shores in October 2024. In a follow-up,

EDF Renewables filed a request with New Jersey regulators on Tuesday to terminate the power supply agreement associated with the Atlantic Shores 1 wind project. The move effectively puts the project on indefinite hold and is said to be one of the most high-profile withdrawals in the U.S. offshore wind sector.

Renewable’s filing directly blames President’s decision to revoke the original permit by the Environmental Protection Agency and broader executive actions taken by the White House targeting offshore wind development.

“The President’s wind memorandum, the subsequent loss of permits and other actions taken by the current administration have forced the applicant’s parent company to materially reduce its workforce, terminate contracts and cancel planned project investments,” the company said.

EDF cited in its filing that these actions have created “an uncontrollable level of uncertainty,” making further investment in the NJ project financially and operationally risky.

Impact on New Jersey’s Clean Energy Goals

The Atlantic Shores Wind Farm, a major Biden-era effort that was slated to generate up to 1,500 megawatts of electricity, decarbonize the U.S. power grid and provide clean electricity to more than 700,000 homes, is now a part of the now-defunct Great loss for Renewable Future initiative. It was one of 11 offshore wind projects approved between 2021 and 2024 under the previous administration.

“This filing marks the end of a chapter, but not the end for Atlantic Shore,” Atlantic Shore CEO Joris Veldoven said in a public statement. “Offshore wind continues to provide NJ with a strong value proposition that includes thousands of well-paying jobs, stable electricity prices and real economic benefits.”

However, Veldoven noted that the company is “re-evaluating” its long-term plans in the U.S. due to changing federal policy. Opponents of offshore wind development, on the other hand — including lawmakers, fishermen and environmental groups concerned about marine life — are celebrating the announcement.

“This is a huge win for South Jersey,” said longtime critic Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.). “We have been fighting to protect our coastline, our economy and our communities from reckless offshore wind development.”

Bonnie Brady, president of the Long Island Commercial Fishing Association, added:

“Every time a wind company pulls out of a project in the United States, it’s a great day for all of us who make our living from the ocean.”

Offshore Wind Struggle Continues

This is the second major wind project in NJ to be canceled in less than two years. Earlier in 2023, Denmark’s Orsted abandoned its Ocean Wind projects due to economic pressures from inflation and global supply chain problems.

With the France-based renewable new joining the Renewal exit list, questions are being raised about the future viability of offshore wind power in the United States—especially under an administration that favors fossil fuels over renewables.


Conclusion: The Future of Energy Shifts in the Political Policies

As the political winds shift, clean energy developers are facing a new era of uncertainty in the United States. The renewable energy company, who plays a leading role, developed 23 GW over 300 projects, has withdrawal from the Atlantic Shores project could signal a broader industry withdrawal in response to federal opposition—which could have a high-impact impact on the country’s ability to meet climate goals.

Trump Officials Grants $5B New York Offshore Wind Project: Green energy milestone amid political adversity

Trump Officials Grants $5B New York Offshore Wind Project: Green energy milestone amid political adversity

Key Points

Offshore Wind Project Resumes Under Trump Order

Equinor Empire Wind Project site,
South Brooklyn Marine Terminal (SBMT) complex in Brooklyn, New York Offshore Wind Project site, Source: Equinor

In a surprising and significant move, the Trump administration has lifted the moratorium on Empire Wind 1 — a $5 billion offshore wind project led by Empire Offshore Wind LLC, a subsidiary of Equinor ASA. The green light marks a turning point in U.S. energy development, and is a rare moment of bipartisan alignment to advance clean energy infrastructure.

Norway-based Equinor will be able to resume construction after more than five weeks of costly delays. The move comes after months of intense opposition from industry leaders, state officials and clean energy advocates who warned that the moratorium would threaten more than 1,500 union jobs, billions in investments and America’s clean energy future.

