WindNewsToday

Trump Offshore Wind Policy Shocks 5-Year Forecast Drop 25%

Trump Offshore Wind Policy Shocks 5-Year Forecast Drop 25%

Trump Offshore Wind Policy Shocks 5-Year Forecast Drop 25%

The global renewable energy market is bracing for turbulence as President Donald Trump offshore wind policy sends shockwaves through the industry. According to a new report from the International Energy Agency (IEA), the forecast for global offshore wind capacity growth has been cut by more than 25% over the next five years—a direct result of the Trump administration’s renewed push for fossil fuels and tightened restrictions on clean energy projects.

U.S. Policy Shift Alters Global Renewable Trajectory

The IEA’s revised outlook paints a stark picture: the forecast for renewable energy generation between 2025 and 2030 is now 5% lower than last year’s estimate, with the U.S. share slashed by nearly 50%.

IEA 2025 report shows a 25 percent reduction in offshore wind capacity growth forecast under Trump policy
Renewable capacity expansion changes from Renewables 2024 to Renewables 2025 in selected countries or regions, 2025-2030, Image: IEA

Policy changes under the Trump administration have contributed heavily to the downgrade. These include the following: Offshore wind industry outlook

  • Early withdrawal of federal tax credits for clean energy developers.
  • A freeze on new offshore wind leases.
  • A cap on permits for onshore wind and solar PV projects on federal land.
  • Import restrictions on wind turbine components and rare-earth materials.

The result: a wave of project cancellations, delays, and investor uncertainty across the U.S. renewable landscape.

Offshore Wind Industry Faces a 25% Growth Collapse

The most dramatic impact has fallen on the offshore wind sector, once seen as a cornerstone of America’s clean energy transition. The IEA report now predicts that offshore wind capacity growth will be 25% lower than previously projected over the next five years.

Developers like Ørsted, RWE, and Equinor have already scaled back 2030 offshore wind capacity growth targets, citing rising costs, long permitting delays, and the chilling effect of new federal restrictions.

The new Trump energy policy marks a turning point,” said an industry analyst. “It could undo years of progress in offshore wind just as the U.S. was starting to compete with Europe and China.”

China Surges Ahead Despite Policy Adjustments

While the United States steps back, China continues to surge ahead—accounting for about 60% of global renewable power capacity growth.

Though China recently shifted from fixed tariffs to competitive auctions (causing a temporary slowdown), it remains on track to reach its 2035 wind and solar targets five years early. The contrast between the two largest economies highlights a widening gap in global clean energy leadership.

China leads global renewable capacity growth as U.S. offshore wind forecast drops under Trump energy policy
Weighted average net margins of renewable energy companies in China, Q2 2023-Q2 2025. Source: IEA
Weighted average net margins of renewable energy companies excluding China, Q2 2023-Q2 2025
Weighted average net margins of renewable energy companies excluding China, Q2 2023-Q2 2025 Source: IEA

Trump’s Fossil Fuel Agenda Returns

The IEA report also notes that President Trump’s return to the White House in January for a second term has brought with it a clear shift in energy priorities. Trump has pledged to expand oil, gas, and coal production while arguing that renewables are “too costly and unreliable.”

Critics warn that such a stance could undermine America’s climate commitments and job growth in the renewable sector. Offshore wind projects—particularly those planned off the East Coast—are already facing multi-billion-dollar setbacks.

Market Reaction: Global Developers Reconsider U.S. Expansion

Investors and energy developers are responding cautiously. Some companies have paused offshore wind investments in U.S. waters, redirecting funds toward European and Asian markets where policy support remains strong.

Uncertainty is the biggest threat,” said a senior executive from a European renewable developer. “Policy reversals make long-term investment planning nearly impossible.”

Meanwhile, states like New York and Massachusetts are trying to push forward with their offshore projects independently—but without federal backing, their timelines and incentives could face significant delays under Trump renewable energy policy.

The Broader Impact on Clean Energy Ambitions

The new 25% offshore wind forecast cut doesn’t just impact future turbines—it represents a potential loss of thousands of jobs, billions in investment, and slower progress toward emission targets.

Industry experts argue that offshore wind remains vital to meeting global net-zero goals, providing a reliable large-scale renewable source. A prolonged slowdown could have cascading effects across supply chains, port infrastructure, and coastal economies.

Outlook: Can the U.S. Regain Momentum?

Despite the grim short-term outlook, analysts believe the U.S. offshore wind industry could recover if political and policy shifts occur before 2030. Bipartisan support for energy security and local manufacturing might still bring new opportunities.

For now, the Trump offshore wind policy stands as a major turning point—reshaping not just America’s clean energy trajectory but also the global race toward renewable dominance.

Stay updated with the latest on U.S. offshore wind policy, global renewable investments, and industry forecasts—follow WindNewsToday for breaking updates and expert insights.

Could 10 Environmental Groups’ Lawsuit Overturn Trump Offshore Wind Policy?

10 Environmental Groups' Lawsuit, Trump Offshore Wind Policy

Trump offshore wind Policy — a legal storm is brewing over America’s clean energy future.