Equinor Empire Wind ‘Back on Track’

Initially suspended by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum in April 2025 over concerns about the approval process, the project has now been reinstated after intense negotiations with 17 state and federal officials, along with more than 10 prominent environmentalists. Following a lawsuit against the Trump Executive Order, the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has officially lifted the offshore wind moratorium, allowing construction to resume on New York’s first offshore wind farm that will directly power the city of New York.

offshore wind project resumes construction following Trump officials approval
Oppedal, CEO, Equinor

Equinor CEO Anders Oppedal expressed gratitude for the decision, crediting President Trump, Governor Kathy Hochul and other local leaders for reviving the project and their collaborative efforts. “Construction can now resume on Empire Wind, a project that highlights our commitment to supporting the local economy while also providing energy and creating jobs,” said Oppedal.

Empire Wind 1 project resumes construction following Trump officials approval
Empire Wind project, Source: Equinor

Empire Wind 1 is a key component of New York’s renewable energy future. With 54 turbines planned – each up to 910 feet tall – the project is designed to generate 810 megawatts of clean electricity, enough to power 500,000 homes. More than 30% of the project is already complete, with $2.5 billion invested to date.

Molly Morris, President of Equinor Wind US, noted the project’s broad economic benefits: “Empire Wind brings investment to supply chains in states across the country, including New York, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Texas and South Carolina.

President Donald Trump has been a vocal critic of wind power since his inauguration — calling the turbines bird killers and an economic burden — and his decision to lift the moratorium on Empire Wind signals a planned shift that comes alongside an apparent backchannel deal to renegotiate pipeline capacity for natural gas. Yet his decision signals a broader energy compromise.

Burgum, in a social media statement, hinted at natural gas development as a condition: “Americans living in New York and New England will see significant economic benefits and lower utility costs from increased access to clean American natural gas.”

However, Governor Hochul reiterated his commitment to clean energy without directly mentioning any fossil fuel exemptions. “New York will work with the administration and private companies on new energy projects that meet legal requirements,” he said.

Empire Wind Construction Status

New York offshore wind project construction site off the coast
Wind turbine staging operations with the Manhattan skyline in the background. Equinor

Empire Wind’s resurgence comes amid a growing momentum for offshore wind projects on the U.S. East Coast. Other major developments, including Revolution Wind, Sunrise Wind and Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind, are also moving forward, with Revolution Wind about 75% complete.

Despite numerous political headwinds, obstacles and regulatory uncertainty, offshore wind has secured its place in America’s energy mix. Equinor aims to complete Empire Wind 1 by 2027. Despite fierce opposition from the U.S. government, Empire Wind has come back online in the face of a grassroots movement, and the winds of change are once again blowing in favor of clean, renewable energy.

Conclusion: New York Wind Project Transition

The latest halt to the Empire Wind project marks a pivotal moment for U.S. Green energy development, where political coordination and economic coordination are intertwined. Because

Despite the opposition, a complex but potentially promising shift in the energy narrative under the Trump administration is creating a mix of economic benefits, job creation, and infrastructure growth. With construction now underway, the project not only reinforces Equinor’s commitment to clean energy but also demonstrates the growing national momentum behind offshore wind.

Could 10 Environmental Groups’ Lawsuit Overturn Trump Offshore Wind Policy?

10 Environmental Groups' Lawsuit, Trump Offshore Wind Policy

Trump offshore wind Policy — a legal storm is brewing over America’s clean energy future.

Seventeen states, Washington, D.C., and a leading wind industry group have filed a landmark lawsuit against the Trump administration, seeking to overturn a controversial executive order that effectively blocks all new offshore wind energy development on the East and Southeast coasts.

A coalition of ten environmental organizations, including the Arcata-based — Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC), has filed a legal brief in support of the lawsuit challenging Trump’s policy. They argue that Trump’s offshore wind policy is “arbitrary, unlawful, and politically motivated, designed to favor fossil fuel interests by stifling the growth of clean energy.”

The question is, can the lawsuit really overturn Trump’s offshore wind ban — and what does it mean for the future of renewable energy in the United States?

What is Trump Offshore Wind Policy?