Seventeen states, Washington, D.C., and a leading wind industry group have filed a landmark lawsuit against the Trump administration, seeking to overturn a controversial executive order that effectively blocks all new offshore wind energy development on the East and Southeast coasts.

A coalition of ten environmental organizations, including the Arcata-based — Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC), has filed a legal brief in support of the lawsuit challenging Trump’s policy. They argue that Trump’s offshore wind policy is “arbitrary, unlawful, and politically motivated, designed to favor fossil fuel interests by stifling the growth of clean energy.”

The question is, can the lawsuit really overturn Trump’s offshore wind ban — and what does it mean for the future of renewable energy in the United States?

What is Trump Offshore Wind Policy?

Offshore Wind Lawsuit”
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum

On his first day in office, Donald Trump signed an executive order temporarily halting the sale of offshore wind leases in federal waters and halting approvals, permits, and loans for all wind projects in key coastal states including Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina. While this policy is designed to protect marine ecosystems and coastal economies, but the order leaves wind energy developers hundreds of miles of federal waters. Following this, recently Trump administration halted construction of Empire Wind, a major offshore wind project by Equinor, a Norwegian company in New York, which was building the project to start generating electricity in 2026 and suppose to provide clean electricity to more than 500,000 homes.

The company finalized the federal lease for Empire Wind in March 2017, at the start of President Donald Trump’s first term. BOEM approved the construction and operation plan in February 2024, and construction began that year, but the multibillion-dollar project is stalling midway. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum ordered the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to halt construction on the fully approved Empire Offshore Wind Farm, the first offshore Wind Farm in New York, aiming to provide clean electricity to 500,000 New York homes.

Empire Offshore Wind project,
Empire Offshore Wind project

Critics say the policy was more about politics, designed to stall the progress of green energy, cast an unspoken doubt on the safety of wind power, and appease fossil fuel allies. This legal battle is a continuation of that.

Groups’ Lawsuit challenge: Who’s behind it?

The lawsuit, initially filed in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, was led by state attorneys general and supported by The Alliance for Clean Energy New York (ACE NY). Their lawsuit challenges both the validity of the executive order and the federal government’s refusal to process wind power permit applications that they say violate existing environmental and energy laws.

They are now joined by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Citizens Campaign for the Environment, Conservation Law Foundation, Environmental Advocates NY (represented by Earthjustice), Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental Protection Information Center, National Wildlife Federation, New York League of Conservation Voters, Sierra Club, and the Southern Environmental Law Center, and other powerful organizations, have filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief to strengthen the case for the immediate lifting of the ban.

Environmental 10 groups argue that the ban is legally unenforceable and environmentally harmful. In a joint petition, they say:

They highlight the hypocrisy of the administration’s claim to protect wildlife from wind projects, while also seeking to undermine federal wildlife protections and fast-track fossil fuel infrastructure, which has far-reaching impacts on ecosystems and the climate.

  • Threatens thousands of green-paying green jobs
  • Threatens Hinder billions and economic development in the Southeast, where more than 100 companies produce components for the wind industry
  • States’ ability to meet emissions-reduction targets
  • Customer access to affordable, clean electricity
  • States like New York, which has invested heavily in offshore wind projects, argue that the ban threatens their energy sovereignty and undermines long-term planning.

As Adrian Esposito of the Citizens Campaign for the Environment says:

Environmental Groups' Sue Trump
citizens campaign for the environment

Will the court overturn trump executive order

  • Legal experts say the case is strong. The plaintiffs argue that Trump’s blanket ban:
  • exceeds the president’s authority
  • violates established permitting laws
  • lacks any scientific or environmental justification

Furthermore, the Biden administration has since rescinded the executive order, yet the permits remain in limbo. The case could provide the legal clarity needed to force the federal government to resume processing wind energy permits. The amicus brief urges the court to grant a preliminary injunction, which would allow the permits to continue until the larger case is resolved.

As Vanessa Fajans-Turner of Environmental Advocates NY says:
The case is about more than permission – it’s about power.

The case represents a rare show of unity among states, industry, and environmentalists at this time – all determined to defend wind power as a critical and growing solution to climate change, economic development, and energy independence.

Julie Tighe, president of the New York League of Conservation Voters, is furious and insists:

Jill Tauber, vice president of litigation for climate and energy at Earth Justice cited.

Jill Tauber vice president of litigation for climate and energy at Earth Justice Picsart AiImageEnhancer 1
Wind power plays a critical role in keeping our energy grid reliable and affordable,” Jill Tauber,

Kate Sinding, senior VP of the Conservation Law Foundation, told Daily.

Final Thoughts: Can the Ban Be Overturned?

Yes—this case has the potential to overturn Trump’s offshore wind policy, revive the permitting process, and clear the way for major offshore wind development in U.S. waters.

If it does, it would also set an important precedent. If the court finds that the executive branch cannot arbitrarily block clean energy development without due process or scientific justification, it could protect future climate policy from political interference.

For now, the wind industry—and the planet—are waiting.