Offshore Wind Lawsuit”
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum

On his first day in office, Donald Trump signed an executive order temporarily halting the sale of offshore wind leases in federal waters and halting approvals, permits, and loans for all wind projects in key coastal states including Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina. While this policy is designed to protect marine ecosystems and coastal economies, but the order leaves wind energy developers hundreds of miles of federal waters. Following this, recently Trump administration halted construction of Empire Wind, a major offshore wind project by Equinor, a Norwegian company in New York, which was building the project to start generating electricity in 2026 and suppose to provide clean electricity to more than 500,000 homes.

The company finalized the federal lease for Empire Wind in March 2017, at the start of President Donald Trump’s first term. BOEM approved the construction and operation plan in February 2024, and construction began that year, but the multibillion-dollar project is stalling midway. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum ordered the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to halt construction on the fully approved Empire Offshore Wind Farm, the first offshore Wind Farm in New York, aiming to provide clean electricity to 500,000 New York homes.

Empire Offshore Wind project,
Empire Offshore Wind project

Critics say the policy was more about politics, designed to stall the progress of green energy, cast an unspoken doubt on the safety of wind power, and appease fossil fuel allies. This legal battle is a continuation of that.

Groups’ Lawsuit challenge: Who’s behind it?

The lawsuit, initially filed in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, was led by state attorneys general and supported by The Alliance for Clean Energy New York (ACE NY). Their lawsuit challenges both the validity of the executive order and the federal government’s refusal to process wind power permit applications that they say violate existing environmental and energy laws.

They are now joined by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Citizens Campaign for the Environment, Conservation Law Foundation, Environmental Advocates NY (represented by Earthjustice), Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental Protection Information Center, National Wildlife Federation, New York League of Conservation Voters, Sierra Club, and the Southern Environmental Law Center, and other powerful organizations, have filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief to strengthen the case for the immediate lifting of the ban.

Environmental 10 groups argue that the ban is legally unenforceable and environmentally harmful. In a joint petition, they say:

They highlight the hypocrisy of the administration’s claim to protect wildlife from wind projects, while also seeking to undermine federal wildlife protections and fast-track fossil fuel infrastructure, which has far-reaching impacts on ecosystems and the climate.

  • Threatens thousands of green-paying green jobs
  • Threatens Hinder billions and economic development in the Southeast, where more than 100 companies produce components for the wind industry
  • States’ ability to meet emissions-reduction targets
  • Customer access to affordable, clean electricity
  • States like New York, which has invested heavily in offshore wind projects, argue that the ban threatens their energy sovereignty and undermines long-term planning.

As Adrian Esposito of the Citizens Campaign for the Environment says:

Environmental Groups' Sue Trump
citizens campaign for the environment

Will the court overturn trump executive order

  • Legal experts say the case is strong. The plaintiffs argue that Trump’s blanket ban:
  • exceeds the president’s authority
  • violates established permitting laws
  • lacks any scientific or environmental justification

Furthermore, the Biden administration has since rescinded the executive order, yet the permits remain in limbo. The case could provide the legal clarity needed to force the federal government to resume processing wind energy permits. The amicus brief urges the court to grant a preliminary injunction, which would allow the permits to continue until the larger case is resolved.

As Vanessa Fajans-Turner of Environmental Advocates NY says:
The case is about more than permission – it’s about power.

The case represents a rare show of unity among states, industry, and environmentalists at this time – all determined to defend wind power as a critical and growing solution to climate change, economic development, and energy independence.

Julie Tighe, president of the New York League of Conservation Voters, is furious and insists:

Jill Tauber, vice president of litigation for climate and energy at Earth Justice cited.

Jill Tauber vice president of litigation for climate and energy at Earth Justice Picsart AiImageEnhancer 1
Wind power plays a critical role in keeping our energy grid reliable and affordable,” Jill Tauber,

Kate Sinding, senior VP of the Conservation Law Foundation, told Daily.

Final Thoughts: Can the Ban Be Overturned?

Yes—this case has the potential to overturn Trump’s offshore wind policy, revive the permitting process, and clear the way for major offshore wind development in U.S. waters.

If it does, it would also set an important precedent. If the court finds that the executive branch cannot arbitrarily block clean energy development without due process or scientific justification, it could protect future climate policy from political interference.

For now, the wind industry—and the planet—are waiting.